江苏大学、内罗毕大学与全球排名前几名大学的差距:通过解决这些差距来缩小差距

J. M. Thige, Ling Hongbo, Ssali Max William, Duncan O. Hongo, Flavian Athiambo Othiambo, Consolata Wairimu Nderitu, Joice Meshi Foku
{"title":"江苏大学、内罗毕大学与全球排名前几名大学的差距:通过解决这些差距来缩小差距","authors":"J. M. Thige, Ling Hongbo, Ssali Max William, Duncan O. Hongo, Flavian Athiambo Othiambo, Consolata Wairimu Nderitu, Joice Meshi Foku","doi":"10.11648/J.AJMSE.20210604.13","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Higher education institutions (HEIs) employ varying parameters to increase their assessment and consideration as institutions of choice for learners and competitiveness in comparison to other institutions offering similar content output. All institutions of higher Education gear towards growing their capacity in both qualitative and quantitative domains as they seek to change positively the society within and without the HEIs jurisdiction. The growing need for visibility and demand for higher education has left many higher education institutions with a mirage of challenges on how to improve access while maintaining quality. This research focused broadly on; ranking determinants and development of Higher Education Institutions (HEIs), and the impact and inter-relational effects the determinants of academic quality postulates on academic quality development, while comparatively critiquing the academic dynamics for University of Nairobi (UON) & Jiangsu University (UJS). Specifically, and regarding the ranking systems, academic quality of UJS and UON, certain contemporary study design guided current study. The depth, quality and reliability of ranking determinants as the nature of HEIs internal quality assessment and external visibility is investigated as it largely underscores on the nature and weight of ranking variances implored by the various ranking systems of HEIs a midst their developmental antecedents under higher academia to underscore the comparative significance, directions and (inter)-correlational characteristics amid UJS & UON’s contemporary higher education variances in their process of academic developmental antecedents and process. The research then delves at the impact of key parameters (teaching, research, attitude, performance and internationalization) on changing the academic quality of UON and UJS and on a comparative domain, finally the study tackles the effects of inter-relational associations of key parameters to the academic quality at both vertical and cross-section analogy in a bid to address their relevance and effects of academic quality and collaboration amid UON and UJS. The methodological underpinning implied to actuate the objectives is mixed in approach. Its qualitatively intensive where the quality and reliability of ranking systems is delved from a review process of the relevant literature concerning HEI’s, while an intensive-descriptive to qualitative review technique is implied resulting to a critical analysis of relevant literature. The study compares and contrasts the ranking variances for UON & UJS higher academia being quantitative intensive and integrated in approach while using primary data to quantify the fact that there exist variances and impacts amid the higher academia of UON & UJS.","PeriodicalId":438321,"journal":{"name":"American Journal of Management Science and Engineering","volume":"1 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-08-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Imploring the Gap Between Top Ranked Global Universities and Jiangsu University & the University of Nairobi with the Aim of De-gaping Through Addressing These Disparities\",\"authors\":\"J. M. Thige, Ling Hongbo, Ssali Max William, Duncan O. Hongo, Flavian Athiambo Othiambo, Consolata Wairimu Nderitu, Joice Meshi Foku\",\"doi\":\"10.11648/J.AJMSE.20210604.13\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Higher education institutions (HEIs) employ varying parameters to increase their assessment and consideration as institutions of choice for learners and competitiveness in comparison to other institutions offering similar content output. All institutions of higher Education gear towards growing their capacity in both qualitative and quantitative domains as they seek to change positively the society within and without the HEIs jurisdiction. The growing need for visibility and demand for higher education has left many higher education institutions with a mirage of challenges on how to improve access while maintaining quality. This research focused broadly on; ranking determinants and development of Higher Education Institutions (HEIs), and the impact and inter-relational effects the determinants of academic quality postulates on academic quality development, while comparatively critiquing the academic dynamics for University of Nairobi (UON) & Jiangsu University (UJS). Specifically, and regarding the ranking systems, academic quality of UJS and UON, certain contemporary study design guided current study. The depth, quality and reliability of ranking determinants as the nature of HEIs internal quality assessment and external visibility is investigated as it largely underscores on the nature and weight of ranking variances implored by the various ranking systems of HEIs a midst their developmental antecedents under higher academia to underscore the comparative significance, directions and (inter)-correlational characteristics amid UJS & UON’s contemporary higher education variances in their process of academic developmental antecedents and process. The research then delves at the impact of key parameters (teaching, research, attitude, performance and internationalization) on changing the academic quality of UON and UJS and on a comparative domain, finally the study tackles the effects of inter-relational associations of key parameters to the academic quality at both vertical and cross-section analogy in a bid to address their relevance and effects of academic quality and collaboration amid UON and UJS. The methodological underpinning implied to actuate the objectives is mixed in approach. Its qualitatively intensive where the quality and reliability of ranking systems is delved from a review process of the relevant literature concerning HEI’s, while an intensive-descriptive to qualitative review technique is implied resulting to a critical analysis of relevant literature. The study compares and contrasts the ranking variances for UON & UJS higher academia being quantitative intensive and integrated in approach while using primary data to quantify the fact that there exist variances and impacts amid the higher academia of UON & UJS.\",\"PeriodicalId\":438321,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"American Journal of Management Science and Engineering\",\"volume\":\"1 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-08-05\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"American Journal of Management Science and Engineering\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.11648/J.AJMSE.20210604.13\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"American Journal of Management Science and Engineering","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.11648/J.AJMSE.20210604.13","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

高等教育机构(HEIs)采用不同的参数来提高其作为学习者首选机构的评估和考虑,以及与提供类似内容输出的其他机构相比的竞争力。所有高等教育机构都在努力提高其在质量和数量领域的能力,因为它们寻求在高等教育机构管辖范围内外积极改变社会。对高等教育日益增长的知名度和需求给许多高等教育机构带来了海市蜃楼般的挑战,即如何在保持质量的同时提高入学率。这项研究主要集中在;高等教育机构(HEIs)的排名决定因素和发展,以及学术质量假设的决定因素对学术质量发展的影响和相互关系,同时比较批评内罗毕大学(UON)和江苏大学(UJS)的学术动态。具体来说,在排名制度、UJS和UON的学术质量方面,一定的当代研究设计指导了当前的研究。排名决定因素的深度、质量和可靠性作为高等学校内部质量评估和外部可见性的本质进行了调查,因为它在很大程度上强调了高等学校的各种排名系统所要求的排名差异的性质和权重,以强调其相对重要性。UJS和UON当代高等教育发展的方向和(相互)相关特征在其学术发展的前因后果和过程中存在差异。然后研究了关键参数(教学、研究、态度、绩效和国际化)对改变UON和UJS学术质量的影响,并在比较领域进行了研究,最后研究了关键参数之间的相互关联对学术质量的影响,并在纵向和横截面上进行了类比,以解决它们对UON和UJS学术质量和协作的相关性和影响。为实现这些目标所隐含的方法论基础在方法上是混合的。它的质量密集,其中排名系统的质量和可靠性是从有关高等教育的相关文献的审查过程中深入研究的,同时隐含了一种密集的描述性质的审查技术,从而对相关文献进行批判性分析。本研究比较对比了UON & UJS高等院校在方法上的量化集约化和一体化,同时利用原始数据量化了UON & UJS高等院校存在差异和影响的事实。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Imploring the Gap Between Top Ranked Global Universities and Jiangsu University & the University of Nairobi with the Aim of De-gaping Through Addressing These Disparities
Higher education institutions (HEIs) employ varying parameters to increase their assessment and consideration as institutions of choice for learners and competitiveness in comparison to other institutions offering similar content output. All institutions of higher Education gear towards growing their capacity in both qualitative and quantitative domains as they seek to change positively the society within and without the HEIs jurisdiction. The growing need for visibility and demand for higher education has left many higher education institutions with a mirage of challenges on how to improve access while maintaining quality. This research focused broadly on; ranking determinants and development of Higher Education Institutions (HEIs), and the impact and inter-relational effects the determinants of academic quality postulates on academic quality development, while comparatively critiquing the academic dynamics for University of Nairobi (UON) & Jiangsu University (UJS). Specifically, and regarding the ranking systems, academic quality of UJS and UON, certain contemporary study design guided current study. The depth, quality and reliability of ranking determinants as the nature of HEIs internal quality assessment and external visibility is investigated as it largely underscores on the nature and weight of ranking variances implored by the various ranking systems of HEIs a midst their developmental antecedents under higher academia to underscore the comparative significance, directions and (inter)-correlational characteristics amid UJS & UON’s contemporary higher education variances in their process of academic developmental antecedents and process. The research then delves at the impact of key parameters (teaching, research, attitude, performance and internationalization) on changing the academic quality of UON and UJS and on a comparative domain, finally the study tackles the effects of inter-relational associations of key parameters to the academic quality at both vertical and cross-section analogy in a bid to address their relevance and effects of academic quality and collaboration amid UON and UJS. The methodological underpinning implied to actuate the objectives is mixed in approach. Its qualitatively intensive where the quality and reliability of ranking systems is delved from a review process of the relevant literature concerning HEI’s, while an intensive-descriptive to qualitative review technique is implied resulting to a critical analysis of relevant literature. The study compares and contrasts the ranking variances for UON & UJS higher academia being quantitative intensive and integrated in approach while using primary data to quantify the fact that there exist variances and impacts amid the higher academia of UON & UJS.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信