美墨边境双语西班牙裔护理学生的语言能力和学业成就

Cristina a Dominguez De Quezada, D. Alfred, Melinda Hermanns, Danice Brown Greer, Shellye A. Vardaman, Maria Amaya
{"title":"美墨边境双语西班牙裔护理学生的语言能力和学业成就","authors":"Cristina a Dominguez De Quezada, D. Alfred, Melinda Hermanns, Danice Brown Greer, Shellye A. Vardaman, Maria Amaya","doi":"10.47988/janany.4491588158643655.2.2","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background: The Texas Department of State Health Services reported an enrollment of 29.7% Hispanic heritage students in nursing schools in 2020. Hispanics comprise of 18.5% of the total US population. Hispanic communities are less likely to speak proficient English than non-Hispanic Whites due to lack of language concordance. A diverse nursing workforce is necessary to accommodate the changing community. English as an additional language is frequently identified as a barrier to a nursing degree. This study examined how English proficiency affects nursing academic success of non-BSN and BSN nursing students. Methodology: Non-experimental descriptive quantitative research with two open-ended questions were employed. Students from 27 non-BSN and BSN programs along the U.S.-Mexico border were surveyed. Participants (N = 158) self-reported Grade Point Average (GPAs) on a 4.0 scale and completed two language proficiency instruments, the Language Experience and Proficiency Questionnaire (LEAP-Q) and the English Language Acculturation Scale (ELAS). Participants responded to questions related to strategies that were either beneficial or barriers to their learning and success. Results: Regression of GPA on predictors of English proficiency yielded non-significant models. Convergent validity between the two language proficiency instruments was supported, and reliability was similarly high. MANOVA analysis revealed students on a BSN versus non-BSN program hold higher GPAs. Non-BSN students showed higher Spanish language proficiency than those on a BSN program. Seven themes emerged from the question data, three themes showed that English as an Additional Language (EAL) benefits students (support, communication, and academic resources) and four were barriers to learning (finances, time management, language, and self-perception). Conclusion: A diverse bilingual nursing workforce is essential to meet the future needs of the US. Even though language proficiency did not predict academic success, students enrolled in non-BSN and BSN students who utilized both languages were academically successful.","PeriodicalId":192372,"journal":{"name":"Journal of the American Nurses Association - New York","volume":"1 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-08-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Language Proficiency and Academic Success of Bilingual Hispanic Nursing Students along the US-Mexico Border\",\"authors\":\"Cristina a Dominguez De Quezada, D. Alfred, Melinda Hermanns, Danice Brown Greer, Shellye A. Vardaman, Maria Amaya\",\"doi\":\"10.47988/janany.4491588158643655.2.2\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Background: The Texas Department of State Health Services reported an enrollment of 29.7% Hispanic heritage students in nursing schools in 2020. Hispanics comprise of 18.5% of the total US population. Hispanic communities are less likely to speak proficient English than non-Hispanic Whites due to lack of language concordance. A diverse nursing workforce is necessary to accommodate the changing community. English as an additional language is frequently identified as a barrier to a nursing degree. This study examined how English proficiency affects nursing academic success of non-BSN and BSN nursing students. Methodology: Non-experimental descriptive quantitative research with two open-ended questions were employed. Students from 27 non-BSN and BSN programs along the U.S.-Mexico border were surveyed. Participants (N = 158) self-reported Grade Point Average (GPAs) on a 4.0 scale and completed two language proficiency instruments, the Language Experience and Proficiency Questionnaire (LEAP-Q) and the English Language Acculturation Scale (ELAS). Participants responded to questions related to strategies that were either beneficial or barriers to their learning and success. Results: Regression of GPA on predictors of English proficiency yielded non-significant models. Convergent validity between the two language proficiency instruments was supported, and reliability was similarly high. MANOVA analysis revealed students on a BSN versus non-BSN program hold higher GPAs. Non-BSN students showed higher Spanish language proficiency than those on a BSN program. Seven themes emerged from the question data, three themes showed that English as an Additional Language (EAL) benefits students (support, communication, and academic resources) and four were barriers to learning (finances, time management, language, and self-perception). Conclusion: A diverse bilingual nursing workforce is essential to meet the future needs of the US. Even though language proficiency did not predict academic success, students enrolled in non-BSN and BSN students who utilized both languages were academically successful.\",\"PeriodicalId\":192372,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of the American Nurses Association - New York\",\"volume\":\"1 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-08-23\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of the American Nurses Association - New York\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.47988/janany.4491588158643655.2.2\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of the American Nurses Association - New York","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.47988/janany.4491588158643655.2.2","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:德克萨斯州卫生服务部报告称,2020年护理学校的西班牙裔学生入学率为29.7%。拉美裔占美国总人口的18.5%。由于缺乏语言一致性,西班牙裔社区比非西班牙裔白人更不可能说流利的英语。多样化的护理人员队伍是适应不断变化的社区所必需的。英语作为一门额外的语言经常被认为是获得护理学位的障碍。本研究旨在探讨英语水平对非护生及护生护理学业成功的影响。方法:采用两个开放式问题的非实验描述性定量研究。来自美墨边境27个非BSN和BSN项目的学生接受了调查。参与者(N = 158)自报平均绩点(gpa) 4.0分,并完成两种语言能力工具,语言经验和能力问卷(LEAP-Q)和英语语言文化适应量表(ELAS)。参与者回答了与策略相关的问题,这些策略对他们的学习和成功是有益的还是有障碍的。结果:GPA对英语水平预测因子的回归模型不显著。两种语言能力量表的效度趋同,信度也同样高。方差分析显示,BSN项目的学生比非BSN项目的学生拥有更高的gpa。非BSN学生的西班牙语熟练程度高于BSN学生。从问题数据中出现了七个主题,三个主题表明英语作为一门附加语言(EAL)对学生有益(支持,沟通和学术资源),四个主题是学习障碍(财务,时间管理,语言和自我认知)。结论:多样化的双语护理队伍对满足美国未来的需求至关重要。尽管语言能力不能预测学业成功,但非BSN学生和使用两种语言的BSN学生在学业上都很成功。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Language Proficiency and Academic Success of Bilingual Hispanic Nursing Students along the US-Mexico Border
Background: The Texas Department of State Health Services reported an enrollment of 29.7% Hispanic heritage students in nursing schools in 2020. Hispanics comprise of 18.5% of the total US population. Hispanic communities are less likely to speak proficient English than non-Hispanic Whites due to lack of language concordance. A diverse nursing workforce is necessary to accommodate the changing community. English as an additional language is frequently identified as a barrier to a nursing degree. This study examined how English proficiency affects nursing academic success of non-BSN and BSN nursing students. Methodology: Non-experimental descriptive quantitative research with two open-ended questions were employed. Students from 27 non-BSN and BSN programs along the U.S.-Mexico border were surveyed. Participants (N = 158) self-reported Grade Point Average (GPAs) on a 4.0 scale and completed two language proficiency instruments, the Language Experience and Proficiency Questionnaire (LEAP-Q) and the English Language Acculturation Scale (ELAS). Participants responded to questions related to strategies that were either beneficial or barriers to their learning and success. Results: Regression of GPA on predictors of English proficiency yielded non-significant models. Convergent validity between the two language proficiency instruments was supported, and reliability was similarly high. MANOVA analysis revealed students on a BSN versus non-BSN program hold higher GPAs. Non-BSN students showed higher Spanish language proficiency than those on a BSN program. Seven themes emerged from the question data, three themes showed that English as an Additional Language (EAL) benefits students (support, communication, and academic resources) and four were barriers to learning (finances, time management, language, and self-perception). Conclusion: A diverse bilingual nursing workforce is essential to meet the future needs of the US. Even though language proficiency did not predict academic success, students enrolled in non-BSN and BSN students who utilized both languages were academically successful.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信