基于结构化演练的设计科学工件总结性评价

Nur Syufiza Ahmad Shukor, N. A. Iahad, Azizah Abdul Rahman
{"title":"基于结构化演练的设计科学工件总结性评价","authors":"Nur Syufiza Ahmad Shukor, N. A. Iahad, Azizah Abdul Rahman","doi":"10.1109/ICRIIS.2017.8002477","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Artifact evaluation is important as it helps to validate and provide direct attention to the artifact's rigor, usefulness, clarity and completeness in the field of design science. In the case of Knowledge Audit Process for Inter-agencies (KAP-I) Framework, both formative and summative evaluation were implemented to ensure all evaluation criteria are met. The summative evaluation for the artifact was carried out through a structured walkthrough, a technique in simulation that provides feedbacks from the real world. An inter-agencies collaboration case study was engaged to simulate the framework. A total of six suggestions of amendments were addressed. The positive comments gathered and highlighted from the summative evaluation exercise proved that the formative evaluation had been well served. Despite the changes made towards the refined KAP-I Framework, the main processes and flows of the KAP-I Framework remain and it also proved that the KAP-I Framework is fit for the inter-agencies setup and KAP-I Framework has achieved its rigor, usefulness, clarity and completeness.","PeriodicalId":384130,"journal":{"name":"2017 International Conference on Research and Innovation in Information Systems (ICRIIS)","volume":"1 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2017-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Summative evaluation for design science artifact using structured walkthrough\",\"authors\":\"Nur Syufiza Ahmad Shukor, N. A. Iahad, Azizah Abdul Rahman\",\"doi\":\"10.1109/ICRIIS.2017.8002477\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Artifact evaluation is important as it helps to validate and provide direct attention to the artifact's rigor, usefulness, clarity and completeness in the field of design science. In the case of Knowledge Audit Process for Inter-agencies (KAP-I) Framework, both formative and summative evaluation were implemented to ensure all evaluation criteria are met. The summative evaluation for the artifact was carried out through a structured walkthrough, a technique in simulation that provides feedbacks from the real world. An inter-agencies collaboration case study was engaged to simulate the framework. A total of six suggestions of amendments were addressed. The positive comments gathered and highlighted from the summative evaluation exercise proved that the formative evaluation had been well served. Despite the changes made towards the refined KAP-I Framework, the main processes and flows of the KAP-I Framework remain and it also proved that the KAP-I Framework is fit for the inter-agencies setup and KAP-I Framework has achieved its rigor, usefulness, clarity and completeness.\",\"PeriodicalId\":384130,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"2017 International Conference on Research and Innovation in Information Systems (ICRIIS)\",\"volume\":\"1 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2017-07-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"2017 International Conference on Research and Innovation in Information Systems (ICRIIS)\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1109/ICRIIS.2017.8002477\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2017 International Conference on Research and Innovation in Information Systems (ICRIIS)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/ICRIIS.2017.8002477","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

摘要

工件评估很重要,因为它有助于验证并提供对工件在设计科学领域的严谨性、有用性、清晰度和完整性的直接关注。在机构间知识审计过程(KAP-I)框架中,实施了形成性和总结性评估,以确保满足所有评估标准。工件的总结性评估是通过结构化的演练来执行的,演练是一种模拟技术,提供来自真实世界的反馈。为模拟该框架,进行了一项机构间合作案例研究。会议共讨论了六项修正建议。从总结性评价中收集和突出的积极意见证明形成性评价得到了很好的服务。尽管对改进后的KAP-I框架进行了更改,但KAP-I框架的主要流程和流程仍然存在,这也证明了KAP-I框架适合机构间设置,并且KAP-I框架已经实现了其严谨性,有用性,清晰度和完整性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Summative evaluation for design science artifact using structured walkthrough
Artifact evaluation is important as it helps to validate and provide direct attention to the artifact's rigor, usefulness, clarity and completeness in the field of design science. In the case of Knowledge Audit Process for Inter-agencies (KAP-I) Framework, both formative and summative evaluation were implemented to ensure all evaluation criteria are met. The summative evaluation for the artifact was carried out through a structured walkthrough, a technique in simulation that provides feedbacks from the real world. An inter-agencies collaboration case study was engaged to simulate the framework. A total of six suggestions of amendments were addressed. The positive comments gathered and highlighted from the summative evaluation exercise proved that the formative evaluation had been well served. Despite the changes made towards the refined KAP-I Framework, the main processes and flows of the KAP-I Framework remain and it also proved that the KAP-I Framework is fit for the inter-agencies setup and KAP-I Framework has achieved its rigor, usefulness, clarity and completeness.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信