巴西法律文件聚类特征提取方法比较

João Pedro Lima, J. A. F. Costa, Diógenes Carlos Araújo
{"title":"巴西法律文件聚类特征提取方法比较","authors":"João Pedro Lima, J. A. F. Costa, Diógenes Carlos Araújo","doi":"10.1109/LA-CCI48322.2021.9769839","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This article aims to evaluate the impact of different textual feature extraction methods in the task of clustering Brazilian legal texts. We compared Binary Bag of Words, Bag of Words, Term Frequency-Inverse Document Frequency, Word2vec and Doc2vec models in different dimensions and with different hyperparameters, totaling 45 models. Our experiment consists in evaluating the result of clustering done by K-Means algorithm over the vectors created by each model. The evaluation was done both quantitatively, using clustering evaluation metrics, and qualitatively, considering relevant aspects for the application of this type of algorithm in the legal environment, such as transparency and interpretability. Our experiments were conducted in a database of 30,000 documents in Brazilian Portuguese of judicial moves of the Tribunal de Justiça do Rio Grande do Norte (TJRN). The research results suggest that the TF-IDF method seems to be the most suitable for the task, outperforming the other models in considered metrics. The other methods appear to perform equally well, with the exception of Doc2vec, which performed poorly.","PeriodicalId":431041,"journal":{"name":"2021 IEEE Latin American Conference on Computational Intelligence (LA-CCI)","volume":"1 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-11-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Comparison of Feature Extraction Methods for Brazilian Legal Documents Clustering\",\"authors\":\"João Pedro Lima, J. A. F. Costa, Diógenes Carlos Araújo\",\"doi\":\"10.1109/LA-CCI48322.2021.9769839\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"This article aims to evaluate the impact of different textual feature extraction methods in the task of clustering Brazilian legal texts. We compared Binary Bag of Words, Bag of Words, Term Frequency-Inverse Document Frequency, Word2vec and Doc2vec models in different dimensions and with different hyperparameters, totaling 45 models. Our experiment consists in evaluating the result of clustering done by K-Means algorithm over the vectors created by each model. The evaluation was done both quantitatively, using clustering evaluation metrics, and qualitatively, considering relevant aspects for the application of this type of algorithm in the legal environment, such as transparency and interpretability. Our experiments were conducted in a database of 30,000 documents in Brazilian Portuguese of judicial moves of the Tribunal de Justiça do Rio Grande do Norte (TJRN). The research results suggest that the TF-IDF method seems to be the most suitable for the task, outperforming the other models in considered metrics. The other methods appear to perform equally well, with the exception of Doc2vec, which performed poorly.\",\"PeriodicalId\":431041,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"2021 IEEE Latin American Conference on Computational Intelligence (LA-CCI)\",\"volume\":\"1 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-11-02\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"2021 IEEE Latin American Conference on Computational Intelligence (LA-CCI)\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1109/LA-CCI48322.2021.9769839\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2021 IEEE Latin American Conference on Computational Intelligence (LA-CCI)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/LA-CCI48322.2021.9769839","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

摘要

本文旨在评估不同文本特征提取方法对巴西法律文本聚类任务的影响。我们比较了二元词袋模型、词袋模型、词频-逆文档频率模型、Word2vec模型和Doc2vec模型在不同维度和不同超参数下的差异,共45个模型。我们的实验包括在每个模型创建的向量上评估K-Means算法完成的聚类结果。评估是定量地进行的,使用聚类评估指标,并定性地考虑到在法律环境中应用这种算法的相关方面,如透明度和可解释性。我们的实验是在一个包含30,000份巴西葡萄牙语文件的数据库中进行的,这些文件是关于北里奥格兰德州司法法庭(TJRN)的司法行动。研究结果表明,TF-IDF方法似乎最适合该任务,在考虑的指标中优于其他模型。除了Doc2vec表现不佳之外,其他方法似乎都表现得同样好。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Comparison of Feature Extraction Methods for Brazilian Legal Documents Clustering
This article aims to evaluate the impact of different textual feature extraction methods in the task of clustering Brazilian legal texts. We compared Binary Bag of Words, Bag of Words, Term Frequency-Inverse Document Frequency, Word2vec and Doc2vec models in different dimensions and with different hyperparameters, totaling 45 models. Our experiment consists in evaluating the result of clustering done by K-Means algorithm over the vectors created by each model. The evaluation was done both quantitatively, using clustering evaluation metrics, and qualitatively, considering relevant aspects for the application of this type of algorithm in the legal environment, such as transparency and interpretability. Our experiments were conducted in a database of 30,000 documents in Brazilian Portuguese of judicial moves of the Tribunal de Justiça do Rio Grande do Norte (TJRN). The research results suggest that the TF-IDF method seems to be the most suitable for the task, outperforming the other models in considered metrics. The other methods appear to perform equally well, with the exception of Doc2vec, which performed poorly.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信