这个联合国组织是败诉了吗?虔诚关系的脆弱和攻击性关系的坚不可摧

R. Starkermann
{"title":"这个联合国组织是败诉了吗?虔诚关系的脆弱和攻击性关系的坚不可摧","authors":"R. Starkermann","doi":"10.1109/KTSC.1995.569153","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The United Nations charter was signed by 51 nations in San Francisco on June 26, 1945. Its intention is to maintain world peace and to promote cooperation among nations. It consists of 159 countries all around the globe. The preceding organisation, the League of Nations (1919), which pursued the same goal, failed drastically due to unability to prevent the 2nd World War. If the main purpose of the UN is to maintain peace on Earth, then it has also already failed-and also as drastically as the League of Nations. This paper demonstrates in social-mathematical quantified terms that it is an irrefutable natural law that aggressive relationships will dominate over peaceful behaviour and that aggression has the following advantages over devotion. Aggression (a) provides more will-power in action, (b) acts faster, (c) has a much wider range of stable existence than devotion, and (d) is practically invulnerable to external influences compared to the utmost vulnerable devotion.","PeriodicalId":283614,"journal":{"name":"Proceedings 1995 Interdisciplinary Conference: Knowledge Tools for a Sustainable Civilization. Fourth Canadian Conference on Foundations and Applications of General Science Theory","volume":"8 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1995-06-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Is the UN-organisation a lost case? The vulnerability of devotional and the invulnerability of aggressive relationships\",\"authors\":\"R. Starkermann\",\"doi\":\"10.1109/KTSC.1995.569153\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The United Nations charter was signed by 51 nations in San Francisco on June 26, 1945. Its intention is to maintain world peace and to promote cooperation among nations. It consists of 159 countries all around the globe. The preceding organisation, the League of Nations (1919), which pursued the same goal, failed drastically due to unability to prevent the 2nd World War. If the main purpose of the UN is to maintain peace on Earth, then it has also already failed-and also as drastically as the League of Nations. This paper demonstrates in social-mathematical quantified terms that it is an irrefutable natural law that aggressive relationships will dominate over peaceful behaviour and that aggression has the following advantages over devotion. Aggression (a) provides more will-power in action, (b) acts faster, (c) has a much wider range of stable existence than devotion, and (d) is practically invulnerable to external influences compared to the utmost vulnerable devotion.\",\"PeriodicalId\":283614,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Proceedings 1995 Interdisciplinary Conference: Knowledge Tools for a Sustainable Civilization. Fourth Canadian Conference on Foundations and Applications of General Science Theory\",\"volume\":\"8 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"1995-06-08\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Proceedings 1995 Interdisciplinary Conference: Knowledge Tools for a Sustainable Civilization. Fourth Canadian Conference on Foundations and Applications of General Science Theory\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1109/KTSC.1995.569153\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Proceedings 1995 Interdisciplinary Conference: Knowledge Tools for a Sustainable Civilization. Fourth Canadian Conference on Foundations and Applications of General Science Theory","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/KTSC.1995.569153","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

1945年6月26日,51个国家在旧金山签署了《联合国宪章》。其目的是维护世界和平,促进国家间的合作。它由全球159个国家组成。此前的国际联盟(League of Nations, 1919)也追求同样的目标,但由于无法阻止第二次世界大战而彻底失败。如果联合国的主要目的是维持地球上的和平,那么它也已经失败了——而且和国际联盟一样彻底失败了。本文用社会数学量化的术语证明,侵略关系将支配和平行为,这是一个无可辩驳的自然规律,侵略比奉献有以下优势。侵略(a)在行动中提供更多的意志力,(b)行动更快,(c)比忠诚有更广泛的稳定存在范围,(d)与最脆弱的忠诚相比,几乎不受外部影响的伤害。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Is the UN-organisation a lost case? The vulnerability of devotional and the invulnerability of aggressive relationships
The United Nations charter was signed by 51 nations in San Francisco on June 26, 1945. Its intention is to maintain world peace and to promote cooperation among nations. It consists of 159 countries all around the globe. The preceding organisation, the League of Nations (1919), which pursued the same goal, failed drastically due to unability to prevent the 2nd World War. If the main purpose of the UN is to maintain peace on Earth, then it has also already failed-and also as drastically as the League of Nations. This paper demonstrates in social-mathematical quantified terms that it is an irrefutable natural law that aggressive relationships will dominate over peaceful behaviour and that aggression has the following advantages over devotion. Aggression (a) provides more will-power in action, (b) acts faster, (c) has a much wider range of stable existence than devotion, and (d) is practically invulnerable to external influences compared to the utmost vulnerable devotion.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信