思想史和现代脑科学

Roger Smith
{"title":"思想史和现代脑科学","authors":"Roger Smith","doi":"10.1080/15615324.2000.10431665","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract Extract If there is one area of current intellectual life that feels without need of history, it is neuroscience and its allies in cognitive science and artificial intelligence (AI). Some scientists believe, even aggressively, that new research makes out of date any reference to mind, self, will, or consciousness as explanatory categories in their own right. The persistent use of these terms to describe states or realities, these scientists suggest, shows the regrettable power of habit and convention in everyday psychology. They would find strange or alien the idea that social science and history are essential sources of knowledge about ourselves, independent of the natural sciences. Perhaps I exaggerate. But many natural scientists would surely think that intellectual history, however interesting, is marginal to the project of understanding human nature.","PeriodicalId":360014,"journal":{"name":"Intellectual News","volume":"6 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2000-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Intellectual history and modern brain science\",\"authors\":\"Roger Smith\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/15615324.2000.10431665\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Abstract Extract If there is one area of current intellectual life that feels without need of history, it is neuroscience and its allies in cognitive science and artificial intelligence (AI). Some scientists believe, even aggressively, that new research makes out of date any reference to mind, self, will, or consciousness as explanatory categories in their own right. The persistent use of these terms to describe states or realities, these scientists suggest, shows the regrettable power of habit and convention in everyday psychology. They would find strange or alien the idea that social science and history are essential sources of knowledge about ourselves, independent of the natural sciences. Perhaps I exaggerate. But many natural scientists would surely think that intellectual history, however interesting, is marginal to the project of understanding human nature.\",\"PeriodicalId\":360014,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Intellectual News\",\"volume\":\"6 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2000-12-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Intellectual News\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/15615324.2000.10431665\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Intellectual News","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/15615324.2000.10431665","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

如果在当今的智力生活中有一个领域感觉不需要历史,那就是神经科学及其在认知科学和人工智能(AI)方面的盟友。一些科学家甚至激进地认为,新的研究使任何将心智、自我、意志或意识作为它们自己的解释范畴的说法都过时了。这些科学家认为,持续使用这些术语来描述状态或现实,显示了习惯和惯例在日常心理学中令人遗憾的力量。他们会觉得社会科学和历史是独立于自然科学之外的关于我们自身的重要知识来源的观点很奇怪或格格不入。也许我夸大其词了。但是,许多自然科学家肯定会认为,思想史无论多么有趣,对于理解人性的工程来说都是次要的。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Intellectual history and modern brain science
Abstract Extract If there is one area of current intellectual life that feels without need of history, it is neuroscience and its allies in cognitive science and artificial intelligence (AI). Some scientists believe, even aggressively, that new research makes out of date any reference to mind, self, will, or consciousness as explanatory categories in their own right. The persistent use of these terms to describe states or realities, these scientists suggest, shows the regrettable power of habit and convention in everyday psychology. They would find strange or alien the idea that social science and history are essential sources of knowledge about ourselves, independent of the natural sciences. Perhaps I exaggerate. But many natural scientists would surely think that intellectual history, however interesting, is marginal to the project of understanding human nature.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信