面向对象COBOL的状态(面板)

J. V. Van Stee, Megan Adams, Dmitry Lenkov, Raymond Obin, Henry Saade
{"title":"面向对象COBOL的状态(面板)","authors":"J. V. Van Stee, Megan Adams, Dmitry Lenkov, Raymond Obin, Henry Saade","doi":"10.1145/260303.260318","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Joel Van Stee started the discussion with an introduction of the panel members and a brief history of the task group generating the extensions. The original sponsor of the group was CODASYL, the ANSI COBOL committee’s design group. When CODASYL was absorbed by the ANSI COBOL committee, X3J4, the object-oriented committee was separately organized as a subcommittee of X3J4, and is now known as X3J4.1. It exists only as long as the parent ANSI COBOL committee considers this independent effort required. The aim of the two groups is to have a single COBOL standard targeted for publication in 1997. implementer approved techniques. The initial design decisions included assuring that the large base of code would not be invalidated by the object-oriented extensions.","PeriodicalId":297156,"journal":{"name":"Addendum to the proceedings on Object-oriented programming systems, languages, and applications","volume":"1 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1993-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Status of object-oriented COBOL (panel)\",\"authors\":\"J. V. Van Stee, Megan Adams, Dmitry Lenkov, Raymond Obin, Henry Saade\",\"doi\":\"10.1145/260303.260318\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Joel Van Stee started the discussion with an introduction of the panel members and a brief history of the task group generating the extensions. The original sponsor of the group was CODASYL, the ANSI COBOL committee’s design group. When CODASYL was absorbed by the ANSI COBOL committee, X3J4, the object-oriented committee was separately organized as a subcommittee of X3J4, and is now known as X3J4.1. It exists only as long as the parent ANSI COBOL committee considers this independent effort required. The aim of the two groups is to have a single COBOL standard targeted for publication in 1997. implementer approved techniques. The initial design decisions included assuring that the large base of code would not be invalidated by the object-oriented extensions.\",\"PeriodicalId\":297156,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Addendum to the proceedings on Object-oriented programming systems, languages, and applications\",\"volume\":\"1 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"1993-04-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Addendum to the proceedings on Object-oriented programming systems, languages, and applications\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1145/260303.260318\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Addendum to the proceedings on Object-oriented programming systems, languages, and applications","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1145/260303.260318","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

Joel Van Stee首先介绍了小组成员,并简要介绍了生成扩展的任务组的历史。该小组的最初发起人是CODASYL,即ANSI COBOL委员会的设计组。当CODASYL被ANSI COBOL委员会X3J4吸收时,面向对象委员会被单独组织为X3J4的一个小组委员会,现在称为X3J4.1。只有当父ANSI COBOL委员会认为这种独立的努力是必需的,它才存在。这两个小组的目标是在1997年发布一个单一的COBOL标准。实现者认可的技术。最初的设计决策包括确保大型代码库不会被面向对象的扩展失效。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Status of object-oriented COBOL (panel)
Joel Van Stee started the discussion with an introduction of the panel members and a brief history of the task group generating the extensions. The original sponsor of the group was CODASYL, the ANSI COBOL committee’s design group. When CODASYL was absorbed by the ANSI COBOL committee, X3J4, the object-oriented committee was separately organized as a subcommittee of X3J4, and is now known as X3J4.1. It exists only as long as the parent ANSI COBOL committee considers this independent effort required. The aim of the two groups is to have a single COBOL standard targeted for publication in 1997. implementer approved techniques. The initial design decisions included assuring that the large base of code would not be invalidated by the object-oriented extensions.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信