新法规第199A条真的会把我们都变成独立的承包商吗?

Shu-Yi Oei, Diane M. Ring
{"title":"新法规第199A条真的会把我们都变成独立的承包商吗?","authors":"Shu-Yi Oei, Diane M. Ring","doi":"10.2139/SSRN.3101180","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"There has been a lot of interest lately in new IRC Section 199A, the new qualified business income (QBI) deduction that grants passthroughs, including qualifying workers who are independent contractors (and not employees), a deduction equal to 20% of a specially calculated base amount of income. One of the important themes that has arisen is its effect on work and labor markets, and the notion that the new deduction creates an incentive for businesses to shift to independent contractor classification. A question that has been percolating in the press, blogs, and on social media is whether new Section 199A is going to create a big shift in the workplace and cause many workers to be reclassified as independent contractors. \n \nIs this really going to happen? How large an effect will tax have on labor markets and arrangements? We think that predicting and assessing the impact of this new provision is a rather nuanced and complicated question. There is an intersection of incentives, disincentives and risks in play among various actors and across different legal fields, not just tax. Here, we provide an initial roadmap for approaching this analysis. We do so drawing on academic work we have done over the past few years on worker classification in tax and other legal fields. \n \nFor an updated and expanded analysis of these issues, see Oei & Ring, \"Tax Law's Workplace Shift,\" forthcoming, Boston University Law Review (2020), https://ssrn.com/abstract=3285591.","PeriodicalId":357008,"journal":{"name":"Employment Law eJournal","volume":"20 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2018-01-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"4","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Is New Code Section 199A Really Going to Turn Us All into Independent Contractors?\",\"authors\":\"Shu-Yi Oei, Diane M. Ring\",\"doi\":\"10.2139/SSRN.3101180\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"There has been a lot of interest lately in new IRC Section 199A, the new qualified business income (QBI) deduction that grants passthroughs, including qualifying workers who are independent contractors (and not employees), a deduction equal to 20% of a specially calculated base amount of income. One of the important themes that has arisen is its effect on work and labor markets, and the notion that the new deduction creates an incentive for businesses to shift to independent contractor classification. A question that has been percolating in the press, blogs, and on social media is whether new Section 199A is going to create a big shift in the workplace and cause many workers to be reclassified as independent contractors. \\n \\nIs this really going to happen? How large an effect will tax have on labor markets and arrangements? We think that predicting and assessing the impact of this new provision is a rather nuanced and complicated question. There is an intersection of incentives, disincentives and risks in play among various actors and across different legal fields, not just tax. Here, we provide an initial roadmap for approaching this analysis. We do so drawing on academic work we have done over the past few years on worker classification in tax and other legal fields. \\n \\nFor an updated and expanded analysis of these issues, see Oei & Ring, \\\"Tax Law's Workplace Shift,\\\" forthcoming, Boston University Law Review (2020), https://ssrn.com/abstract=3285591.\",\"PeriodicalId\":357008,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Employment Law eJournal\",\"volume\":\"20 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2018-01-12\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"4\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Employment Law eJournal\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.2139/SSRN.3101180\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Employment Law eJournal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2139/SSRN.3101180","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 4

摘要

最近有很多人对新的IRC第199A条很感兴趣,新的合格企业收入(QBI)扣除额允许通过,包括独立承包商(而不是雇员)的合格工人,扣除额等于特别计算的基本收入的20%。已经出现的一个重要主题是它对工作和劳动力市场的影响,以及新的扣除激励企业转向独立承包商分类的概念。在媒体、博客和社交媒体上流传的一个问题是,新的199A条款是否会在工作场所产生重大变化,并导致许多工人被重新归类为独立承包商。这真的会发生吗?税收对劳动力市场和安排的影响有多大?我们认为,预测和评估这项新规定的影响是一个相当微妙和复杂的问题。在不同的行为者和不同的法律领域(不仅仅是税收)之间,存在着激励、抑制和风险的交集。在这里,我们提供了进行此分析的初步路线图。我们这样做是借鉴了过去几年在税收和其他法律领域的工人分类方面所做的学术工作。有关这些问题的更新和扩展分析,请参阅Oei和Ring,“税法的工作场所转移”,即将出版,波士顿大学法律评论(2020),https://ssrn.com/abstract=3285591。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Is New Code Section 199A Really Going to Turn Us All into Independent Contractors?
There has been a lot of interest lately in new IRC Section 199A, the new qualified business income (QBI) deduction that grants passthroughs, including qualifying workers who are independent contractors (and not employees), a deduction equal to 20% of a specially calculated base amount of income. One of the important themes that has arisen is its effect on work and labor markets, and the notion that the new deduction creates an incentive for businesses to shift to independent contractor classification. A question that has been percolating in the press, blogs, and on social media is whether new Section 199A is going to create a big shift in the workplace and cause many workers to be reclassified as independent contractors. Is this really going to happen? How large an effect will tax have on labor markets and arrangements? We think that predicting and assessing the impact of this new provision is a rather nuanced and complicated question. There is an intersection of incentives, disincentives and risks in play among various actors and across different legal fields, not just tax. Here, we provide an initial roadmap for approaching this analysis. We do so drawing on academic work we have done over the past few years on worker classification in tax and other legal fields. For an updated and expanded analysis of these issues, see Oei & Ring, "Tax Law's Workplace Shift," forthcoming, Boston University Law Review (2020), https://ssrn.com/abstract=3285591.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信