衡量反编译器和混淆器有效性的度量标准

Nomair A. Naeem, Michael Batchelder, L. Hendren
{"title":"衡量反编译器和混淆器有效性的度量标准","authors":"Nomair A. Naeem, Michael Batchelder, L. Hendren","doi":"10.1109/ICPC.2007.27","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Java developers often use decompilers to aid reverse engineering and obfuscators to prevent it. Decompilers translate low-level class files to Java source and can produce \"good\" output. Obfuscators transform class files into semantically-equivalent versions that are either: (1) difficult to decompile, or (2) decompilable, but result in \"hard- to-understand\" Java source. We present a set of metrics developed to quantify the effectiveness of decompilers and obfuscators. The metrics include some selective size and counting metrics and an expression complexity metric. We have applied these metrics to evaluate a collection of decompilers and obfuscators. By quantitatively comparing original Java source against decompiled and obfuscated code respectively, we show which decompilers produce \"good\" code and whether obfuscations result in \"hard-to-understand\" code.","PeriodicalId":135871,"journal":{"name":"15th IEEE International Conference on Program Comprehension (ICPC '07)","volume":"18 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2007-06-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"20","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Metrics for Measuring the Effectiveness of Decompilers and Obfuscators\",\"authors\":\"Nomair A. Naeem, Michael Batchelder, L. Hendren\",\"doi\":\"10.1109/ICPC.2007.27\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Java developers often use decompilers to aid reverse engineering and obfuscators to prevent it. Decompilers translate low-level class files to Java source and can produce \\\"good\\\" output. Obfuscators transform class files into semantically-equivalent versions that are either: (1) difficult to decompile, or (2) decompilable, but result in \\\"hard- to-understand\\\" Java source. We present a set of metrics developed to quantify the effectiveness of decompilers and obfuscators. The metrics include some selective size and counting metrics and an expression complexity metric. We have applied these metrics to evaluate a collection of decompilers and obfuscators. By quantitatively comparing original Java source against decompiled and obfuscated code respectively, we show which decompilers produce \\\"good\\\" code and whether obfuscations result in \\\"hard-to-understand\\\" code.\",\"PeriodicalId\":135871,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"15th IEEE International Conference on Program Comprehension (ICPC '07)\",\"volume\":\"18 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2007-06-26\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"20\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"15th IEEE International Conference on Program Comprehension (ICPC '07)\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1109/ICPC.2007.27\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"15th IEEE International Conference on Program Comprehension (ICPC '07)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/ICPC.2007.27","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 20

摘要

Java开发人员经常使用反编译器来帮助逆向工程,并使用混淆器来防止逆向工程。反编译器将低级别的类文件转换为Java源文件,并可以产生“良好”的输出。混淆器将类文件转换为语义上等价的版本,这些版本要么:(1)难以反编译,要么(2)可反编译,但会导致“难以理解”的Java源代码。我们提出了一套度量标准来量化反编译器和混淆器的有效性。这些度量包括一些可选择的大小和计数度量以及表达式复杂度度量。我们已经应用这些度量来评估反编译器和混淆器的集合。通过分别对原始Java源代码与反编译和混淆代码进行定量比较,我们展示了哪些反编译器生成“好的”代码,以及混淆是否会导致“难以理解”的代码。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Metrics for Measuring the Effectiveness of Decompilers and Obfuscators
Java developers often use decompilers to aid reverse engineering and obfuscators to prevent it. Decompilers translate low-level class files to Java source and can produce "good" output. Obfuscators transform class files into semantically-equivalent versions that are either: (1) difficult to decompile, or (2) decompilable, but result in "hard- to-understand" Java source. We present a set of metrics developed to quantify the effectiveness of decompilers and obfuscators. The metrics include some selective size and counting metrics and an expression complexity metric. We have applied these metrics to evaluate a collection of decompilers and obfuscators. By quantitatively comparing original Java source against decompiled and obfuscated code respectively, we show which decompilers produce "good" code and whether obfuscations result in "hard-to-understand" code.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信