前列腺肽对洛美沙星跨膜内流的影响。

A. Dukhanin
{"title":"前列腺肽对洛美沙星跨膜内流的影响。","authors":"A. Dukhanin","doi":"10.29188/2222-8543-2022-15-3-28-34","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Introduction. The use of peptides that penetrate the cell without the participation of membrane proteins and are capable of intracellular transport of low molecular weight substances associated with them opens up a new stage in the development of targeted drug delivery to therapeutic targets. Aim. Evaluation of the effect of prostatic peptides of Vitaprost® (prostate extract) on the transmembrane transport of the antimicrobial drug lomefloxacin. Material and methods. In the first series, the effects of prostatic peptides on the ability of lomefloxacin to pass through artificial membranes by passive diffusion (PAMPA method – parallel artificial membrane permeability assay) were studied. In the second series, the effects of prostatic peptides on the cell permeability of lomefloxacin were studied in the Caco-2 model. Results. Comparative study of effective membrane permeability (logPe). for lomefloxacin in the absence (control group) and presence of prostatic peptides (a mixture of prostate extract at a concentration of 10 mg/ml) showed that the combined use of lomefloxacin and prostatic peptides leads to a significant increase in the logPe value, an increase of 29% on average. The specific nature of the identified interaction was confirmed: the addition of beta-mercaptoethanol (BME) to the donor compartment did not affect the permeability of pure lomefloxacin, but suppressed the cargo effect of prostatic peptides. The permeability coefficient (Papp) calculated on the Caco-2 model for lomefloxacin in combination with peptides was 13.04±1.80×10-6 cm/s, while for lomefloxacin it was 10.31±0.76×10-6 cm/s. Conclusion. Comparison of the obtained data of two series of experiments indicates the presence of a direct cargo effect of prostatic peptides on the transmembrane transport of lomefloxacin in vitro.","PeriodicalId":123040,"journal":{"name":"Experimental and Сlinical Urology","volume":"39 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-09-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Effect of prostatic peptides on the lomefloxacin transmembrane influx.\",\"authors\":\"A. Dukhanin\",\"doi\":\"10.29188/2222-8543-2022-15-3-28-34\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Introduction. The use of peptides that penetrate the cell without the participation of membrane proteins and are capable of intracellular transport of low molecular weight substances associated with them opens up a new stage in the development of targeted drug delivery to therapeutic targets. Aim. Evaluation of the effect of prostatic peptides of Vitaprost® (prostate extract) on the transmembrane transport of the antimicrobial drug lomefloxacin. Material and methods. In the first series, the effects of prostatic peptides on the ability of lomefloxacin to pass through artificial membranes by passive diffusion (PAMPA method – parallel artificial membrane permeability assay) were studied. In the second series, the effects of prostatic peptides on the cell permeability of lomefloxacin were studied in the Caco-2 model. Results. Comparative study of effective membrane permeability (logPe). for lomefloxacin in the absence (control group) and presence of prostatic peptides (a mixture of prostate extract at a concentration of 10 mg/ml) showed that the combined use of lomefloxacin and prostatic peptides leads to a significant increase in the logPe value, an increase of 29% on average. The specific nature of the identified interaction was confirmed: the addition of beta-mercaptoethanol (BME) to the donor compartment did not affect the permeability of pure lomefloxacin, but suppressed the cargo effect of prostatic peptides. The permeability coefficient (Papp) calculated on the Caco-2 model for lomefloxacin in combination with peptides was 13.04±1.80×10-6 cm/s, while for lomefloxacin it was 10.31±0.76×10-6 cm/s. Conclusion. Comparison of the obtained data of two series of experiments indicates the presence of a direct cargo effect of prostatic peptides on the transmembrane transport of lomefloxacin in vitro.\",\"PeriodicalId\":123040,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Experimental and Сlinical Urology\",\"volume\":\"39 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-09-25\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Experimental and Сlinical Urology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.29188/2222-8543-2022-15-3-28-34\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Experimental and Сlinical Urology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.29188/2222-8543-2022-15-3-28-34","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

介绍。在没有膜蛋白参与的情况下穿透细胞,并能够在细胞内运输与之相关的低分子量物质的肽的使用,为靶向药物递送治疗靶点的发展开辟了一个新的阶段。的目标。维他前列素(前列腺提取物)的前列腺肽对抗菌药物洛美沙星跨膜转运的影响。材料和方法。在第一个系列中,研究了前列腺肽对洛美沙星通过人工膜被动扩散(PAMPA法-平行人工膜渗透试验)能力的影响。在Caco-2模型中,研究了前列腺肽对洛美沙星细胞通透性的影响。结果。有效膜透性(logPe)的比较研究。洛美沙星(对照组)和前列腺肽(浓度为10 mg/ml的前列腺提取物混合物)的检测结果表明,洛美沙星和前列腺肽联合使用导致logPe值显著增加,平均增加29%。所鉴定的相互作用的特异性被证实:在供体隔室中添加-巯基乙醇(BME)不影响纯洛美沙星的渗透性,但抑制了前列腺肽的载货作用。Caco-2模型计算的洛美沙星与多肽联合的渗透系数(Papp)为13.04±1.80×10-6 cm/s,而洛美沙星的渗透系数为10.31±0.76×10-6 cm/s。结论。两组实验数据的比较表明前列腺肽对洛美沙星体外跨膜转运存在直接的转运效应。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Effect of prostatic peptides on the lomefloxacin transmembrane influx.
Introduction. The use of peptides that penetrate the cell without the participation of membrane proteins and are capable of intracellular transport of low molecular weight substances associated with them opens up a new stage in the development of targeted drug delivery to therapeutic targets. Aim. Evaluation of the effect of prostatic peptides of Vitaprost® (prostate extract) on the transmembrane transport of the antimicrobial drug lomefloxacin. Material and methods. In the first series, the effects of prostatic peptides on the ability of lomefloxacin to pass through artificial membranes by passive diffusion (PAMPA method – parallel artificial membrane permeability assay) were studied. In the second series, the effects of prostatic peptides on the cell permeability of lomefloxacin were studied in the Caco-2 model. Results. Comparative study of effective membrane permeability (logPe). for lomefloxacin in the absence (control group) and presence of prostatic peptides (a mixture of prostate extract at a concentration of 10 mg/ml) showed that the combined use of lomefloxacin and prostatic peptides leads to a significant increase in the logPe value, an increase of 29% on average. The specific nature of the identified interaction was confirmed: the addition of beta-mercaptoethanol (BME) to the donor compartment did not affect the permeability of pure lomefloxacin, but suppressed the cargo effect of prostatic peptides. The permeability coefficient (Papp) calculated on the Caco-2 model for lomefloxacin in combination with peptides was 13.04±1.80×10-6 cm/s, while for lomefloxacin it was 10.31±0.76×10-6 cm/s. Conclusion. Comparison of the obtained data of two series of experiments indicates the presence of a direct cargo effect of prostatic peptides on the transmembrane transport of lomefloxacin in vitro.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信