应用失信技术评估资讯科技风险行为

Elmer Lastdrager, Lorena Montoya, P. Hartel, M. Junger
{"title":"应用失信技术评估资讯科技风险行为","authors":"Elmer Lastdrager, Lorena Montoya, P. Hartel, M. Junger","doi":"10.1109/STAST.2013.15","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Information security policies are used to mitigate threats for which a technical prevention is not feasible. Compliance with information security policies is a notoriously difficult issue. Social sciences could provide tools to empirically study compliance with policies. We use a variation of the lost-letter technique to study IT risk behaviour, using USB keys instead of letters. The observational lost-letter study by Farrington and Knight (1979) was replicated in a university setting by dropping 106 USB keys. Labels on the USB keys were used to vary characteristics of the alleged victim. Observers noted characteristics of people who picked a USB key up and whether the USB key was returned. Results show that USB keys in their original box are stolen more than used ones and that people aged 30 or younger and those who place a found USB key in their pocket are more likely to steal. This suggests that the decision to steal a USB key is taken at the moment of pick up, despite ample opportunity to return it. The lost USB key technique proved to be a feasible method of data collection to measure policy compliance and thus also risk behaviour.","PeriodicalId":252423,"journal":{"name":"2013 Third Workshop on Socio-Technical Aspects in Security and Trust","volume":"1 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2013-06-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Applying the Lost-Letter Technique to Assess IT Risk Behaviour\",\"authors\":\"Elmer Lastdrager, Lorena Montoya, P. Hartel, M. Junger\",\"doi\":\"10.1109/STAST.2013.15\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Information security policies are used to mitigate threats for which a technical prevention is not feasible. Compliance with information security policies is a notoriously difficult issue. Social sciences could provide tools to empirically study compliance with policies. We use a variation of the lost-letter technique to study IT risk behaviour, using USB keys instead of letters. The observational lost-letter study by Farrington and Knight (1979) was replicated in a university setting by dropping 106 USB keys. Labels on the USB keys were used to vary characteristics of the alleged victim. Observers noted characteristics of people who picked a USB key up and whether the USB key was returned. Results show that USB keys in their original box are stolen more than used ones and that people aged 30 or younger and those who place a found USB key in their pocket are more likely to steal. This suggests that the decision to steal a USB key is taken at the moment of pick up, despite ample opportunity to return it. The lost USB key technique proved to be a feasible method of data collection to measure policy compliance and thus also risk behaviour.\",\"PeriodicalId\":252423,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"2013 Third Workshop on Socio-Technical Aspects in Security and Trust\",\"volume\":\"1 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2013-06-29\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"2\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"2013 Third Workshop on Socio-Technical Aspects in Security and Trust\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1109/STAST.2013.15\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2013 Third Workshop on Socio-Technical Aspects in Security and Trust","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/STAST.2013.15","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

摘要

信息安全策略用于减轻技术预防不可行的威胁。遵从信息安全策略是一个非常困难的问题。社会科学可以为实证研究政策遵守情况提供工具。我们使用丢失信件技术的一种变体来研究IT风险行为,使用USB密钥而不是信件。Farrington和Knight(1979)对丢失信件的观察性研究在大学环境中进行了复制,通过丢失106个USB密钥。USB密钥上的标签被用来改变所谓受害者的特征。观察人员记录了捡到USB密钥的人的特征,以及USB密钥是否被归还。结果显示,放在原装盒里的USB钥匙比用过的更容易被盗,年龄在30岁及以下的人和把找到的USB钥匙放在口袋里的人更容易被盗。这表明偷u盘的决定是在捡到的那一刻做出的,尽管有很多机会归还它。事实证明,丢失USB密钥技术是一种可行的数据收集方法,可以衡量政策遵守情况,从而也可以衡量风险行为。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Applying the Lost-Letter Technique to Assess IT Risk Behaviour
Information security policies are used to mitigate threats for which a technical prevention is not feasible. Compliance with information security policies is a notoriously difficult issue. Social sciences could provide tools to empirically study compliance with policies. We use a variation of the lost-letter technique to study IT risk behaviour, using USB keys instead of letters. The observational lost-letter study by Farrington and Knight (1979) was replicated in a university setting by dropping 106 USB keys. Labels on the USB keys were used to vary characteristics of the alleged victim. Observers noted characteristics of people who picked a USB key up and whether the USB key was returned. Results show that USB keys in their original box are stolen more than used ones and that people aged 30 or younger and those who place a found USB key in their pocket are more likely to steal. This suggests that the decision to steal a USB key is taken at the moment of pick up, despite ample opportunity to return it. The lost USB key technique proved to be a feasible method of data collection to measure policy compliance and thus also risk behaviour.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信