[关于安乐死争论的评论]。

Diskussionsforum medizinische Ethik Pub Date : 1991-05-01
E Zwierlein
{"title":"[关于安乐死争论的评论]。","authors":"E Zwierlein","doi":"","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>On the one hand euthanasia raises the question of humane dying (1). On the other side it is connected with the question of \"wrongful existence\" (2). The ambiguity of the term \"human/humane life\" might be explained in the following way: in respect of group 1 one might say that nobody is privileged to define materially or pragmatically the one who holds the dignity of man. In consequence no one may be killed because he lacks this type of criteria. Concerning group 2: a) No one may be expected to kill an innocent, defenceless human being; and there does not exist any right of demanding such a thing. b) Everyone has the right to get medicine for lessening pain. c) In case of b) death may not be intended on purpose, but may be accepted as a side-effect of medical treatment. d) Though you can formulate a rule of thumb there will occur tragical dilemmas with regard to cases of coma.</p>","PeriodicalId":77110,"journal":{"name":"Diskussionsforum medizinische Ethik","volume":" 5","pages":"XXIX-XXXI"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1991-05-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"[Comments on the debate about euthanasia].\",\"authors\":\"E Zwierlein\",\"doi\":\"\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>On the one hand euthanasia raises the question of humane dying (1). On the other side it is connected with the question of \\\"wrongful existence\\\" (2). The ambiguity of the term \\\"human/humane life\\\" might be explained in the following way: in respect of group 1 one might say that nobody is privileged to define materially or pragmatically the one who holds the dignity of man. In consequence no one may be killed because he lacks this type of criteria. Concerning group 2: a) No one may be expected to kill an innocent, defenceless human being; and there does not exist any right of demanding such a thing. b) Everyone has the right to get medicine for lessening pain. c) In case of b) death may not be intended on purpose, but may be accepted as a side-effect of medical treatment. d) Though you can formulate a rule of thumb there will occur tragical dilemmas with regard to cases of coma.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":77110,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Diskussionsforum medizinische Ethik\",\"volume\":\" 5\",\"pages\":\"XXIX-XXXI\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"1991-05-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Diskussionsforum medizinische Ethik\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Diskussionsforum medizinische Ethik","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

一方面,安乐死提出了人道死亡的问题(1)。另一方面,它与“错误存在”的问题(2)有关。“人类/人道生活”一词的模糊性可以用以下方式解释:就第一组而言,人们可能会说,没有人有权在物质上或实用上定义谁拥有人的尊严。因此,没有人会因为缺乏这类标准而被杀害。关于第2组:a)不得期望任何人杀害无辜、手无寸铁的人;也没有任何权利要求这样的事情。b)每个人都有权获得减轻疼痛的药物。c)在b)的情况下,死亡可能不是故意的,但可以作为药物治疗的副作用接受。d)虽然你可以制定一个经验法则,但在昏迷的情况下会出现悲剧性的困境。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
[Comments on the debate about euthanasia].

On the one hand euthanasia raises the question of humane dying (1). On the other side it is connected with the question of "wrongful existence" (2). The ambiguity of the term "human/humane life" might be explained in the following way: in respect of group 1 one might say that nobody is privileged to define materially or pragmatically the one who holds the dignity of man. In consequence no one may be killed because he lacks this type of criteria. Concerning group 2: a) No one may be expected to kill an innocent, defenceless human being; and there does not exist any right of demanding such a thing. b) Everyone has the right to get medicine for lessening pain. c) In case of b) death may not be intended on purpose, but may be accepted as a side-effect of medical treatment. d) Though you can formulate a rule of thumb there will occur tragical dilemmas with regard to cases of coma.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信