杯子是半满还是半空?在工业中进行实证研究(特邀演讲)

I. Ozkaya
{"title":"杯子是半满还是半空?在工业中进行实证研究(特邀演讲)","authors":"I. Ozkaya","doi":"10.1145/2593690.2593698","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Building effective collaborations, scoping a research problem to produce results that will benefit the industry, and lacking access to data are often listed as barriers to conducting academic studies in industry. Despite these challenges, research that uses empirical approaches and that collaborates with industry is increasing; there are even conferences and journals dedicated to the cause. The software engineering research community aims to produce results that are valuable to practice through these endeavors. Yet, one key goal of this research seems to get lost as we try to sort through the challenges that such collaborations impose upon the work plan: Do the results of these studies really help us innovate and produce research outputs that others can use, build on, and replicate? Or are we becoming victims of the available empirical software engineering methods? In this presentation, I will give examples of how the results of empirical studies have helped shape research problems in which industry can more easily take part and even be engaged partners in the work.","PeriodicalId":200036,"journal":{"name":"Conducting Empirical Studies in Industry","volume":"4 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2014-06-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Is the glass half empty or half full? conducting empirical studies in industry (invited talk)\",\"authors\":\"I. Ozkaya\",\"doi\":\"10.1145/2593690.2593698\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Building effective collaborations, scoping a research problem to produce results that will benefit the industry, and lacking access to data are often listed as barriers to conducting academic studies in industry. Despite these challenges, research that uses empirical approaches and that collaborates with industry is increasing; there are even conferences and journals dedicated to the cause. The software engineering research community aims to produce results that are valuable to practice through these endeavors. Yet, one key goal of this research seems to get lost as we try to sort through the challenges that such collaborations impose upon the work plan: Do the results of these studies really help us innovate and produce research outputs that others can use, build on, and replicate? Or are we becoming victims of the available empirical software engineering methods? In this presentation, I will give examples of how the results of empirical studies have helped shape research problems in which industry can more easily take part and even be engaged partners in the work.\",\"PeriodicalId\":200036,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Conducting Empirical Studies in Industry\",\"volume\":\"4 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2014-06-02\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Conducting Empirical Studies in Industry\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1145/2593690.2593698\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Conducting Empirical Studies in Industry","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1145/2593690.2593698","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

建立有效的合作、确定研究问题的范围以产生有利于行业的结果以及缺乏获取数据的途径通常被列为在行业中进行学术研究的障碍。尽管存在这些挑战,但使用实证方法并与行业合作的研究正在增加;甚至还有专门的会议和期刊。软件工程研究社区的目标是通过这些努力产生对实践有价值的结果。然而,当我们试图理清这种合作给工作计划带来的挑战时,这项研究的一个关键目标似乎被遗忘了:这些研究的结果真的能帮助我们创新并产生其他人可以使用、建立和复制的研究成果吗?或者我们正在成为可用的经验软件工程方法的受害者?在这次演讲中,我将举例说明实证研究的结果如何帮助形成研究问题,在这些问题中,工业界可以更容易地参与,甚至成为工作的合作伙伴。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Is the glass half empty or half full? conducting empirical studies in industry (invited talk)
Building effective collaborations, scoping a research problem to produce results that will benefit the industry, and lacking access to data are often listed as barriers to conducting academic studies in industry. Despite these challenges, research that uses empirical approaches and that collaborates with industry is increasing; there are even conferences and journals dedicated to the cause. The software engineering research community aims to produce results that are valuable to practice through these endeavors. Yet, one key goal of this research seems to get lost as we try to sort through the challenges that such collaborations impose upon the work plan: Do the results of these studies really help us innovate and produce research outputs that others can use, build on, and replicate? Or are we becoming victims of the available empirical software engineering methods? In this presentation, I will give examples of how the results of empirical studies have helped shape research problems in which industry can more easily take part and even be engaged partners in the work.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信