信任工程团队和团队以及虚拟促进方法

Laura Pohopien, Gina Hogan, S. Bayne, James Temple, Diane Fiero, Allison Devlin, J. Patrick, Nate Sexton, Jalin Brooks, Penny Stein, Anthony Arty, R. Luechtefeld
{"title":"信任工程团队和团队以及虚拟促进方法","authors":"Laura Pohopien, Gina Hogan, S. Bayne, James Temple, Diane Fiero, Allison Devlin, J. Patrick, Nate Sexton, Jalin Brooks, Penny Stein, Anthony Arty, R. Luechtefeld","doi":"10.1109/FIE.2012.6462328","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This paper presents two related studies the first explores the typical recurring dysfunction engineering student teams face and the second evaluates the effectiveness of a virtual facilitator called the Droid Communication System (DCS) in training such teams to address the dysfunction. Using Patrick Lencioni's Theory of Five Dysfunctions of a Team this study first measured for the following: absence of trust fear of conflict lack of commitment avoidance of accountability and inattention to results. Then a virtual trust-building vignette was developed and loaded onto Droid phones to guide students to potential solutions. The studies' findings indicate that absence of trust seems to be a significant problem for engineering student teams and that 42% of participants indicate that the DCS process increased their confidence in communicating and interacting with their teams. The development of the vignettes and experimental evaluation can provide a model for future research on engineering education and on student team development.","PeriodicalId":120268,"journal":{"name":"2012 Frontiers in Education Conference Proceedings","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2012-10-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Trust in engineering teams and groups and virtual facilitation methods\",\"authors\":\"Laura Pohopien, Gina Hogan, S. Bayne, James Temple, Diane Fiero, Allison Devlin, J. Patrick, Nate Sexton, Jalin Brooks, Penny Stein, Anthony Arty, R. Luechtefeld\",\"doi\":\"10.1109/FIE.2012.6462328\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"This paper presents two related studies the first explores the typical recurring dysfunction engineering student teams face and the second evaluates the effectiveness of a virtual facilitator called the Droid Communication System (DCS) in training such teams to address the dysfunction. Using Patrick Lencioni's Theory of Five Dysfunctions of a Team this study first measured for the following: absence of trust fear of conflict lack of commitment avoidance of accountability and inattention to results. Then a virtual trust-building vignette was developed and loaded onto Droid phones to guide students to potential solutions. The studies' findings indicate that absence of trust seems to be a significant problem for engineering student teams and that 42% of participants indicate that the DCS process increased their confidence in communicating and interacting with their teams. The development of the vignettes and experimental evaluation can provide a model for future research on engineering education and on student team development.\",\"PeriodicalId\":120268,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"2012 Frontiers in Education Conference Proceedings\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2012-10-03\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"2012 Frontiers in Education Conference Proceedings\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1109/FIE.2012.6462328\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2012 Frontiers in Education Conference Proceedings","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/FIE.2012.6462328","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

摘要

本文提出了两个相关的研究,第一个研究探讨了工程学生团队面临的典型的反复出现的功能障碍,第二个研究评估了一个名为Droid通信系统(DCS)的虚拟促进者在培训此类团队解决功能障碍方面的有效性。利用Patrick Lencioni的团队五种功能障碍理论,本研究首先测量了以下方面:缺乏信任,害怕冲突,缺乏承诺,逃避责任,不关注结果。然后开发了一个虚拟的建立信任的小插图,并加载到Droid手机上,以指导学生找到可能的解决方案。研究结果表明,缺乏信任似乎是工科学生团队的一个重要问题,42%的参与者表示DCS过程增加了他们与团队沟通和互动的信心。小视频和实验评价的开发可以为今后工程教育和学生团队发展的研究提供一种模式。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Trust in engineering teams and groups and virtual facilitation methods
This paper presents two related studies the first explores the typical recurring dysfunction engineering student teams face and the second evaluates the effectiveness of a virtual facilitator called the Droid Communication System (DCS) in training such teams to address the dysfunction. Using Patrick Lencioni's Theory of Five Dysfunctions of a Team this study first measured for the following: absence of trust fear of conflict lack of commitment avoidance of accountability and inattention to results. Then a virtual trust-building vignette was developed and loaded onto Droid phones to guide students to potential solutions. The studies' findings indicate that absence of trust seems to be a significant problem for engineering student teams and that 42% of participants indicate that the DCS process increased their confidence in communicating and interacting with their teams. The development of the vignettes and experimental evaluation can provide a model for future research on engineering education and on student team development.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信