马丁·丘兹莱维特的《拒绝“自然”:伊甸园中的种族主义、奴隶制和死亡》

James Armstrong
{"title":"马丁·丘兹莱维特的《拒绝“自然”:伊甸园中的种族主义、奴隶制和死亡》","authors":"James Armstrong","doi":"10.5325/dickstudannu.54.1.0001","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"abstract:In Martin Chuzzlewit, Charles Dickens skewers the use of nature as a justification for vice, instead inviting readers to rise above their baser impulses, be those tendencies \"natural\" or not. This article looks at how nineteenth-century discourses of America as a natural paradise influenced Dickens's depiction of the land, its inhabitants, and the political institutions taking root there in the 1840s. The novel's critique of the role of nature in American life reached a crescendo with Martin's arrival in Eden, a town linked by its name to a pro-nature ideology. Dickens's rejection of Eden is a rejection not just of the United States, but of what he saw as the naïve and self-interested acceptance of \"nature\" as a replacement for complex moral thought. This critique is reiterated in the murder plot involving Jonas Chuzzlewit and is central to Dickens's attack on selfishness and the many evils it generates, including fraud, violence, and slavery.","PeriodicalId":195639,"journal":{"name":"Dickens Studies Annual: Essays on Victorian Fiction","volume":"36 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Rejecting \\\"Nature\\\" in Martin Chuzzlewit: Racism, Slavery, and Death in Eden\",\"authors\":\"James Armstrong\",\"doi\":\"10.5325/dickstudannu.54.1.0001\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"abstract:In Martin Chuzzlewit, Charles Dickens skewers the use of nature as a justification for vice, instead inviting readers to rise above their baser impulses, be those tendencies \\\"natural\\\" or not. This article looks at how nineteenth-century discourses of America as a natural paradise influenced Dickens's depiction of the land, its inhabitants, and the political institutions taking root there in the 1840s. The novel's critique of the role of nature in American life reached a crescendo with Martin's arrival in Eden, a town linked by its name to a pro-nature ideology. Dickens's rejection of Eden is a rejection not just of the United States, but of what he saw as the naïve and self-interested acceptance of \\\"nature\\\" as a replacement for complex moral thought. This critique is reiterated in the murder plot involving Jonas Chuzzlewit and is central to Dickens's attack on selfishness and the many evils it generates, including fraud, violence, and slavery.\",\"PeriodicalId\":195639,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Dickens Studies Annual: Essays on Victorian Fiction\",\"volume\":\"36 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-03-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Dickens Studies Annual: Essays on Victorian Fiction\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.5325/dickstudannu.54.1.0001\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Dickens Studies Annual: Essays on Victorian Fiction","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5325/dickstudannu.54.1.0001","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

在《马丁·丘兹莱维特》中,查尔斯·狄更斯将自然作为邪恶的借口,而不是邀请读者超越他们的低级冲动,不管这些倾向是否“自然”。这篇文章着眼于19世纪美国作为自然天堂的话语是如何影响狄更斯对19世纪40年代美国土地、居民和政治制度的描述的。小说对自然在美国人生活中所扮演角色的批判随着马丁到达伊甸园(Eden)而达到高潮,这个小镇的名字与亲自然的意识形态联系在一起。狄更斯对伊甸园的拒绝不仅是对美国的拒绝,也是对他所看到的naïve和对“自然”作为复杂道德思想的替代品的自我利益的接受。这种批评在乔纳斯·丘兹莱维特的谋杀阴谋中得到了重申,也是狄更斯对自私及其产生的许多罪恶(包括欺诈、暴力和奴隶制)的攻击的核心。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Rejecting "Nature" in Martin Chuzzlewit: Racism, Slavery, and Death in Eden
abstract:In Martin Chuzzlewit, Charles Dickens skewers the use of nature as a justification for vice, instead inviting readers to rise above their baser impulses, be those tendencies "natural" or not. This article looks at how nineteenth-century discourses of America as a natural paradise influenced Dickens's depiction of the land, its inhabitants, and the political institutions taking root there in the 1840s. The novel's critique of the role of nature in American life reached a crescendo with Martin's arrival in Eden, a town linked by its name to a pro-nature ideology. Dickens's rejection of Eden is a rejection not just of the United States, but of what he saw as the naïve and self-interested acceptance of "nature" as a replacement for complex moral thought. This critique is reiterated in the murder plot involving Jonas Chuzzlewit and is central to Dickens's attack on selfishness and the many evils it generates, including fraud, violence, and slavery.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信