使用两位模式计算信息泄漏边界

Ziyuan Meng, Geoffrey Smith
{"title":"使用两位模式计算信息泄漏边界","authors":"Ziyuan Meng, Geoffrey Smith","doi":"10.1145/2166956.2166957","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Theories of quantitative information flow have seen growing interest recently, in view of the fundamental importance of controlling the leakage of confidential information, together with the pragmatic necessity of tolerating intuitively \"small\" leaks. Given such a theory, it is crucial to develop automated techniques for calculating the leakage in a system. In this paper, we address this question in the context of deterministic imperative programs and under the recently-proposed min-entropy measure of information leakage, which measures leakage in terms of the confidential information's vulnerability to being guessed in one try by an adversary. In this context, calculating the maximum leakage of a program reduces to counting the number of feasible outputs that it can produce. We approach this task by determining patterns among pairs of bits in the output, for instance by determining that two bits must be unequal. By counting the number of solutions to the two-bit patterns, we obtain an upper bound on the number of feasible outputs and hence on the leakage. We explore the effectiveness of our approach on a number of case studies, in terms of both efficiency and accuracy.","PeriodicalId":119000,"journal":{"name":"ACM Workshop on Programming Languages and Analysis for Security","volume":"23 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2011-06-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"43","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Calculating bounds on information leakage using two-bit patterns\",\"authors\":\"Ziyuan Meng, Geoffrey Smith\",\"doi\":\"10.1145/2166956.2166957\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Theories of quantitative information flow have seen growing interest recently, in view of the fundamental importance of controlling the leakage of confidential information, together with the pragmatic necessity of tolerating intuitively \\\"small\\\" leaks. Given such a theory, it is crucial to develop automated techniques for calculating the leakage in a system. In this paper, we address this question in the context of deterministic imperative programs and under the recently-proposed min-entropy measure of information leakage, which measures leakage in terms of the confidential information's vulnerability to being guessed in one try by an adversary. In this context, calculating the maximum leakage of a program reduces to counting the number of feasible outputs that it can produce. We approach this task by determining patterns among pairs of bits in the output, for instance by determining that two bits must be unequal. By counting the number of solutions to the two-bit patterns, we obtain an upper bound on the number of feasible outputs and hence on the leakage. We explore the effectiveness of our approach on a number of case studies, in terms of both efficiency and accuracy.\",\"PeriodicalId\":119000,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"ACM Workshop on Programming Languages and Analysis for Security\",\"volume\":\"23 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2011-06-05\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"43\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"ACM Workshop on Programming Languages and Analysis for Security\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1145/2166956.2166957\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"ACM Workshop on Programming Languages and Analysis for Security","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1145/2166956.2166957","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 43

摘要

鉴于控制机密信息泄漏的根本重要性,以及容忍直觉上“小”泄漏的实用必要性,定量信息流理论最近受到越来越多的关注。考虑到这样的理论,开发自动计算系统泄漏的技术是至关重要的。在本文中,我们在确定性命令式程序的背景下解决了这个问题,并在最近提出的信息泄漏的最小熵度量下解决了这个问题,该度量是根据机密信息在一次尝试中被对手猜测的脆弱性来度量泄漏。在这种情况下,计算程序的最大泄漏减少到计算它可以产生的可行输出的数量。我们通过确定输出中比特对之间的模式来完成这项任务,例如确定两个比特必须是不相等的。通过计算两位模式的解的个数,我们得到了可行输出的个数的上界,从而得到了泄漏的上界。我们在一些案例研究中探讨了我们的方法在效率和准确性方面的有效性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Calculating bounds on information leakage using two-bit patterns
Theories of quantitative information flow have seen growing interest recently, in view of the fundamental importance of controlling the leakage of confidential information, together with the pragmatic necessity of tolerating intuitively "small" leaks. Given such a theory, it is crucial to develop automated techniques for calculating the leakage in a system. In this paper, we address this question in the context of deterministic imperative programs and under the recently-proposed min-entropy measure of information leakage, which measures leakage in terms of the confidential information's vulnerability to being guessed in one try by an adversary. In this context, calculating the maximum leakage of a program reduces to counting the number of feasible outputs that it can produce. We approach this task by determining patterns among pairs of bits in the output, for instance by determining that two bits must be unequal. By counting the number of solutions to the two-bit patterns, we obtain an upper bound on the number of feasible outputs and hence on the leakage. We explore the effectiveness of our approach on a number of case studies, in terms of both efficiency and accuracy.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信