临终决定:心理社会视角。

W. Jackson
{"title":"临终决定:心理社会视角。","authors":"W. Jackson","doi":"10.4088/PCC.V01N0106A","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The recent defeat of a referendum to legalize physician-assisted suicide in Michigan (not to mention the performance of euthanasia on national television by a prominent pathologist) has underscored continued public interest in issues surrounding medical care delivered at the end of life. In a manner similar to its relative silence during the abortion debate in the 1980s, the medical community has been generally reticent to forward cogent arguments supporting viable models of end-of-life care. The group of essays compiled by Steinberg and Youngner are a welcome aberration to this disturbing trend.","PeriodicalId":371004,"journal":{"name":"The Primary Care Companion To The Journal of Clinical Psychiatry","volume":"22 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1999-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"8","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"End-of-Life Decisions: A Psychosocial Perspective.\",\"authors\":\"W. Jackson\",\"doi\":\"10.4088/PCC.V01N0106A\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The recent defeat of a referendum to legalize physician-assisted suicide in Michigan (not to mention the performance of euthanasia on national television by a prominent pathologist) has underscored continued public interest in issues surrounding medical care delivered at the end of life. In a manner similar to its relative silence during the abortion debate in the 1980s, the medical community has been generally reticent to forward cogent arguments supporting viable models of end-of-life care. The group of essays compiled by Steinberg and Youngner are a welcome aberration to this disturbing trend.\",\"PeriodicalId\":371004,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"The Primary Care Companion To The Journal of Clinical Psychiatry\",\"volume\":\"22 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"1999-02-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"8\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"The Primary Care Companion To The Journal of Clinical Psychiatry\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.4088/PCC.V01N0106A\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The Primary Care Companion To The Journal of Clinical Psychiatry","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4088/PCC.V01N0106A","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 8

摘要

最近,密歇根州关于医生协助自杀合法化的公投失败(更不用说一位著名病理学家在全国电视上对安乐死的表演了),突显了公众对临终医疗服务问题的持续关注。与20世纪80年代堕胎辩论期间的相对沉默类似,医学界在提出支持可行的临终关怀模式的有说服力的论点方面普遍保持沉默。斯坦伯格和扬纳汇编的这组文章是这种令人不安的趋势的一个受欢迎的反常现象。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
End-of-Life Decisions: A Psychosocial Perspective.
The recent defeat of a referendum to legalize physician-assisted suicide in Michigan (not to mention the performance of euthanasia on national television by a prominent pathologist) has underscored continued public interest in issues surrounding medical care delivered at the end of life. In a manner similar to its relative silence during the abortion debate in the 1980s, the medical community has been generally reticent to forward cogent arguments supporting viable models of end-of-life care. The group of essays compiled by Steinberg and Youngner are a welcome aberration to this disturbing trend.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信