为不断发展的网络-物理社会系统设计隐私风险框架:自动驾驶汽车和旁观者隐私案例所揭示的知识差距

V. Rao, Ankita Joshi, Soo Min Kang, Susan Lin, (Erin) Junghyun Song, Drew Miller, K. Goucher-Lambert, A. Agogino
{"title":"为不断发展的网络-物理社会系统设计隐私风险框架:自动驾驶汽车和旁观者隐私案例所揭示的知识差距","authors":"V. Rao, Ankita Joshi, Soo Min Kang, Susan Lin, (Erin) Junghyun Song, Drew Miller, K. Goucher-Lambert, A. Agogino","doi":"10.1115/detc2022-90958","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\n Designers and engineers increasingly engage with and must design for sociotechnical systems, also described as cyber-physical-social systems (CPSS). Leading frameworks like System-Theoretic Process Analysis and Value-Sensitive Design intend to help designers consider the consequences and impacts of their work with CPSS. However, such frameworks may not sufficiently account for human-centered scenarios. This complicates designers’ efforts to balance user needs with traditional forms of risk assessment. In this work, we explore foundations for the design of human-centered risk frameworks and examine a case study of autonomous vehicles and bystanders’ privacy as an example CPSS to address this gap. We develop an exploratory scenario-based risk framework and conduct expert interviews with experienced professionals (N = 7) working in the fields of autonomous vehicle design, development, policy and security to understand their perspectives on risk assessment and gather feedback on our framework. Reconciling interview findings with existing knowledge of evolving CPSS, we identify three broad knowledge gaps that could motivate future research in this space. First, we argue that there is a knowledge gap in developing human-centered frameworks and best practices to consider all stakeholders during the design of evolving CPSS. Second, we argue that a knowledge gap exists in acknowledging, reconciling, and proactively managing disciplinary discontinuities in vocabularies and mental models in evolving CPSS. Lastly, we argue that a critical knowledge gap exists around how to adapt scenario-based frameworks to accommodate the shifting challenges of designing evolving CPSS. We conclude with a discussion of preliminary implications for designing human-centered frameworks for autonomous vehicles and CPSS more generally.","PeriodicalId":394503,"journal":{"name":"Volume 3B: 48th Design Automation Conference (DAC)","volume":"1 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-08-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Designing Privacy Risk Frameworks for Evolving Cyber-Physical Social Systems: Knowledge Gaps Illuminated by the Case of Autonomous Vehicles and Bystander Privacy\",\"authors\":\"V. Rao, Ankita Joshi, Soo Min Kang, Susan Lin, (Erin) Junghyun Song, Drew Miller, K. Goucher-Lambert, A. Agogino\",\"doi\":\"10.1115/detc2022-90958\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"\\n Designers and engineers increasingly engage with and must design for sociotechnical systems, also described as cyber-physical-social systems (CPSS). Leading frameworks like System-Theoretic Process Analysis and Value-Sensitive Design intend to help designers consider the consequences and impacts of their work with CPSS. However, such frameworks may not sufficiently account for human-centered scenarios. This complicates designers’ efforts to balance user needs with traditional forms of risk assessment. In this work, we explore foundations for the design of human-centered risk frameworks and examine a case study of autonomous vehicles and bystanders’ privacy as an example CPSS to address this gap. We develop an exploratory scenario-based risk framework and conduct expert interviews with experienced professionals (N = 7) working in the fields of autonomous vehicle design, development, policy and security to understand their perspectives on risk assessment and gather feedback on our framework. Reconciling interview findings with existing knowledge of evolving CPSS, we identify three broad knowledge gaps that could motivate future research in this space. First, we argue that there is a knowledge gap in developing human-centered frameworks and best practices to consider all stakeholders during the design of evolving CPSS. Second, we argue that a knowledge gap exists in acknowledging, reconciling, and proactively managing disciplinary discontinuities in vocabularies and mental models in evolving CPSS. Lastly, we argue that a critical knowledge gap exists around how to adapt scenario-based frameworks to accommodate the shifting challenges of designing evolving CPSS. We conclude with a discussion of preliminary implications for designing human-centered frameworks for autonomous vehicles and CPSS more generally.\",\"PeriodicalId\":394503,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Volume 3B: 48th Design Automation Conference (DAC)\",\"volume\":\"1 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-08-14\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Volume 3B: 48th Design Automation Conference (DAC)\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1115/detc2022-90958\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Volume 3B: 48th Design Automation Conference (DAC)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1115/detc2022-90958","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

设计师和工程师越来越多地参与并必须为社会技术系统设计,也被称为网络物理社会系统(CPSS)。领先的框架,如系统理论过程分析和价值敏感设计,旨在帮助设计师考虑他们使用CPSS工作的后果和影响。然而,这样的框架可能不能充分解释以人为中心的场景。这使得设计师在平衡用户需求与传统形式的风险评估之间的努力变得复杂。在这项工作中,我们探索了以人为中心的风险框架设计的基础,并研究了自动驾驶汽车和旁观者隐私的案例研究,作为CPSS的例子来解决这一差距。我们开发了一个探索性的基于场景的风险框架,并与在自动驾驶汽车设计、开发、政策和安全领域工作的经验丰富的专业人士(N = 7)进行了专家访谈,以了解他们对风险评估的看法,并收集对我们框架的反馈。将访谈结果与不断发展的CPSS的现有知识相协调,我们确定了三个广泛的知识差距,可以激励这一领域的未来研究。首先,我们认为在不断发展的CPSS设计过程中,在开发以人为中心的框架和考虑所有利益相关者的最佳实践方面存在知识差距。其次,我们认为在认知、协调和主动管理CPSS发展过程中词汇和心智模型的学科不连续性方面存在知识缺口。最后,我们认为,在如何适应基于场景的框架以适应设计不断变化的CPSS挑战方面,存在一个关键的知识缺口。最后,我们讨论了为自动驾驶汽车和CPSS设计以人为中心的框架的初步影响。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Designing Privacy Risk Frameworks for Evolving Cyber-Physical Social Systems: Knowledge Gaps Illuminated by the Case of Autonomous Vehicles and Bystander Privacy
Designers and engineers increasingly engage with and must design for sociotechnical systems, also described as cyber-physical-social systems (CPSS). Leading frameworks like System-Theoretic Process Analysis and Value-Sensitive Design intend to help designers consider the consequences and impacts of their work with CPSS. However, such frameworks may not sufficiently account for human-centered scenarios. This complicates designers’ efforts to balance user needs with traditional forms of risk assessment. In this work, we explore foundations for the design of human-centered risk frameworks and examine a case study of autonomous vehicles and bystanders’ privacy as an example CPSS to address this gap. We develop an exploratory scenario-based risk framework and conduct expert interviews with experienced professionals (N = 7) working in the fields of autonomous vehicle design, development, policy and security to understand their perspectives on risk assessment and gather feedback on our framework. Reconciling interview findings with existing knowledge of evolving CPSS, we identify three broad knowledge gaps that could motivate future research in this space. First, we argue that there is a knowledge gap in developing human-centered frameworks and best practices to consider all stakeholders during the design of evolving CPSS. Second, we argue that a knowledge gap exists in acknowledging, reconciling, and proactively managing disciplinary discontinuities in vocabularies and mental models in evolving CPSS. Lastly, we argue that a critical knowledge gap exists around how to adapt scenario-based frameworks to accommodate the shifting challenges of designing evolving CPSS. We conclude with a discussion of preliminary implications for designing human-centered frameworks for autonomous vehicles and CPSS more generally.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信