千变万化的现象学与系谱学

S. Slote
{"title":"千变万化的现象学与系谱学","authors":"S. Slote","doi":"10.1353/DJJ.2009.0027","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"I shall begin with a question: what, exactly, is Stephen doing on Sandymount strand? The short answer would be that he is interpreting the world around him, contemplating the various phenomena disclosed to him by his senses. More accurately, however, at least at the start of the episode, he is interpreting or attempting to interpret how his faculties of interpretation operate. The episode begins with Stephen contemplating the quality of the phenomenon of visual perception, the ‘Ineluctable modality of the visible’ (U 3.01), as it were. But Stephen is not contemplating the qualia of visibility as such, rather his thoughts and perceptions and thoughts about his perceptions are mediated by or inflected through contemplations of Aristotle and others. The ‘[s]ignatures of all things I am here to read’ (U 3.02) are countersigned by others, such as, in this case, Jacob Boehme, the German mystic and cobbler who wrote the treatise Signatura Rerum. The matrix of Stephen’s mind is conditioned by others, by all the others that come before, that pre-date and pre-sign his being. At least on some level, what Stephen is doing on Sandymount strand is he is acting as a ventriloquist – a word to which I shall return at the conclusion of this essay. But, again, what is Stephen doing on Sandymount strand? This question could be rephrased in Latin: unde et quo, whither and whence? Unsurprisingly, the answer to this question is not entirely straightforward since Stephen’s presence on the strand, after having taught at Dalkey, is not without some logistical complications. Sandymount is too far away from Dalkey for Stephen to have walked in the time available. Furthermore, in ‘Hades’, Bloom sees Stephen at or near Watery Lane (U 6.39). This raises the problem of the temporal conjunction between ‘Proteus’ and ‘Hades’, something which Joyce revised between the two schemata. On the Linati schema the two episodes were designed as consecutive, with ‘Proteus’ set between ten and eleven and ‘Hades’ between eleven and twelve; while on the later Gilbert schema they are concurrent, both taking place between eleven and tweleve. Following from the Linati schema, Danis Rose proposed that Stephen must have taken the 10","PeriodicalId":105673,"journal":{"name":"Dublin James Joyce Journal","volume":"52 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2012-03-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Protean Phenomenology and Genealogy\",\"authors\":\"S. Slote\",\"doi\":\"10.1353/DJJ.2009.0027\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"I shall begin with a question: what, exactly, is Stephen doing on Sandymount strand? The short answer would be that he is interpreting the world around him, contemplating the various phenomena disclosed to him by his senses. More accurately, however, at least at the start of the episode, he is interpreting or attempting to interpret how his faculties of interpretation operate. The episode begins with Stephen contemplating the quality of the phenomenon of visual perception, the ‘Ineluctable modality of the visible’ (U 3.01), as it were. But Stephen is not contemplating the qualia of visibility as such, rather his thoughts and perceptions and thoughts about his perceptions are mediated by or inflected through contemplations of Aristotle and others. The ‘[s]ignatures of all things I am here to read’ (U 3.02) are countersigned by others, such as, in this case, Jacob Boehme, the German mystic and cobbler who wrote the treatise Signatura Rerum. The matrix of Stephen’s mind is conditioned by others, by all the others that come before, that pre-date and pre-sign his being. At least on some level, what Stephen is doing on Sandymount strand is he is acting as a ventriloquist – a word to which I shall return at the conclusion of this essay. But, again, what is Stephen doing on Sandymount strand? This question could be rephrased in Latin: unde et quo, whither and whence? Unsurprisingly, the answer to this question is not entirely straightforward since Stephen’s presence on the strand, after having taught at Dalkey, is not without some logistical complications. Sandymount is too far away from Dalkey for Stephen to have walked in the time available. Furthermore, in ‘Hades’, Bloom sees Stephen at or near Watery Lane (U 6.39). This raises the problem of the temporal conjunction between ‘Proteus’ and ‘Hades’, something which Joyce revised between the two schemata. On the Linati schema the two episodes were designed as consecutive, with ‘Proteus’ set between ten and eleven and ‘Hades’ between eleven and twelve; while on the later Gilbert schema they are concurrent, both taking place between eleven and tweleve. Following from the Linati schema, Danis Rose proposed that Stephen must have taken the 10\",\"PeriodicalId\":105673,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Dublin James Joyce Journal\",\"volume\":\"52 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2012-03-02\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"2\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Dublin James Joyce Journal\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1353/DJJ.2009.0027\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Dublin James Joyce Journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1353/DJJ.2009.0027","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

摘要

我将以一个问题开始:斯蒂芬到底在山山海滩做什么?简短的回答是,他正在解读他周围的世界,思考他的感官所揭示的各种现象。然而,更准确地说,至少在这一集的开头,他正在解释或试图解释他的解释能力是如何运作的。这一集开始于斯蒂芬思考视觉感知现象的性质,即“可见的不可避免的形态”(U 3.01)。但司提反并不是在思考可见性的感觉,相反,他的思想和感知以及关于他的感知的思想是由亚里士多德和其他人的思考所调解或影响的。“我在此阅读的所有事物的签名”(U 3.02)由其他人附签,例如,在这种情况下,德国神秘主义者和鞋匠雅各布·伯姆(Jacob Boehme)写了论文《签名》(Signatura Rerum)。斯蒂芬的心智矩阵是由其他人决定的,由之前的所有人决定的,这些人早于他的存在,也早于他的存在。至少在某种程度上,斯蒂芬在山山河上所做的是扮演一个腹语者的角色,这个词我将在这篇文章的结尾回来。但是,再问一次,斯蒂芬在山山河道上做什么?这个问题可以用拉丁语改写为:unde et quo, where and where ?不出所料,这个问题的答案并不完全直截了当,因为斯蒂芬在达尔基任教后出现在海滩上,并非没有一些后勤问题。山山离达尔基太远了,斯蒂芬在有限的时间内不可能步行过去。此外,在《冥府》中,布鲁姆在水巷或水巷附近看到了斯蒂芬(U 6.39)。这就提出了“Proteus”和“Hades”之间的时间连接的问题,这是乔伊斯在两个图式之间修改的。在利纳蒂图式中,这两个情节被设计成连续的,“普罗透斯”设定在10点到11点之间,“哈迪斯”设定在11点到12点之间;而在后来的吉尔伯特图式中,它们是同时发生的,都发生在十一点到十二点之间。根据利纳蒂图式,丹尼斯·罗斯提出斯蒂芬一定是拿了10分
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Protean Phenomenology and Genealogy
I shall begin with a question: what, exactly, is Stephen doing on Sandymount strand? The short answer would be that he is interpreting the world around him, contemplating the various phenomena disclosed to him by his senses. More accurately, however, at least at the start of the episode, he is interpreting or attempting to interpret how his faculties of interpretation operate. The episode begins with Stephen contemplating the quality of the phenomenon of visual perception, the ‘Ineluctable modality of the visible’ (U 3.01), as it were. But Stephen is not contemplating the qualia of visibility as such, rather his thoughts and perceptions and thoughts about his perceptions are mediated by or inflected through contemplations of Aristotle and others. The ‘[s]ignatures of all things I am here to read’ (U 3.02) are countersigned by others, such as, in this case, Jacob Boehme, the German mystic and cobbler who wrote the treatise Signatura Rerum. The matrix of Stephen’s mind is conditioned by others, by all the others that come before, that pre-date and pre-sign his being. At least on some level, what Stephen is doing on Sandymount strand is he is acting as a ventriloquist – a word to which I shall return at the conclusion of this essay. But, again, what is Stephen doing on Sandymount strand? This question could be rephrased in Latin: unde et quo, whither and whence? Unsurprisingly, the answer to this question is not entirely straightforward since Stephen’s presence on the strand, after having taught at Dalkey, is not without some logistical complications. Sandymount is too far away from Dalkey for Stephen to have walked in the time available. Furthermore, in ‘Hades’, Bloom sees Stephen at or near Watery Lane (U 6.39). This raises the problem of the temporal conjunction between ‘Proteus’ and ‘Hades’, something which Joyce revised between the two schemata. On the Linati schema the two episodes were designed as consecutive, with ‘Proteus’ set between ten and eleven and ‘Hades’ between eleven and twelve; while on the later Gilbert schema they are concurrent, both taking place between eleven and tweleve. Following from the Linati schema, Danis Rose proposed that Stephen must have taken the 10
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信