{"title":"补偿屏蔽外壳对辐射发射测量的影响","authors":"R.B. Smith","doi":"10.1109/ISEMC.1996.561257","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This paper compares the differences in open area test site (OATS) derived antenna factors to those derived for a specific location of a shielded enclosure as well as the resultant E-field of a simulated-equipment under test (S-EUT) using each. It will also show that using position specific shielded enclosure derived antenna factors not only produces excellent agreement on the resultant E-field for measurements made in two enclosures, but also to the predicted E-field of the S-EUT.","PeriodicalId":296175,"journal":{"name":"Proceedings of Symposium on Electromagnetic Compatibility","volume":"30 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1996-08-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Compensating for shielded enclosure effects on radiated emissions measurements\",\"authors\":\"R.B. Smith\",\"doi\":\"10.1109/ISEMC.1996.561257\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"This paper compares the differences in open area test site (OATS) derived antenna factors to those derived for a specific location of a shielded enclosure as well as the resultant E-field of a simulated-equipment under test (S-EUT) using each. It will also show that using position specific shielded enclosure derived antenna factors not only produces excellent agreement on the resultant E-field for measurements made in two enclosures, but also to the predicted E-field of the S-EUT.\",\"PeriodicalId\":296175,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Proceedings of Symposium on Electromagnetic Compatibility\",\"volume\":\"30 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"1996-08-19\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"2\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Proceedings of Symposium on Electromagnetic Compatibility\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1109/ISEMC.1996.561257\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Proceedings of Symposium on Electromagnetic Compatibility","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/ISEMC.1996.561257","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
Compensating for shielded enclosure effects on radiated emissions measurements
This paper compares the differences in open area test site (OATS) derived antenna factors to those derived for a specific location of a shielded enclosure as well as the resultant E-field of a simulated-equipment under test (S-EUT) using each. It will also show that using position specific shielded enclosure derived antenna factors not only produces excellent agreement on the resultant E-field for measurements made in two enclosures, but also to the predicted E-field of the S-EUT.