高校档案馆信息服务的用户评价

Woo-cheol Jeong, Hae-young Rieh
{"title":"高校档案馆信息服务的用户评价","authors":"Woo-cheol Jeong, Hae-young Rieh","doi":"10.14404/JKSARM.2016.16.1.195","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"In a situation where the recognition of archival services remains minimal, an evaluation of archival information services by users could provide a better understanding of users` practical needs and present helpful information for improved services. A service evaluation by users using questionnaires was conducted in university archives, which can similarly categorize their user groups and have frequent interactions with the users for the provision of services. Questionnaires suitable for the evaluation of university archives were developed based on the review of the evaluation tools in archival information services. From April to October 2015, 113 users` evaluation results were collected from 13 university archives. As a result of goodness of fit tests, the users` service evaluation items were categorized into four parts: Use Results, Provision of Information on Archives, Accessibility to Archives, and Interaction. For those four parts, evaluation by descriptive statistics, T-test, correlation analysis, and regression analysis were conducted. Users evaluated Interaction parts highly while they were less satisfied with Provision of Information on Archives. T-test results showed that university archives with search engines and with electronic records management systems were evaluated higher than archives without such technology. In the regression analysis, the Interaction and Provision of Information on Archives parts were found to have an influence on the Use Results part.","PeriodicalId":344902,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Korean Society of Archives and Records Management","volume":"1 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2016-02-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"4","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Users' Evaluation of Information Services in University Archives\",\"authors\":\"Woo-cheol Jeong, Hae-young Rieh\",\"doi\":\"10.14404/JKSARM.2016.16.1.195\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"In a situation where the recognition of archival services remains minimal, an evaluation of archival information services by users could provide a better understanding of users` practical needs and present helpful information for improved services. A service evaluation by users using questionnaires was conducted in university archives, which can similarly categorize their user groups and have frequent interactions with the users for the provision of services. Questionnaires suitable for the evaluation of university archives were developed based on the review of the evaluation tools in archival information services. From April to October 2015, 113 users` evaluation results were collected from 13 university archives. As a result of goodness of fit tests, the users` service evaluation items were categorized into four parts: Use Results, Provision of Information on Archives, Accessibility to Archives, and Interaction. For those four parts, evaluation by descriptive statistics, T-test, correlation analysis, and regression analysis were conducted. Users evaluated Interaction parts highly while they were less satisfied with Provision of Information on Archives. T-test results showed that university archives with search engines and with electronic records management systems were evaluated higher than archives without such technology. In the regression analysis, the Interaction and Provision of Information on Archives parts were found to have an influence on the Use Results part.\",\"PeriodicalId\":344902,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Korean Society of Archives and Records Management\",\"volume\":\"1 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2016-02-29\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"4\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Korean Society of Archives and Records Management\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.14404/JKSARM.2016.16.1.195\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Korean Society of Archives and Records Management","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.14404/JKSARM.2016.16.1.195","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 4

摘要

在对档案服务的认识仍然很少的情况下,用户对档案信息服务的评价可以更好地了解用户的实际需要,并为改进服务提供有用的信息。利用问卷调查的方式对高校档案馆进行用户服务评价,同样可以对其用户群体进行分类,并与用户进行频繁的互动以提供服务。在回顾档案信息服务评价工具的基础上,编制了适合高校档案评价的问卷。2015年4月至10月,从13所高校的档案中收集了113个用户的评价结果。通过拟合优度检验,将用户服务评价项目分为四个部分:使用结果、档案信息提供、档案可及性和互动。对这四部分进行描述性统计、t检验、相关分析和回归分析评价。用户对交互部分评价很高,而对档案信息的提供不太满意。t检验结果显示,有搜索引擎和电子档案管理系统的大学档案的评价高于没有搜索引擎和电子档案管理系统的大学档案。在回归分析中,发现档案信息的交互和提供部分对使用结果部分有影响。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Users' Evaluation of Information Services in University Archives
In a situation where the recognition of archival services remains minimal, an evaluation of archival information services by users could provide a better understanding of users` practical needs and present helpful information for improved services. A service evaluation by users using questionnaires was conducted in university archives, which can similarly categorize their user groups and have frequent interactions with the users for the provision of services. Questionnaires suitable for the evaluation of university archives were developed based on the review of the evaluation tools in archival information services. From April to October 2015, 113 users` evaluation results were collected from 13 university archives. As a result of goodness of fit tests, the users` service evaluation items were categorized into four parts: Use Results, Provision of Information on Archives, Accessibility to Archives, and Interaction. For those four parts, evaluation by descriptive statistics, T-test, correlation analysis, and regression analysis were conducted. Users evaluated Interaction parts highly while they were less satisfied with Provision of Information on Archives. T-test results showed that university archives with search engines and with electronic records management systems were evaluated higher than archives without such technology. In the regression analysis, the Interaction and Provision of Information on Archives parts were found to have an influence on the Use Results part.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信