重新校准的TOMS总臭氧数据与Dobson网络的比较

C. Wellemeyer, Ramdas R. Singh, R. Mcpeters, R. Hudson
{"title":"重新校准的TOMS总臭氧数据与Dobson网络的比较","authors":"C. Wellemeyer, Ramdas R. Singh, R. Mcpeters, R. Hudson","doi":"10.1364/orsa.1990.wa8","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Nine years of reprocessed Version 6 total ozone data from the Total Ozone Mapping Spectrometer (TOMS) are compared with selected subsets of the Dobson ground based Network. A small long-term drift of -0.11 ± 0.09 %/yr (95% confidence) is identified in the first nine years of TOMS data relative to Dobson. This small change in bias (amounting to 1% over the nine year period) is of the order of the long-term stability of the calibration of both measurement systems. However, a possible mechanism for the drift is identified. Changes in tropospheric ozone are only partly measured by the backscattered ultraviolet (BUV) method [Klenk et al., 1982]. Based on recent estimates of the change in tropospheric ozone [Bojkov, 1987] and of the BUV sensitivity to changes in tropospheric ozone [Fleig et al., 1989], about half of the observed drift would be attributed to this effect. The reprocessed Version 6 TOMS data set is available through the National Space Science Data Center, GSFC/NASA, Greenbelt Maryland.","PeriodicalId":320202,"journal":{"name":"Optical Remote Sensing of the Atmosphere","volume":"31 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1900-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Comparison of Re-calibrated TOMS Total Ozone Data with Dobson Network\",\"authors\":\"C. Wellemeyer, Ramdas R. Singh, R. Mcpeters, R. Hudson\",\"doi\":\"10.1364/orsa.1990.wa8\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Nine years of reprocessed Version 6 total ozone data from the Total Ozone Mapping Spectrometer (TOMS) are compared with selected subsets of the Dobson ground based Network. A small long-term drift of -0.11 ± 0.09 %/yr (95% confidence) is identified in the first nine years of TOMS data relative to Dobson. This small change in bias (amounting to 1% over the nine year period) is of the order of the long-term stability of the calibration of both measurement systems. However, a possible mechanism for the drift is identified. Changes in tropospheric ozone are only partly measured by the backscattered ultraviolet (BUV) method [Klenk et al., 1982]. Based on recent estimates of the change in tropospheric ozone [Bojkov, 1987] and of the BUV sensitivity to changes in tropospheric ozone [Fleig et al., 1989], about half of the observed drift would be attributed to this effect. The reprocessed Version 6 TOMS data set is available through the National Space Science Data Center, GSFC/NASA, Greenbelt Maryland.\",\"PeriodicalId\":320202,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Optical Remote Sensing of the Atmosphere\",\"volume\":\"31 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"1900-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Optical Remote Sensing of the Atmosphere\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1364/orsa.1990.wa8\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Optical Remote Sensing of the Atmosphere","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1364/orsa.1990.wa8","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

我们将9年来由total ozone Mapping Spectrometer (TOMS)提供的重新处理的Version 6 total ozone数据与Dobson ground based Network的选定子集进行比较。相对于Dobson,在TOMS数据的前9年,确定了-0.11±0.09% /年(95%置信度)的小长期漂移。这种偏差的微小变化(九年期间约为1%)是两个测量系统校准的长期稳定性的数量级。然而,一种可能的漂移机制被确定。背向散射紫外线(BUV)方法只能部分测量对流层臭氧的变化[Klenk et al., 1982]。根据最近对对流层臭氧变化的估计[Bojkov, 1987]和BUV对对流层臭氧变化的敏感性[Fleig等人,1989],观测到的漂移中约有一半可归因于这种影响。经过重新处理的第6版TOMS数据集可通过马里兰州格林贝尔特GSFC/NASA国家空间科学数据中心获得。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Comparison of Re-calibrated TOMS Total Ozone Data with Dobson Network
Nine years of reprocessed Version 6 total ozone data from the Total Ozone Mapping Spectrometer (TOMS) are compared with selected subsets of the Dobson ground based Network. A small long-term drift of -0.11 ± 0.09 %/yr (95% confidence) is identified in the first nine years of TOMS data relative to Dobson. This small change in bias (amounting to 1% over the nine year period) is of the order of the long-term stability of the calibration of both measurement systems. However, a possible mechanism for the drift is identified. Changes in tropospheric ozone are only partly measured by the backscattered ultraviolet (BUV) method [Klenk et al., 1982]. Based on recent estimates of the change in tropospheric ozone [Bojkov, 1987] and of the BUV sensitivity to changes in tropospheric ozone [Fleig et al., 1989], about half of the observed drift would be attributed to this effect. The reprocessed Version 6 TOMS data set is available through the National Space Science Data Center, GSFC/NASA, Greenbelt Maryland.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信