云计算中具有优先级和非优先级的任务调度性能评价

Nidhi Bansal, M. Dutta
{"title":"云计算中具有优先级和非优先级的任务调度性能评价","authors":"Nidhi Bansal, M. Dutta","doi":"10.1109/ICCIC.2014.7238289","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Minimizing the total allocation cost is an unavoidable issue needing to be deal with in task scheduling of cloud computing for processing all the tasks. In this paper, the comparative study has been done among the priority algorithms and secondly between the priority and non-priority task scheduling algorithms. In order to emulate the precedence relation of task, the task scheduling algorithms enumerate the priority of tasks according to the specific attributes of task, and then sort tasks by priority. The total allocation costs for each scheduling algorithm are calculated. The experimental results based on cloudsim3.0 toolkit with NetBeans IDE8.0 shows that the ABC algorithm (priority based) achieves good performance in cost parameter with the comparison of QoS driven, virtual machine tree (both are priority based) and traditional scheduling algorithms but the comparison of ABC (priority based) and PSO (non priority based) shows that the non priority algorithm gives best performance due to less waiting time to allocation task.","PeriodicalId":187874,"journal":{"name":"2014 IEEE International Conference on Computational Intelligence and Computing Research","volume":"31 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2014-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"7","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Performance evaluation of task scheduling with priority and non-priority in cloud computing\",\"authors\":\"Nidhi Bansal, M. Dutta\",\"doi\":\"10.1109/ICCIC.2014.7238289\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Minimizing the total allocation cost is an unavoidable issue needing to be deal with in task scheduling of cloud computing for processing all the tasks. In this paper, the comparative study has been done among the priority algorithms and secondly between the priority and non-priority task scheduling algorithms. In order to emulate the precedence relation of task, the task scheduling algorithms enumerate the priority of tasks according to the specific attributes of task, and then sort tasks by priority. The total allocation costs for each scheduling algorithm are calculated. The experimental results based on cloudsim3.0 toolkit with NetBeans IDE8.0 shows that the ABC algorithm (priority based) achieves good performance in cost parameter with the comparison of QoS driven, virtual machine tree (both are priority based) and traditional scheduling algorithms but the comparison of ABC (priority based) and PSO (non priority based) shows that the non priority algorithm gives best performance due to less waiting time to allocation task.\",\"PeriodicalId\":187874,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"2014 IEEE International Conference on Computational Intelligence and Computing Research\",\"volume\":\"31 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2014-12-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"7\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"2014 IEEE International Conference on Computational Intelligence and Computing Research\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1109/ICCIC.2014.7238289\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2014 IEEE International Conference on Computational Intelligence and Computing Research","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/ICCIC.2014.7238289","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 7

摘要

最小化总分配成本是云计算任务调度中不可避免要解决的问题。本文首先对优先级调度算法进行了比较研究,其次对优先级和非优先级任务调度算法进行了比较研究。为了模拟任务的优先级关系,任务调度算法根据任务的具体属性枚举任务的优先级,然后按优先级对任务进行排序。计算了各调度算法的总分配成本。基于cloudsim3.0工具箱和NetBeans IDE8.0的实验结果表明,ABC算法(基于优先级)与QoS驱动、虚拟机树(均基于优先级)和传统调度算法相比,在成本参数上取得了较好的性能,而ABC算法(基于优先级)和PSO算法(非基于优先级)的比较表明,非优先级算法由于分配任务的等待时间较少,具有最佳性能。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Performance evaluation of task scheduling with priority and non-priority in cloud computing
Minimizing the total allocation cost is an unavoidable issue needing to be deal with in task scheduling of cloud computing for processing all the tasks. In this paper, the comparative study has been done among the priority algorithms and secondly between the priority and non-priority task scheduling algorithms. In order to emulate the precedence relation of task, the task scheduling algorithms enumerate the priority of tasks according to the specific attributes of task, and then sort tasks by priority. The total allocation costs for each scheduling algorithm are calculated. The experimental results based on cloudsim3.0 toolkit with NetBeans IDE8.0 shows that the ABC algorithm (priority based) achieves good performance in cost parameter with the comparison of QoS driven, virtual machine tree (both are priority based) and traditional scheduling algorithms but the comparison of ABC (priority based) and PSO (non priority based) shows that the non priority algorithm gives best performance due to less waiting time to allocation task.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信