两种结直肠吻合器加压失败的比较

Youssef Fahmy, M. Trabia, Brian Ward, L. Gallup, Whitney Elks
{"title":"两种结直肠吻合器加压失败的比较","authors":"Youssef Fahmy, M. Trabia, Brian Ward, L. Gallup, Whitney Elks","doi":"10.1115/dmd2023-8985","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\n Anastomotic leakage (AL) is a serious complication that effects thousands of patients undergoing colorectal surgery annually. Stapling is generally used to perform anastomoses. Two common anastomosis techniques are the End to End (EE), and End to Side (ES). Currently there is no experimental approach to compare the effectiveness of these two techniques against AL. This work proposes an ex-vivo experimental setup of burst testing of anastomoses using porcine tissues. Twelve pigs were used with three specimens harvested from the colon of each of them: EE, ES, and a control specimen. Failure of the anastomoses were monitored, and the corresponding leakage pressures were recorded. Preliminary results indicated that ES led to higher strength than EE.","PeriodicalId":325836,"journal":{"name":"2023 Design of Medical Devices Conference","volume":"5 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-04-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"A COMPARISON OF THE PRESSURE FAILURE OF TWO COLORECTAL ANASTAMOSES STAPLING TECHNIQUES\",\"authors\":\"Youssef Fahmy, M. Trabia, Brian Ward, L. Gallup, Whitney Elks\",\"doi\":\"10.1115/dmd2023-8985\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"\\n Anastomotic leakage (AL) is a serious complication that effects thousands of patients undergoing colorectal surgery annually. Stapling is generally used to perform anastomoses. Two common anastomosis techniques are the End to End (EE), and End to Side (ES). Currently there is no experimental approach to compare the effectiveness of these two techniques against AL. This work proposes an ex-vivo experimental setup of burst testing of anastomoses using porcine tissues. Twelve pigs were used with three specimens harvested from the colon of each of them: EE, ES, and a control specimen. Failure of the anastomoses were monitored, and the corresponding leakage pressures were recorded. Preliminary results indicated that ES led to higher strength than EE.\",\"PeriodicalId\":325836,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"2023 Design of Medical Devices Conference\",\"volume\":\"5 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-04-17\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"2023 Design of Medical Devices Conference\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1115/dmd2023-8985\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2023 Design of Medical Devices Conference","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1115/dmd2023-8985","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

吻合口瘘(AL)是每年影响成千上万结直肠手术患者的严重并发症。吻合器通常用于吻合术。两种常见的吻合技术是端到端(EE)和端到侧(ES)。目前还没有实验方法来比较这两种技术对AL的有效性。本研究提出了一种利用猪组织进行吻合口爆裂测试的离体实验装置。使用12头猪,每头猪结肠取3个标本:EE、ES和一个对照标本。监测吻合口失效情况,记录相应的泄漏压力。初步结果表明,ES的强度高于EE。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
A COMPARISON OF THE PRESSURE FAILURE OF TWO COLORECTAL ANASTAMOSES STAPLING TECHNIQUES
Anastomotic leakage (AL) is a serious complication that effects thousands of patients undergoing colorectal surgery annually. Stapling is generally used to perform anastomoses. Two common anastomosis techniques are the End to End (EE), and End to Side (ES). Currently there is no experimental approach to compare the effectiveness of these two techniques against AL. This work proposes an ex-vivo experimental setup of burst testing of anastomoses using porcine tissues. Twelve pigs were used with three specimens harvested from the colon of each of them: EE, ES, and a control specimen. Failure of the anastomoses were monitored, and the corresponding leakage pressures were recorded. Preliminary results indicated that ES led to higher strength than EE.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信