欧盟喜欢的碳信用:财产、豁免、悲剧、补偿?

K. F. Low, Jolene Lin
{"title":"欧盟喜欢的碳信用:财产、豁免、悲剧、补偿?","authors":"K. F. Low, Jolene Lin","doi":"10.1093/JEL/EQV020","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"While there have been many legal studies of the European Union Emissions Trading Scheme, few have considered the effectiveness of the EU ETS as a matter of private law design. The authors propose to do so by tracing the history of the scheme, studying the English decision of Armstrong DLW GmbH v Winnington Networks Ltd [2012] EWHC 10 (Ch), [2013] Ch 156, as well as analysing the new EU Registry Regulations promulgated since then. We conclude that the EU ETS is handicapped by conceptual failings and exposes participants to unnecessary uncertainty that national courts will find difficult to resolve.","PeriodicalId":142986,"journal":{"name":"Law & Society: Private Law eJournal","volume":"1 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2015-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"6","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Carbon Credits As EU Like It: Property, Immunity, TragiCO2medy?\",\"authors\":\"K. F. Low, Jolene Lin\",\"doi\":\"10.1093/JEL/EQV020\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"While there have been many legal studies of the European Union Emissions Trading Scheme, few have considered the effectiveness of the EU ETS as a matter of private law design. The authors propose to do so by tracing the history of the scheme, studying the English decision of Armstrong DLW GmbH v Winnington Networks Ltd [2012] EWHC 10 (Ch), [2013] Ch 156, as well as analysing the new EU Registry Regulations promulgated since then. We conclude that the EU ETS is handicapped by conceptual failings and exposes participants to unnecessary uncertainty that national courts will find difficult to resolve.\",\"PeriodicalId\":142986,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Law & Society: Private Law eJournal\",\"volume\":\"1 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2015-02-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"6\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Law & Society: Private Law eJournal\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1093/JEL/EQV020\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Law & Society: Private Law eJournal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/JEL/EQV020","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 6

摘要

虽然有许多关于欧盟排放交易计划的法律研究,但很少有人将欧盟排放交易计划的有效性视为私法设计问题。作者建议通过追溯该计划的历史,研究Armstrong DLW GmbH诉Winnington Networks Ltd [2012] EWHC 10 (Ch), [2013] ch156的英国判决,以及分析自那时以来颁布的新的欧盟注册条例来实现这一目标。我们的结论是,欧盟排放交易体系存在概念上的缺陷,并使参与者面临不必要的不确定性,而国家法院将难以解决这些不确定性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Carbon Credits As EU Like It: Property, Immunity, TragiCO2medy?
While there have been many legal studies of the European Union Emissions Trading Scheme, few have considered the effectiveness of the EU ETS as a matter of private law design. The authors propose to do so by tracing the history of the scheme, studying the English decision of Armstrong DLW GmbH v Winnington Networks Ltd [2012] EWHC 10 (Ch), [2013] Ch 156, as well as analysing the new EU Registry Regulations promulgated since then. We conclude that the EU ETS is handicapped by conceptual failings and exposes participants to unnecessary uncertainty that national courts will find difficult to resolve.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信