静息时用地震心动图测定最大摄氧量

M. Hansen, B. Grønfeldt, Tue Rømer, Mathilde Fogelstrøm, Kasper Sørensen, S. Schmidt, J. Helge
{"title":"静息时用地震心动图测定最大摄氧量","authors":"M. Hansen, B. Grønfeldt, Tue Rømer, Mathilde Fogelstrøm, Kasper Sørensen, S. Schmidt, J. Helge","doi":"10.23919/cinc53138.2021.9662756","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Introduction: Assessment of maximal oxygen consumption (VO<inf>2</inf>max) is an important clinical tool when examining both healthy and unhealthy populations, as a low VO<inf>2</inf>max is associated with cardiovascular disease and all-cause mortality. Aim: This study investigated the accuracy of a non-exercise test for assessment of VO<inf>2</inf>max using seismocardiography (SCG). Methods: 97 participants (20–45 years, 50 males) underwent a nonexercise test using SCG at rest in the supine position (SCG VO<inf>2</inf>max) and a graded exercise test to voluntary exhaustion on a cycle ergometer with indirect calorimetry (IC VO<inf>2</inf>max). An interim analysis was applied after 50 participants had completed testing (SCG VO<inf>2</inf>max 1.0) allowing for the algorithm to be modified (SCG VO<inf>2</inf>max 2.1). Results: SCG VO<inf>2</inf>max 2.1 (<tex>$n=47$</tex>, test set) estimation was <tex>$3.5 \\pm 1.8\\ ml\\cdot min^{-1}\\cdot kg^{-1}\\ (p < 0.001)$</tex> lower compared to IC VO<inf>2</inf>max, with a Pearson correlation of <tex>$r=0.65 (p < 0.0001)$</tex> and a standard error of estimate of 7.1 ml·min<sup>−1</sup> ·kg<sup>−1</sup>. The coefficient of variation between tests was <tex>$8\\ \\pm 1\\%$</tex>. Conclusion: The accuracy of VO<inf>2</inf>max assessment using SCG requires further optimization prior to clinical application, as SCG VO<inf>2</inf>max was systematically lower than IC VO<inf>2</inf>max, and only a moderate correlation together with considerable variation were observed between tests.","PeriodicalId":126746,"journal":{"name":"2021 Computing in Cardiology (CinC)","volume":"48 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-09-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Determination of Maximal Oxygen Uptake Using Seismocardiography at Rest\",\"authors\":\"M. Hansen, B. Grønfeldt, Tue Rømer, Mathilde Fogelstrøm, Kasper Sørensen, S. Schmidt, J. Helge\",\"doi\":\"10.23919/cinc53138.2021.9662756\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Introduction: Assessment of maximal oxygen consumption (VO<inf>2</inf>max) is an important clinical tool when examining both healthy and unhealthy populations, as a low VO<inf>2</inf>max is associated with cardiovascular disease and all-cause mortality. Aim: This study investigated the accuracy of a non-exercise test for assessment of VO<inf>2</inf>max using seismocardiography (SCG). Methods: 97 participants (20–45 years, 50 males) underwent a nonexercise test using SCG at rest in the supine position (SCG VO<inf>2</inf>max) and a graded exercise test to voluntary exhaustion on a cycle ergometer with indirect calorimetry (IC VO<inf>2</inf>max). An interim analysis was applied after 50 participants had completed testing (SCG VO<inf>2</inf>max 1.0) allowing for the algorithm to be modified (SCG VO<inf>2</inf>max 2.1). Results: SCG VO<inf>2</inf>max 2.1 (<tex>$n=47$</tex>, test set) estimation was <tex>$3.5 \\\\pm 1.8\\\\ ml\\\\cdot min^{-1}\\\\cdot kg^{-1}\\\\ (p < 0.001)$</tex> lower compared to IC VO<inf>2</inf>max, with a Pearson correlation of <tex>$r=0.65 (p < 0.0001)$</tex> and a standard error of estimate of 7.1 ml·min<sup>−1</sup> ·kg<sup>−1</sup>. The coefficient of variation between tests was <tex>$8\\\\ \\\\pm 1\\\\%$</tex>. Conclusion: The accuracy of VO<inf>2</inf>max assessment using SCG requires further optimization prior to clinical application, as SCG VO<inf>2</inf>max was systematically lower than IC VO<inf>2</inf>max, and only a moderate correlation together with considerable variation were observed between tests.\",\"PeriodicalId\":126746,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"2021 Computing in Cardiology (CinC)\",\"volume\":\"48 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-09-13\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"2\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"2021 Computing in Cardiology (CinC)\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.23919/cinc53138.2021.9662756\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2021 Computing in Cardiology (CinC)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.23919/cinc53138.2021.9662756","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

摘要

在检查健康和不健康人群时,最大耗氧量(VO2max)的评估是一个重要的临床工具,因为低VO2max与心血管疾病和全因死亡率有关。目的:本研究探讨了用地震心动图(SCG)评估VO2max的非运动试验的准确性。方法:97名参与者(20-45岁,50名男性)在仰卧位休息时使用SCG (SCG VO2max)进行非运动测试,并在间接量热法(IC VO2max)的循环劳力计上进行自愿疲劳分级运动测试。在50名参与者完成测试(SCG VO2max 1.0)后,应用中期分析,允许修改算法(SCG VO2max 2.1)。结果:SCG VO2max 2.1 (n=47,测试集)估计值比IC VO2max低3.5 \pm 1.8\ ml\cdot min^{-1}\cdot kg^{-1} (p < 0.001)$, Pearson相关r=0.65 (p < 0.0001)$,估计的标准误差为7.1 ml·min−1·kg−1。试验之间的变异系数为$8\ \pm 1\%$。结论:SCG评估VO2max的准确性在临床应用前需要进一步优化,因为SCG VO2max系统性地低于IC VO2max,且两者之间仅存在中度相关性,且差异较大。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Determination of Maximal Oxygen Uptake Using Seismocardiography at Rest
Introduction: Assessment of maximal oxygen consumption (VO2max) is an important clinical tool when examining both healthy and unhealthy populations, as a low VO2max is associated with cardiovascular disease and all-cause mortality. Aim: This study investigated the accuracy of a non-exercise test for assessment of VO2max using seismocardiography (SCG). Methods: 97 participants (20–45 years, 50 males) underwent a nonexercise test using SCG at rest in the supine position (SCG VO2max) and a graded exercise test to voluntary exhaustion on a cycle ergometer with indirect calorimetry (IC VO2max). An interim analysis was applied after 50 participants had completed testing (SCG VO2max 1.0) allowing for the algorithm to be modified (SCG VO2max 2.1). Results: SCG VO2max 2.1 ($n=47$, test set) estimation was $3.5 \pm 1.8\ ml\cdot min^{-1}\cdot kg^{-1}\ (p < 0.001)$ lower compared to IC VO2max, with a Pearson correlation of $r=0.65 (p < 0.0001)$ and a standard error of estimate of 7.1 ml·min−1 ·kg−1. The coefficient of variation between tests was $8\ \pm 1\%$. Conclusion: The accuracy of VO2max assessment using SCG requires further optimization prior to clinical application, as SCG VO2max was systematically lower than IC VO2max, and only a moderate correlation together with considerable variation were observed between tests.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信