HCI制定议程

Jeffrey Bardzell, Shaowen Bardzell, Cindy Lin Kaiying, S. Lindtner, Austin Toombs
{"title":"HCI制定议程","authors":"Jeffrey Bardzell, Shaowen Bardzell, Cindy Lin Kaiying, S. Lindtner, Austin Toombs","doi":"10.1561/1100000066","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"In this survey, we examine how making emerged as an interdisciplinaryarena of scholarship, research and design that connects entrepreneurs,designers, researchers, critical theorists, historians, anthropologists,computer scientists and engineers. HCI is one among many other fieldsand domains that has declared having a stake in making. And yet,a lot of what and who defines making is happening outside the familiarresearch laboratory or design studio. We take this article as anopportunity to reflect on HCI's relationship to making and how this relationshiphas changed over the last years. Making, we argue, presentsHCI with the opportunity to question and revisit underlying principlesand long-held aspirations and values of the field. Exactly because HCIand making share some fundamental ideals such as user empowermentand the democratization of participation and technology production,making confronts us with both the potential and the unintended consequencesof our own work.","PeriodicalId":126315,"journal":{"name":"Found. Trends Hum. Comput. Interact.","volume":"11 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2017-12-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"37","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"HCI's Making Agendas\",\"authors\":\"Jeffrey Bardzell, Shaowen Bardzell, Cindy Lin Kaiying, S. Lindtner, Austin Toombs\",\"doi\":\"10.1561/1100000066\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"In this survey, we examine how making emerged as an interdisciplinaryarena of scholarship, research and design that connects entrepreneurs,designers, researchers, critical theorists, historians, anthropologists,computer scientists and engineers. HCI is one among many other fieldsand domains that has declared having a stake in making. And yet,a lot of what and who defines making is happening outside the familiarresearch laboratory or design studio. We take this article as anopportunity to reflect on HCI's relationship to making and how this relationshiphas changed over the last years. Making, we argue, presentsHCI with the opportunity to question and revisit underlying principlesand long-held aspirations and values of the field. Exactly because HCIand making share some fundamental ideals such as user empowermentand the democratization of participation and technology production,making confronts us with both the potential and the unintended consequencesof our own work.\",\"PeriodicalId\":126315,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Found. Trends Hum. Comput. Interact.\",\"volume\":\"11 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2017-12-19\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"37\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Found. Trends Hum. Comput. Interact.\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1561/1100000066\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Found. Trends Hum. Comput. Interact.","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1561/1100000066","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 37

摘要

在这个调查中,我们研究了制造如何成为一个跨学科的学术、研究和设计领域,将企业家、设计师、研究人员、批判理论家、历史学家、人类学家、计算机科学家和工程师联系在一起。人工智能是许多其他领域和领域之一,它们已宣布在制造业中占有一席之地。然而,许多定义制作的事物和人物都发生在我们熟悉的研究实验室或设计工作室之外。我们以这篇文章为契机,反思HCI与制作的关系,以及这种关系在过去几年里发生了怎样的变化。我们认为,制作为shci提供了质疑和重新审视该领域的基本原则以及长期以来的愿望和价值观的机会。正是因为hci和制造有一些共同的基本理念,比如用户赋权、参与和技术生产的民主化,制造让我们既要面对自己工作的潜在后果,也要面对意想不到的后果。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
HCI's Making Agendas
In this survey, we examine how making emerged as an interdisciplinaryarena of scholarship, research and design that connects entrepreneurs,designers, researchers, critical theorists, historians, anthropologists,computer scientists and engineers. HCI is one among many other fieldsand domains that has declared having a stake in making. And yet,a lot of what and who defines making is happening outside the familiarresearch laboratory or design studio. We take this article as anopportunity to reflect on HCI's relationship to making and how this relationshiphas changed over the last years. Making, we argue, presentsHCI with the opportunity to question and revisit underlying principlesand long-held aspirations and values of the field. Exactly because HCIand making share some fundamental ideals such as user empowermentand the democratization of participation and technology production,making confronts us with both the potential and the unintended consequencesof our own work.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信