英国不断变化的护理网络

Laura Bear, Deborah James, Nikita Simpson, Eileen Alexander, J. Bhogal, Rebecca E. Bowers, Fenella Cannell, A. Lohiya, Insa Koch, Megan Laws, Johannes F. Lenhard, Nicholas J. Long, Alice Pearson, Farhan Samanani, Milena Wuerth, Olivia Vicol, J. Vieira, C. Watt, Catherine Whittle, Teo Zidaru-Barbulescu
{"title":"英国不断变化的护理网络","authors":"Laura Bear, Deborah James, Nikita Simpson, Eileen Alexander, J. Bhogal, Rebecca E. Bowers, Fenella Cannell, A. Lohiya, Insa Koch, Megan Laws, Johannes F. Lenhard, Nicholas J. Long, Alice Pearson, Farhan Samanani, Milena Wuerth, Olivia Vicol, J. Vieira, C. Watt, Catherine Whittle, Teo Zidaru-Barbulescu","doi":"10.1515/9783110718249-014","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"It is a truism to point out that the COVID-19 pandemic (and the United Kingdom government’s response to it) has brought major disruption to everyday life. It has also, however, exposed and intensified existing fault-lines in society. The relationship between paid and unpaid labor, and the need to better recognize and reimburse the latter, long a key concern of feminist theorists and activists especially in relation to work within the household, has been one key issue of focus in our research. As parents with children have had to add childcare and home schooling to their work portfolios, there are reports of women in both middle-class and poorer households doing the lion’s share. Meanwhile, as low-paid workers in the National Health Service (NHS), ‘care’ sector, and essential/key workers – often hailing from communities of recent or not-so-recent immigrants – have had to continue to work, other, higher-paid workers (not deemed to be ‘key’) have been able to stay safe by working at home; pre-existing inequalities between classes have been laid bare in ever-starker fashion. Pre-Covid, even after a decade of austerity, certain aspects of care for families in the lowpaid category were undertaken by a ‘mixed economy’ of welfare.2 This combined state welfare facilities, often provided at local level, with services rendered by charities staffed both by volunteers and salaried officers, while welfare payments known as ‘universal credit’ were delivered centrally by the Department of Welfare and Pensions. Now, in the time of coronavirus, these services have been thinned out, while lockdown has truncated informal sources of support in social relationships, making them difficult to draw on in times of need. This has caused anger and distress, and in some cases trauma. Whether people feel that the lockdown has been necessary or not, many of those in the low-paid sectors feel as though their situation – and suffering – is invisible to the government. Multiple forms of disadvantage emerge from this threat to the ties that bind people to each other.","PeriodicalId":426197,"journal":{"name":"Corona and Work around the Globe","volume":"1 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-12-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Changing Care Networks in the United Kingdom\",\"authors\":\"Laura Bear, Deborah James, Nikita Simpson, Eileen Alexander, J. Bhogal, Rebecca E. Bowers, Fenella Cannell, A. Lohiya, Insa Koch, Megan Laws, Johannes F. Lenhard, Nicholas J. Long, Alice Pearson, Farhan Samanani, Milena Wuerth, Olivia Vicol, J. Vieira, C. Watt, Catherine Whittle, Teo Zidaru-Barbulescu\",\"doi\":\"10.1515/9783110718249-014\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"It is a truism to point out that the COVID-19 pandemic (and the United Kingdom government’s response to it) has brought major disruption to everyday life. It has also, however, exposed and intensified existing fault-lines in society. The relationship between paid and unpaid labor, and the need to better recognize and reimburse the latter, long a key concern of feminist theorists and activists especially in relation to work within the household, has been one key issue of focus in our research. As parents with children have had to add childcare and home schooling to their work portfolios, there are reports of women in both middle-class and poorer households doing the lion’s share. Meanwhile, as low-paid workers in the National Health Service (NHS), ‘care’ sector, and essential/key workers – often hailing from communities of recent or not-so-recent immigrants – have had to continue to work, other, higher-paid workers (not deemed to be ‘key’) have been able to stay safe by working at home; pre-existing inequalities between classes have been laid bare in ever-starker fashion. Pre-Covid, even after a decade of austerity, certain aspects of care for families in the lowpaid category were undertaken by a ‘mixed economy’ of welfare.2 This combined state welfare facilities, often provided at local level, with services rendered by charities staffed both by volunteers and salaried officers, while welfare payments known as ‘universal credit’ were delivered centrally by the Department of Welfare and Pensions. Now, in the time of coronavirus, these services have been thinned out, while lockdown has truncated informal sources of support in social relationships, making them difficult to draw on in times of need. This has caused anger and distress, and in some cases trauma. Whether people feel that the lockdown has been necessary or not, many of those in the low-paid sectors feel as though their situation – and suffering – is invisible to the government. Multiple forms of disadvantage emerge from this threat to the ties that bind people to each other.\",\"PeriodicalId\":426197,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Corona and Work around the Globe\",\"volume\":\"1 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2020-12-16\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Corona and Work around the Globe\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110718249-014\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Corona and Work around the Globe","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110718249-014","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

摘要

众所周知,新冠肺炎大流行(以及英国政府的应对措施)给日常生活带来了重大干扰。然而,它也暴露并加剧了社会中现有的断层线。有偿劳动和无偿劳动之间的关系,以及更好地认识和补偿后者的必要性,长期以来一直是女权主义理论家和活动家关注的关键问题,特别是在家庭工作方面,这一直是我们研究的一个关键问题。由于有孩子的父母不得不在他们的工作组合中增加照顾孩子和在家上学的工作,有报道称,中产阶级和贫困家庭的女性都承担了大部分责任。与此同时,由于国民保健服务(NHS)的低收入工人、“护理”部门和基本/关键工人——通常来自近期或不那么近期的移民社区——不得不继续工作,其他高薪工人(不被视为“关键”工人)能够通过在家工作来保持安全;阶级间存在的不平等以前所未有的方式暴露无遗。在covid - 19之前,即使经过十年的紧缩,对低收入家庭的护理的某些方面仍由福利的“混合经济”承担这种结合了国家福利设施,通常在地方一级提供,由志愿者和受薪官员组成的慈善机构提供服务,而被称为“普遍信贷”的福利支付由福利和养老金部集中发放。现在,在冠状病毒时期,这些服务已经减少,而封锁也切断了社会关系中的非正式支持来源,使它们难以在需要的时候得到利用。这引起了愤怒和痛苦,在某些情况下还造成了创伤。无论人们是否认为封锁是必要的,许多低收入行业的人都觉得自己的处境和痛苦对政府来说是不可见的。这种对人与人之间的纽带的威胁产生了多种形式的不利影响。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Changing Care Networks in the United Kingdom
It is a truism to point out that the COVID-19 pandemic (and the United Kingdom government’s response to it) has brought major disruption to everyday life. It has also, however, exposed and intensified existing fault-lines in society. The relationship between paid and unpaid labor, and the need to better recognize and reimburse the latter, long a key concern of feminist theorists and activists especially in relation to work within the household, has been one key issue of focus in our research. As parents with children have had to add childcare and home schooling to their work portfolios, there are reports of women in both middle-class and poorer households doing the lion’s share. Meanwhile, as low-paid workers in the National Health Service (NHS), ‘care’ sector, and essential/key workers – often hailing from communities of recent or not-so-recent immigrants – have had to continue to work, other, higher-paid workers (not deemed to be ‘key’) have been able to stay safe by working at home; pre-existing inequalities between classes have been laid bare in ever-starker fashion. Pre-Covid, even after a decade of austerity, certain aspects of care for families in the lowpaid category were undertaken by a ‘mixed economy’ of welfare.2 This combined state welfare facilities, often provided at local level, with services rendered by charities staffed both by volunteers and salaried officers, while welfare payments known as ‘universal credit’ were delivered centrally by the Department of Welfare and Pensions. Now, in the time of coronavirus, these services have been thinned out, while lockdown has truncated informal sources of support in social relationships, making them difficult to draw on in times of need. This has caused anger and distress, and in some cases trauma. Whether people feel that the lockdown has been necessary or not, many of those in the low-paid sectors feel as though their situation – and suffering – is invisible to the government. Multiple forms of disadvantage emerge from this threat to the ties that bind people to each other.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信