中美贸易争端中的政治阴影

Vasil Gechev
{"title":"中美贸易争端中的政治阴影","authors":"Vasil Gechev","doi":"10.2139/SSRN.3758750","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The start of the USA – China trade dispute was given on July 6, 2018 – when the United States introduced an additional 25% ad valorem duty on $34 billion of Chinese imports. The official reasons, mentioned in a Statement by the President, were to prevent the unfair transfers of U.S. intellectual property and technology to China, and to restore the balance in the trade relationship between the two countries. Whether tariffs – a key instrument from the trade policy toolkit – can be used effectively against (alleged) intellectual property theft is debatable, and their deployment toward the reduction of the massive trade deficit with China ($375.2 billion in 2017) is only a country-specific solution. \n \nBecause of its relatively high labor costs, the U.S. does not have the comparative advantage to produce the vast majority of Chinese imports, and therefore the expected long-term effect of higher tariffs would be to reallocate parts of the trade deficit to other countries. The assumption that U.S. policymakers are unaware of this fact seems doubtful, and that brings us to the conjecture about the role of political considerations in the trade dispute. \n \nThis paper looks at both the economic and the political aspects of the dispute, as it examines the deficit’s dynamics over the last 20 years (incl. its impact on employment and household median income), plus the possible political influences: the Belt – and – Road initiative, the Chinese military build-up, and cyberespionage. The paper concludes with a short overview of the effect of U.S. tariffs on China’s GDP growth, exports, and trade balance.","PeriodicalId":131966,"journal":{"name":"LSN: Dispute Resolution (Topic)","volume":"17 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-01-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Political Shadows in the USA - China Trade Dispute\",\"authors\":\"Vasil Gechev\",\"doi\":\"10.2139/SSRN.3758750\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The start of the USA – China trade dispute was given on July 6, 2018 – when the United States introduced an additional 25% ad valorem duty on $34 billion of Chinese imports. The official reasons, mentioned in a Statement by the President, were to prevent the unfair transfers of U.S. intellectual property and technology to China, and to restore the balance in the trade relationship between the two countries. Whether tariffs – a key instrument from the trade policy toolkit – can be used effectively against (alleged) intellectual property theft is debatable, and their deployment toward the reduction of the massive trade deficit with China ($375.2 billion in 2017) is only a country-specific solution. \\n \\nBecause of its relatively high labor costs, the U.S. does not have the comparative advantage to produce the vast majority of Chinese imports, and therefore the expected long-term effect of higher tariffs would be to reallocate parts of the trade deficit to other countries. The assumption that U.S. policymakers are unaware of this fact seems doubtful, and that brings us to the conjecture about the role of political considerations in the trade dispute. \\n \\nThis paper looks at both the economic and the political aspects of the dispute, as it examines the deficit’s dynamics over the last 20 years (incl. its impact on employment and household median income), plus the possible political influences: the Belt – and – Road initiative, the Chinese military build-up, and cyberespionage. The paper concludes with a short overview of the effect of U.S. tariffs on China’s GDP growth, exports, and trade balance.\",\"PeriodicalId\":131966,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"LSN: Dispute Resolution (Topic)\",\"volume\":\"17 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-01-02\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"LSN: Dispute Resolution (Topic)\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.2139/SSRN.3758750\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"LSN: Dispute Resolution (Topic)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2139/SSRN.3758750","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

中美贸易争端始于2018年7月6日,当时美国对340亿美元的中国进口商品加征25%的从价税。总统在一份声明中提到的官方理由是,防止美国知识产权和技术不公平地转移到中国,并恢复两国贸易关系的平衡。关税——贸易政策工具箱中的关键工具——是否能有效地用来打击(所谓的)知识产权盗窃是有争议的,而将关税用于减少对中国的巨额贸易逆差(2017年为3752亿美元)只是一个针对具体国家的解决方案。由于其相对较高的劳动力成本,美国不具备生产绝大多数中国进口产品的比较优势,因此,高关税的预期长期影响将是将部分贸易逆差重新分配给其他国家。美国政策制定者不知道这一事实的假设似乎值得怀疑,这让我们对政治考虑在贸易争端中的作用进行了猜测。本文从经济和政治两方面考察了这一争端,因为它考察了过去20年赤字的动态(包括其对就业和家庭收入中位数的影响),以及可能的政治影响:“一带一路”倡议、中国军事建设和网络间谍活动。本文最后简要概述了美国关税对中国GDP增长、出口和贸易平衡的影响。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Political Shadows in the USA - China Trade Dispute
The start of the USA – China trade dispute was given on July 6, 2018 – when the United States introduced an additional 25% ad valorem duty on $34 billion of Chinese imports. The official reasons, mentioned in a Statement by the President, were to prevent the unfair transfers of U.S. intellectual property and technology to China, and to restore the balance in the trade relationship between the two countries. Whether tariffs – a key instrument from the trade policy toolkit – can be used effectively against (alleged) intellectual property theft is debatable, and their deployment toward the reduction of the massive trade deficit with China ($375.2 billion in 2017) is only a country-specific solution. Because of its relatively high labor costs, the U.S. does not have the comparative advantage to produce the vast majority of Chinese imports, and therefore the expected long-term effect of higher tariffs would be to reallocate parts of the trade deficit to other countries. The assumption that U.S. policymakers are unaware of this fact seems doubtful, and that brings us to the conjecture about the role of political considerations in the trade dispute. This paper looks at both the economic and the political aspects of the dispute, as it examines the deficit’s dynamics over the last 20 years (incl. its impact on employment and household median income), plus the possible political influences: the Belt – and – Road initiative, the Chinese military build-up, and cyberespionage. The paper concludes with a short overview of the effect of U.S. tariffs on China’s GDP growth, exports, and trade balance.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信