{"title":"灌水程序对两种不同粘接技术粘接纤维桩粘结强度的影响","authors":"S. Apostolska, M. Andonovska, V. Rendžova","doi":"10.2298/sgs2302063a","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Introduction. Endodontically treated teeth are usually weaker due to the loss\n of tooth structure. As most of the crown of the tooth is destroyed, the most\n common retention for restoration is application of a fiber-reinforced\n composite posts in the root canal. In endodontically treated teeth, there\n are two main problems in the restorative procedure: reduced resistance of\n the remaining tooth structure and choosing the necessary adequate retention\n for restoration. The aim of this work was to evaluate the impact of\n irrigation protocol on the bond strength of two types of fiber posts luted\n with two different adhesive cements. Materials and method. In this in vitro\n study, 48 single-rooted teeth (incisors, single-rooted second premolars)\n extracted for orthodontic and periodontal reasons were used. The teeth were\n divided into the four groups of 12 teeth depending on the type of fiber post\n used as well as the irrigation agent. Each group was further divided into\n the two subgroups of six teeth depending on the material and cementation\n technique. Results. In all cross-sectional statistics the difference\n appeared only when different types of irrigants were used and they changed\n bond strength between dentin and bonding material. Conclusions. Irrigation\n protocol has a significant influence on the bond strength of composite post,\n independent of the type of post and cementation material used.","PeriodicalId":180624,"journal":{"name":"Serbian Dental Journal","volume":"19 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1900-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The impact of irrigation procedures on the bond strength of fiber posts cemented with two different adhesive techniques\",\"authors\":\"S. Apostolska, M. Andonovska, V. Rendžova\",\"doi\":\"10.2298/sgs2302063a\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Introduction. Endodontically treated teeth are usually weaker due to the loss\\n of tooth structure. As most of the crown of the tooth is destroyed, the most\\n common retention for restoration is application of a fiber-reinforced\\n composite posts in the root canal. In endodontically treated teeth, there\\n are two main problems in the restorative procedure: reduced resistance of\\n the remaining tooth structure and choosing the necessary adequate retention\\n for restoration. The aim of this work was to evaluate the impact of\\n irrigation protocol on the bond strength of two types of fiber posts luted\\n with two different adhesive cements. Materials and method. In this in vitro\\n study, 48 single-rooted teeth (incisors, single-rooted second premolars)\\n extracted for orthodontic and periodontal reasons were used. The teeth were\\n divided into the four groups of 12 teeth depending on the type of fiber post\\n used as well as the irrigation agent. Each group was further divided into\\n the two subgroups of six teeth depending on the material and cementation\\n technique. Results. In all cross-sectional statistics the difference\\n appeared only when different types of irrigants were used and they changed\\n bond strength between dentin and bonding material. Conclusions. Irrigation\\n protocol has a significant influence on the bond strength of composite post,\\n independent of the type of post and cementation material used.\",\"PeriodicalId\":180624,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Serbian Dental Journal\",\"volume\":\"19 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"1900-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Serbian Dental Journal\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.2298/sgs2302063a\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Serbian Dental Journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2298/sgs2302063a","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
The impact of irrigation procedures on the bond strength of fiber posts cemented with two different adhesive techniques
Introduction. Endodontically treated teeth are usually weaker due to the loss
of tooth structure. As most of the crown of the tooth is destroyed, the most
common retention for restoration is application of a fiber-reinforced
composite posts in the root canal. In endodontically treated teeth, there
are two main problems in the restorative procedure: reduced resistance of
the remaining tooth structure and choosing the necessary adequate retention
for restoration. The aim of this work was to evaluate the impact of
irrigation protocol on the bond strength of two types of fiber posts luted
with two different adhesive cements. Materials and method. In this in vitro
study, 48 single-rooted teeth (incisors, single-rooted second premolars)
extracted for orthodontic and periodontal reasons were used. The teeth were
divided into the four groups of 12 teeth depending on the type of fiber post
used as well as the irrigation agent. Each group was further divided into
the two subgroups of six teeth depending on the material and cementation
technique. Results. In all cross-sectional statistics the difference
appeared only when different types of irrigants were used and they changed
bond strength between dentin and bonding material. Conclusions. Irrigation
protocol has a significant influence on the bond strength of composite post,
independent of the type of post and cementation material used.