统一网:规范证明网量词

Dominic J. D. Hughes
{"title":"统一网:规范证明网量词","authors":"Dominic J. D. Hughes","doi":"10.1145/3209108.3209159","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Proof nets for MLL (unit-free Multiplicative Linear Logic) are concise graphical representations of proofs which are canonical in the sense that they abstract away syntactic redundancy such as the order of non-interacting rules. We argue that Girard's extension to MLL1 (first-order MLL) fails to be canonical because of redundant existential witnesses, and present canonical MLL1 proof nets called unification nets without them. For example, while there are infinitely many cut-free Girard nets ∀x Px ⊢ ∃x Px, one per arbitrary witness for ∃x, there is a unique cut-free unification net, with no specified witness. Cut elimination for unification nets is local and linear time, while Girard's is non-local and exponential time. Since some unification nets are exponentially smaller than corresponding Girard nets and sequent proofs, technical delicacy is required to ensure correctness is polynomial-time (quadratic). These results transcend MLL1 via a methodological insight: for canonical quantifiers, the standard parallel/sequential dichotomy of proof nets is insufficient; an implicit/explicit witness dichotomy is needed. Current work extends unification nets to additives and uses them to extend combinatorial proofs [Proofs without syntax, Annals of Mathematics, 2006] to classical first-order logic.","PeriodicalId":389131,"journal":{"name":"Proceedings of the 33rd Annual ACM/IEEE Symposium on Logic in Computer Science","volume":"21 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2018-02-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"12","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Unification nets: canonical proof net quantifiers\",\"authors\":\"Dominic J. D. Hughes\",\"doi\":\"10.1145/3209108.3209159\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Proof nets for MLL (unit-free Multiplicative Linear Logic) are concise graphical representations of proofs which are canonical in the sense that they abstract away syntactic redundancy such as the order of non-interacting rules. We argue that Girard's extension to MLL1 (first-order MLL) fails to be canonical because of redundant existential witnesses, and present canonical MLL1 proof nets called unification nets without them. For example, while there are infinitely many cut-free Girard nets ∀x Px ⊢ ∃x Px, one per arbitrary witness for ∃x, there is a unique cut-free unification net, with no specified witness. Cut elimination for unification nets is local and linear time, while Girard's is non-local and exponential time. Since some unification nets are exponentially smaller than corresponding Girard nets and sequent proofs, technical delicacy is required to ensure correctness is polynomial-time (quadratic). These results transcend MLL1 via a methodological insight: for canonical quantifiers, the standard parallel/sequential dichotomy of proof nets is insufficient; an implicit/explicit witness dichotomy is needed. Current work extends unification nets to additives and uses them to extend combinatorial proofs [Proofs without syntax, Annals of Mathematics, 2006] to classical first-order logic.\",\"PeriodicalId\":389131,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Proceedings of the 33rd Annual ACM/IEEE Symposium on Logic in Computer Science\",\"volume\":\"21 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2018-02-09\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"12\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Proceedings of the 33rd Annual ACM/IEEE Symposium on Logic in Computer Science\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1145/3209108.3209159\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Proceedings of the 33rd Annual ACM/IEEE Symposium on Logic in Computer Science","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1145/3209108.3209159","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 12

摘要

MLL(无单元乘法线性逻辑)的证明网是证明的简明图形表示,它们是规范的,因为它们抽象了语法冗余,例如非交互规则的顺序。我们认为由于存在冗余的存在见证,Girard对一阶MLL1的扩展不能是正则化的,并提出了没有冗余存在见证的正则化MLL1证明网,称为统一网。例如,虽然有无限多个无切割的吉拉德网∀x Px≠∃x Px,对于∃x每一个任意的见证都有一个,但有一个唯一的无切割的统一网,没有指定的见证。统一网的切消是局部线性时间,而吉拉德的切消是非局部指数时间。由于一些统一网比相应的吉拉德网和序列证明要小得多,因此需要技术上的精细性来保证其正确性是多项式时间(二次)的。这些结果通过方法论的洞察力超越了MLL1:对于规范量词,证明网的标准平行/顺序二分法是不够的;需要一种隐式/显式证人二分法。目前的工作将统一网扩展到加法,并使用它们将组合证明扩展到经典一阶逻辑[无语法证明,数学年鉴,2006]。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Unification nets: canonical proof net quantifiers
Proof nets for MLL (unit-free Multiplicative Linear Logic) are concise graphical representations of proofs which are canonical in the sense that they abstract away syntactic redundancy such as the order of non-interacting rules. We argue that Girard's extension to MLL1 (first-order MLL) fails to be canonical because of redundant existential witnesses, and present canonical MLL1 proof nets called unification nets without them. For example, while there are infinitely many cut-free Girard nets ∀x Px ⊢ ∃x Px, one per arbitrary witness for ∃x, there is a unique cut-free unification net, with no specified witness. Cut elimination for unification nets is local and linear time, while Girard's is non-local and exponential time. Since some unification nets are exponentially smaller than corresponding Girard nets and sequent proofs, technical delicacy is required to ensure correctness is polynomial-time (quadratic). These results transcend MLL1 via a methodological insight: for canonical quantifiers, the standard parallel/sequential dichotomy of proof nets is insufficient; an implicit/explicit witness dichotomy is needed. Current work extends unification nets to additives and uses them to extend combinatorial proofs [Proofs without syntax, Annals of Mathematics, 2006] to classical first-order logic.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信