帕西菲卡女性的出生地选择

Judith McAra-Couper, A. Farry, Ngatepaeru Marsters, Dinah Otukolo, J. Clemons, L. Smythe
{"title":"帕西菲卡女性的出生地选择","authors":"Judith McAra-Couper, A. Farry, Ngatepaeru Marsters, Dinah Otukolo, J. Clemons, L. Smythe","doi":"10.12784/nzcomjnl54.2018.2.15-21","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"A Corresponding Author: jmcaraco@ aut.ac.nz B Auckland University of Technology, Auckland C Midwife, Auckland Background: Birth is a socially constructed experience for Pasifika living in New Zealand that is shaped by their community and maternity provider’s influences. Pasifika women in the Counties Manukau region predominantly choose to birth in a tertiary facility despite there being primary facilities available. Aim: This study asked Pasifika women about their choices for place of birth within the Counties Manukau District Health Board region. Method: Six healthy, low risk Pasifika women, who had given birth in the Counties Manukau District Health Board region, participated in this study. All women were interviewed individually and conversations were analysed using thematic analysis, followed by a hermeneutic interpretation. Findings: The women shared a culture of “we birth at Middlemore [Hospital] and that is where you have babies”. Their data surprised us as researchers. Those who had been transferred postnatally to primary units tended to still prefer Middlemore. We use the word “prejudice” in recognising that we thought (backed by research evidence) that they would be more likely to have a normal birth in a primary unit, and would prefer that experience. They told us that Middlemore Hospital was close to home; it was a place they knew; and it was where they preferred to give birth. The Pasifika women’s understanding of choice of birthplace was influenced by their community and, perhaps, by their midwife. While they seemed to have minimal understanding of why they would choose to birth at a primary birthing unit, there was a sense that even if they had this knowledge, they would not have changed their minds. They had a trust of, and familiarity with, Middlemore Hospital that held firm. They had their prejudice; we had ours. Recognising these different views offers a different space for conversation. Conclusion: It is important that any new or re-designed birthing unit be planned in collaboration with Pasifika women if it is intended for their use. Further, it is important that midwives take the time to listen to Pasifika women, and those from other cultures, to understand their point of view.","PeriodicalId":137118,"journal":{"name":"New Zealand College of Midwives Journal","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2018-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Pasifika women's choice of birthplace\",\"authors\":\"Judith McAra-Couper, A. Farry, Ngatepaeru Marsters, Dinah Otukolo, J. Clemons, L. Smythe\",\"doi\":\"10.12784/nzcomjnl54.2018.2.15-21\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"A Corresponding Author: jmcaraco@ aut.ac.nz B Auckland University of Technology, Auckland C Midwife, Auckland Background: Birth is a socially constructed experience for Pasifika living in New Zealand that is shaped by their community and maternity provider’s influences. Pasifika women in the Counties Manukau region predominantly choose to birth in a tertiary facility despite there being primary facilities available. Aim: This study asked Pasifika women about their choices for place of birth within the Counties Manukau District Health Board region. Method: Six healthy, low risk Pasifika women, who had given birth in the Counties Manukau District Health Board region, participated in this study. All women were interviewed individually and conversations were analysed using thematic analysis, followed by a hermeneutic interpretation. Findings: The women shared a culture of “we birth at Middlemore [Hospital] and that is where you have babies”. Their data surprised us as researchers. Those who had been transferred postnatally to primary units tended to still prefer Middlemore. We use the word “prejudice” in recognising that we thought (backed by research evidence) that they would be more likely to have a normal birth in a primary unit, and would prefer that experience. They told us that Middlemore Hospital was close to home; it was a place they knew; and it was where they preferred to give birth. The Pasifika women’s understanding of choice of birthplace was influenced by their community and, perhaps, by their midwife. While they seemed to have minimal understanding of why they would choose to birth at a primary birthing unit, there was a sense that even if they had this knowledge, they would not have changed their minds. They had a trust of, and familiarity with, Middlemore Hospital that held firm. They had their prejudice; we had ours. Recognising these different views offers a different space for conversation. Conclusion: It is important that any new or re-designed birthing unit be planned in collaboration with Pasifika women if it is intended for their use. Further, it is important that midwives take the time to listen to Pasifika women, and those from other cultures, to understand their point of view.\",\"PeriodicalId\":137118,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"New Zealand College of Midwives Journal\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2018-12-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"2\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"New Zealand College of Midwives Journal\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.12784/nzcomjnl54.2018.2.15-21\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"New Zealand College of Midwives Journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.12784/nzcomjnl54.2018.2.15-21","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

摘要

通讯作者:jmcaraco@ aut.ac.nz B奥克兰理工大学,奥克兰C助产士,奥克兰背景:对于生活在新西兰的Pasifika来说,出生是一种社会建构的体验,这种体验受到社区和产科提供者的影响。尽管有初级设施,但马努考地区的帕西菲卡妇女主要选择在三级设施分娩。目的:本研究向帕西菲卡妇女询问她们在马努考区卫生局辖区内对出生地点的选择。方法:6名健康、低风险的帕西菲卡妇女参加了这项研究,她们在马努考县卫生委员会区域分娩。所有女性都接受了单独的采访,并使用主题分析对对话进行了分析,随后进行了解释学解释。研究发现:这些女性都有一种“我们在米德尔莫尔(医院)生孩子,你就在那里生孩子”的文化。作为研究人员,他们的数据让我们感到惊讶。那些出生后被转移到初级单位的人仍然倾向于选择米德尔莫尔。我们使用“偏见”这个词是为了承认我们认为(有研究证据支持)他们更有可能在初级单位正常分娩,并且更喜欢那种经历。他们告诉我们米德尔莫尔医院离家很近;这是一个他们熟悉的地方;他们更喜欢在那里生孩子。帕西菲卡妇女对出生地选择的理解受到她们所在社区的影响,或许也受到助产士的影响。虽然他们似乎对为什么选择在初级分娩单位分娩知之甚少,但他们有一种感觉,即使他们知道这些,他们也不会改变主意。他们对米德尔莫尔医院有着坚定的信任和熟悉。他们有自己的偏见;我们有我们的。认识到这些不同的观点为对话提供了不同的空间。结论:重要的是,任何新的或重新设计的分娩单位,计划与合作,如果是为他们的使用。此外,助产士花时间倾听帕西菲卡妇女和来自其他文化的妇女,了解她们的观点也很重要。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Pasifika women's choice of birthplace
A Corresponding Author: jmcaraco@ aut.ac.nz B Auckland University of Technology, Auckland C Midwife, Auckland Background: Birth is a socially constructed experience for Pasifika living in New Zealand that is shaped by their community and maternity provider’s influences. Pasifika women in the Counties Manukau region predominantly choose to birth in a tertiary facility despite there being primary facilities available. Aim: This study asked Pasifika women about their choices for place of birth within the Counties Manukau District Health Board region. Method: Six healthy, low risk Pasifika women, who had given birth in the Counties Manukau District Health Board region, participated in this study. All women were interviewed individually and conversations were analysed using thematic analysis, followed by a hermeneutic interpretation. Findings: The women shared a culture of “we birth at Middlemore [Hospital] and that is where you have babies”. Their data surprised us as researchers. Those who had been transferred postnatally to primary units tended to still prefer Middlemore. We use the word “prejudice” in recognising that we thought (backed by research evidence) that they would be more likely to have a normal birth in a primary unit, and would prefer that experience. They told us that Middlemore Hospital was close to home; it was a place they knew; and it was where they preferred to give birth. The Pasifika women’s understanding of choice of birthplace was influenced by their community and, perhaps, by their midwife. While they seemed to have minimal understanding of why they would choose to birth at a primary birthing unit, there was a sense that even if they had this knowledge, they would not have changed their minds. They had a trust of, and familiarity with, Middlemore Hospital that held firm. They had their prejudice; we had ours. Recognising these different views offers a different space for conversation. Conclusion: It is important that any new or re-designed birthing unit be planned in collaboration with Pasifika women if it is intended for their use. Further, it is important that midwives take the time to listen to Pasifika women, and those from other cultures, to understand their point of view.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.10
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信