世纪末的法律与文学

Gary Minda
{"title":"世纪末的法律与文学","authors":"Gary Minda","doi":"10.1080/1535685X.1997.11015807","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Have you noticed how intellectually diverse Law and Literature has become in recent years?' At one time Law and Literature in American legal studies was a marginal subject taught at only a few law schools. These Law and Literature courses, following the lead of Dean Wigmore, explored the way law was implicated in the stories told in the great literary classics of Dickens, Kafka, and Melville. The law-in-literature perspective of these courses attempted to show how the stories in the classics of Western literature might offer lawyers and judges important lessons about the nature of law lessons which are missing in the official reported stories of the cases. This understanding of Law and Literature the \"law-in-literature\" perspective was a dominant understanding shaping the American Law and literature movement in its early stages of development. But much has changed since the first law-in-literature courses popped up in the legal curriculum. Beginning in the late 1970s and throughout the 1980s, a diverse new breed of Law and Literature scholarship appeared on the legal scene which has altered the landscape of the movement. Law and Literature practitioners in America were no longer just reading and studying the Great classics of Western literature; they were reading and studying law as if it were a special \"genre\" of literature to be interpreted like any story. As it turned out, Dickens, Kafka and Melville were being edged-out by authors like Derrida, Foucault, Heidegger and Wittgenstein as Law and Literature scholars explored the meaning of law's language as a cultural and literary artifact. If law were to be regarded as a unique genre of literature, then new critical techniques and methods of translation would be needed for focusing the critical eye of Law and Literature scholars on the meaning of legal texts, languages, and institutional practices. It should not be surprising then that Law and Literature scholars began looking beyond the Great books of Western literature to the critical texts of literary theory, structuralism, post-structuralism, deconstuctionism and the like to aid them in their literary translations of legal texts.","PeriodicalId":312913,"journal":{"name":"Cardozo Studies in Law and Literature","volume":"9 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1997-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"5","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Law and Literature at Century’s End\",\"authors\":\"Gary Minda\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/1535685X.1997.11015807\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Have you noticed how intellectually diverse Law and Literature has become in recent years?' At one time Law and Literature in American legal studies was a marginal subject taught at only a few law schools. These Law and Literature courses, following the lead of Dean Wigmore, explored the way law was implicated in the stories told in the great literary classics of Dickens, Kafka, and Melville. The law-in-literature perspective of these courses attempted to show how the stories in the classics of Western literature might offer lawyers and judges important lessons about the nature of law lessons which are missing in the official reported stories of the cases. This understanding of Law and Literature the \\\"law-in-literature\\\" perspective was a dominant understanding shaping the American Law and literature movement in its early stages of development. But much has changed since the first law-in-literature courses popped up in the legal curriculum. Beginning in the late 1970s and throughout the 1980s, a diverse new breed of Law and Literature scholarship appeared on the legal scene which has altered the landscape of the movement. Law and Literature practitioners in America were no longer just reading and studying the Great classics of Western literature; they were reading and studying law as if it were a special \\\"genre\\\" of literature to be interpreted like any story. As it turned out, Dickens, Kafka and Melville were being edged-out by authors like Derrida, Foucault, Heidegger and Wittgenstein as Law and Literature scholars explored the meaning of law's language as a cultural and literary artifact. If law were to be regarded as a unique genre of literature, then new critical techniques and methods of translation would be needed for focusing the critical eye of Law and Literature scholars on the meaning of legal texts, languages, and institutional practices. It should not be surprising then that Law and Literature scholars began looking beyond the Great books of Western literature to the critical texts of literary theory, structuralism, post-structuralism, deconstuctionism and the like to aid them in their literary translations of legal texts.\",\"PeriodicalId\":312913,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Cardozo Studies in Law and Literature\",\"volume\":\"9 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"1997-10-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"5\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Cardozo Studies in Law and Literature\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/1535685X.1997.11015807\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Cardozo Studies in Law and Literature","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/1535685X.1997.11015807","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 5

摘要

你有没有注意到近年来法律和文学在知识上变得多么多样化?”曾经有一段时间,美国法律研究中的法律与文学是一门边缘学科,只有少数法学院开设。这些法律和文学课程,在Dean Wigmore的带领下,探索了法律在狄更斯、卡夫卡和梅尔维尔等伟大文学经典中所讲述的故事中所隐含的方式。这些课程的法律文学视角试图展示西方文学经典中的故事如何为律师和法官提供关于法律课程性质的重要课程,而这些课程在官方报道的案件故事中是缺失的。这种对法律和文学的理解,即“文学中的法律”的观点,在美国法律和文学运动发展的早期阶段是一种主导的理解。但是,自从第一批法律文学课程出现在法律课程中以来,情况发生了很大变化。从20世纪70年代末到整个80年代,法律界出现了一种多样化的新一代法律和文学学者,改变了这一运动的格局。美国的法律和文学从业者不再只是阅读和研究西方文学的伟大经典;他们阅读和学习法律,就好像它是一种特殊的文学“体裁”,可以像任何故事一样被解读。事实证明,狄更斯、卡夫卡和梅尔维尔正在被德里达、福柯、海德格尔和维特根斯坦等作家所取代,因为法律和文学学者们正在探索法律语言作为一种文化和文学产物的意义。如果法律被视为一种独特的文学类型,那么就需要新的批评技巧和翻译方法来将法律和文学学者的批评目光集中在法律文本,语言和制度实践的意义上。因此,法律和文学学者开始将目光从西方文学名著转向文学理论、结构主义、后结构主义、解构主义等批评文本,以帮助他们对法律文本进行文学翻译,这就不足为奇了。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Law and Literature at Century’s End
Have you noticed how intellectually diverse Law and Literature has become in recent years?' At one time Law and Literature in American legal studies was a marginal subject taught at only a few law schools. These Law and Literature courses, following the lead of Dean Wigmore, explored the way law was implicated in the stories told in the great literary classics of Dickens, Kafka, and Melville. The law-in-literature perspective of these courses attempted to show how the stories in the classics of Western literature might offer lawyers and judges important lessons about the nature of law lessons which are missing in the official reported stories of the cases. This understanding of Law and Literature the "law-in-literature" perspective was a dominant understanding shaping the American Law and literature movement in its early stages of development. But much has changed since the first law-in-literature courses popped up in the legal curriculum. Beginning in the late 1970s and throughout the 1980s, a diverse new breed of Law and Literature scholarship appeared on the legal scene which has altered the landscape of the movement. Law and Literature practitioners in America were no longer just reading and studying the Great classics of Western literature; they were reading and studying law as if it were a special "genre" of literature to be interpreted like any story. As it turned out, Dickens, Kafka and Melville were being edged-out by authors like Derrida, Foucault, Heidegger and Wittgenstein as Law and Literature scholars explored the meaning of law's language as a cultural and literary artifact. If law were to be regarded as a unique genre of literature, then new critical techniques and methods of translation would be needed for focusing the critical eye of Law and Literature scholars on the meaning of legal texts, languages, and institutional practices. It should not be surprising then that Law and Literature scholars began looking beyond the Great books of Western literature to the critical texts of literary theory, structuralism, post-structuralism, deconstuctionism and the like to aid them in their literary translations of legal texts.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信