为萨玛林达市政府提供了一个卓有成效的项目

Muhammad Helmi
{"title":"为萨玛林达市政府提供了一个卓有成效的项目","authors":"Muhammad Helmi","doi":"10.54902/jri.v4i1.59","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Pro-Bebaya is the flagship program of the Mayor of Samarinda in 2022. However, as a pilot project, in 2021, one Neighborhood Association is appointed for each sub-district. Because the program is new, it is necessary to assess the effectiveness of its implementation with a progressive legal approach, namely the operation of law in society. After analyzing several problems. First, the regulations have been revised while the program has not been implemented. Second, the Pro-Bebaya changes/revisions did not have a significant impact. Initially, Pokmas were formed through Urban village meetings, then formed through community meetings. Deliberation in the field is more effective in the Urban village than in the community. Third, in the Pro-Bebaya provisions some assistants assist from the beginning of planning to report, however, during the 2021 Pilot Project, Gunung Panjang Village there was no assistance, and also during the planning and preparation of the RAB proposed by each Neighborhood Association for 2022 they were not accompanied by assistants. Fourth, in 2022 all of the neighborhoods made RAB not check the standard book. Fifth, based on the experience of the Gunung Panjang Pokmas in 2020 and 2021, they experienced difficulties in making reports and taxes. Because reporting does not have standards such as receipts, goods orders (SPB), and Work Received Minutes (BAPPHP), and the tax value is confusing. Sixth, the lack of clarity on the Pro-Bebaya regulations, who will occupy the self-management team among the planning team, implementing team, and supervisory team","PeriodicalId":363600,"journal":{"name":"Jurnal Riset Inossa","volume":"1 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-09-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"PRO-BEBAYA EFFECTIVENESS AS A LEADING PROGRAM FOR THE GOVERNMENT OF SAMARINDA CITY\",\"authors\":\"Muhammad Helmi\",\"doi\":\"10.54902/jri.v4i1.59\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Pro-Bebaya is the flagship program of the Mayor of Samarinda in 2022. However, as a pilot project, in 2021, one Neighborhood Association is appointed for each sub-district. Because the program is new, it is necessary to assess the effectiveness of its implementation with a progressive legal approach, namely the operation of law in society. After analyzing several problems. First, the regulations have been revised while the program has not been implemented. Second, the Pro-Bebaya changes/revisions did not have a significant impact. Initially, Pokmas were formed through Urban village meetings, then formed through community meetings. Deliberation in the field is more effective in the Urban village than in the community. Third, in the Pro-Bebaya provisions some assistants assist from the beginning of planning to report, however, during the 2021 Pilot Project, Gunung Panjang Village there was no assistance, and also during the planning and preparation of the RAB proposed by each Neighborhood Association for 2022 they were not accompanied by assistants. Fourth, in 2022 all of the neighborhoods made RAB not check the standard book. Fifth, based on the experience of the Gunung Panjang Pokmas in 2020 and 2021, they experienced difficulties in making reports and taxes. Because reporting does not have standards such as receipts, goods orders (SPB), and Work Received Minutes (BAPPHP), and the tax value is confusing. Sixth, the lack of clarity on the Pro-Bebaya regulations, who will occupy the self-management team among the planning team, implementing team, and supervisory team\",\"PeriodicalId\":363600,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Jurnal Riset Inossa\",\"volume\":\"1 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-09-13\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Jurnal Riset Inossa\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.54902/jri.v4i1.59\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Jurnal Riset Inossa","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.54902/jri.v4i1.59","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

Pro-Bebaya是2022年萨玛林达市长的旗舰计划。然而,作为一个试点项目,到2021年,每个街道将任命一个社区协会。由于该计划是新的,因此有必要用渐进的法律方法来评估其实施的有效性,即法律在社会中的运作。在分析了几个问题之后。首先,条例已经修订,而该计划尚未实施。第二,Pro-Bebaya的改变/修订没有显著的影响。最初,Pokmas是通过城中村会议形成的,然后通过社区会议形成。在城中村,实地审议比在社区中更有效。第三,在Pro-Bebaya规定中,一些助手从规划开始就协助报告,然而,在2021年试点项目期间,Gunung Panjang村没有任何协助,而且在规划和准备每个社区协会提出的2022年RAB期间,他们也没有助手陪同。第四,在2022年,所有的社区都要求RAB不检查标准书。第五,根据2020年和2021年的军部班长会议的经验,他们在报告和纳税方面遇到了困难。因为报告没有诸如收据、货物订单(SPB)和工作记录(BAPPHP)等标准,而且税值令人困惑。六是Pro-Bebaya法规不明确,在计划团队、执行团队和监督团队中,谁将占据自我管理团队
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
PRO-BEBAYA EFFECTIVENESS AS A LEADING PROGRAM FOR THE GOVERNMENT OF SAMARINDA CITY
Pro-Bebaya is the flagship program of the Mayor of Samarinda in 2022. However, as a pilot project, in 2021, one Neighborhood Association is appointed for each sub-district. Because the program is new, it is necessary to assess the effectiveness of its implementation with a progressive legal approach, namely the operation of law in society. After analyzing several problems. First, the regulations have been revised while the program has not been implemented. Second, the Pro-Bebaya changes/revisions did not have a significant impact. Initially, Pokmas were formed through Urban village meetings, then formed through community meetings. Deliberation in the field is more effective in the Urban village than in the community. Third, in the Pro-Bebaya provisions some assistants assist from the beginning of planning to report, however, during the 2021 Pilot Project, Gunung Panjang Village there was no assistance, and also during the planning and preparation of the RAB proposed by each Neighborhood Association for 2022 they were not accompanied by assistants. Fourth, in 2022 all of the neighborhoods made RAB not check the standard book. Fifth, based on the experience of the Gunung Panjang Pokmas in 2020 and 2021, they experienced difficulties in making reports and taxes. Because reporting does not have standards such as receipts, goods orders (SPB), and Work Received Minutes (BAPPHP), and the tax value is confusing. Sixth, the lack of clarity on the Pro-Bebaya regulations, who will occupy the self-management team among the planning team, implementing team, and supervisory team
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信