WebSocket的采用和实时网络的前景

Paul Murley, Zane Ma, Joshua Mason, Michael Bailey, Amin Kharraz
{"title":"WebSocket的采用和实时网络的前景","authors":"Paul Murley, Zane Ma, Joshua Mason, Michael Bailey, Amin Kharraz","doi":"10.1145/3442381.3450063","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Developers are increasingly deploying web applications which require real-time bidirectional updates, a use case which does not naturally align with the traditional client-server architecture of the web. Many solutions have arisen to address this need over the preceding decades, including HTTP polling, Server-Sent Events, and WebSockets. This paper investigates this ecosystem and reports on the prevalence, benefits, and drawbacks of these technologies, with a particular focus on the adoption of WebSockets. We crawl the Tranco Top 1 Million websites to build a dataset for studying real-time updates in the wild. We find that HTTP Polling remains significantly more common than WebSockets, and WebSocket adoption appears to have stagnated in the past two to three years. We investigate some of the possible reasons for this decrease in the rate of adoption, and we contrast the adoption process to that of other web technologies. Our findings further suggest that even when WebSockets are employed, the prescribed best practices for securing them are often disregarded. The dataset is made available in the hopes that it may help inform the development of future real-time solutions for the web.","PeriodicalId":106672,"journal":{"name":"Proceedings of the Web Conference 2021","volume":"4 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-04-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"5","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"WebSocket Adoption and the Landscape of the Real-Time Web\",\"authors\":\"Paul Murley, Zane Ma, Joshua Mason, Michael Bailey, Amin Kharraz\",\"doi\":\"10.1145/3442381.3450063\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Developers are increasingly deploying web applications which require real-time bidirectional updates, a use case which does not naturally align with the traditional client-server architecture of the web. Many solutions have arisen to address this need over the preceding decades, including HTTP polling, Server-Sent Events, and WebSockets. This paper investigates this ecosystem and reports on the prevalence, benefits, and drawbacks of these technologies, with a particular focus on the adoption of WebSockets. We crawl the Tranco Top 1 Million websites to build a dataset for studying real-time updates in the wild. We find that HTTP Polling remains significantly more common than WebSockets, and WebSocket adoption appears to have stagnated in the past two to three years. We investigate some of the possible reasons for this decrease in the rate of adoption, and we contrast the adoption process to that of other web technologies. Our findings further suggest that even when WebSockets are employed, the prescribed best practices for securing them are often disregarded. The dataset is made available in the hopes that it may help inform the development of future real-time solutions for the web.\",\"PeriodicalId\":106672,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Proceedings of the Web Conference 2021\",\"volume\":\"4 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-04-19\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"5\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Proceedings of the Web Conference 2021\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1145/3442381.3450063\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Proceedings of the Web Conference 2021","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1145/3442381.3450063","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 5

摘要

开发人员越来越多地部署需要实时双向更新的web应用程序,这种用例与传统的web客户端-服务器架构并不自然一致。在过去的几十年里,出现了许多解决方案来满足这一需求,包括HTTP轮询、服务器发送事件和WebSockets。本文调查了这个生态系统,并报告了这些技术的流行、优点和缺点,特别关注了WebSockets的采用。我们抓取了Tranco排名前100万的网站,建立了一个数据集,用于研究野外的实时更新。我们发现HTTP轮询仍然比WebSocket更普遍,WebSocket的采用在过去的两到三年中似乎停滞不前。我们调查了这种采用率下降的一些可能原因,并将其采用过程与其他web技术进行了对比。我们的研究结果进一步表明,即使使用了WebSockets,规定的保护它们的最佳实践也经常被忽视。提供这个数据集的目的是希望它可以为未来网络实时解决方案的开发提供信息。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
WebSocket Adoption and the Landscape of the Real-Time Web
Developers are increasingly deploying web applications which require real-time bidirectional updates, a use case which does not naturally align with the traditional client-server architecture of the web. Many solutions have arisen to address this need over the preceding decades, including HTTP polling, Server-Sent Events, and WebSockets. This paper investigates this ecosystem and reports on the prevalence, benefits, and drawbacks of these technologies, with a particular focus on the adoption of WebSockets. We crawl the Tranco Top 1 Million websites to build a dataset for studying real-time updates in the wild. We find that HTTP Polling remains significantly more common than WebSockets, and WebSocket adoption appears to have stagnated in the past two to three years. We investigate some of the possible reasons for this decrease in the rate of adoption, and we contrast the adoption process to that of other web technologies. Our findings further suggest that even when WebSockets are employed, the prescribed best practices for securing them are often disregarded. The dataset is made available in the hopes that it may help inform the development of future real-time solutions for the web.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信