共同创造包容性公共空间:从四个全球包容性城市案例研究中学习

Mikaela Patrick, Iain McKinnon
{"title":"共同创造包容性公共空间:从四个全球包容性城市案例研究中学习","authors":"Mikaela Patrick, Iain McKinnon","doi":"10.32891/jps.v7i2.1500","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This paper presents some of the findings from a global research study on inclusive infrastructure and city design and will focus on inclusive public spaces. Persons with disabilities can experience multi-dimensional exclusion from urban life, including but not limited to physical, attitudinal and social barriers. Public spaces, including recreational and social spaces, are often not prioritised.  Inclusive public spaces are fundamental to participation and inclusive in society. Including persons with disabilities in the design and planning of the built environment supports equal rights and helps identify people’s aspirations for inclusive environments. Four city case studies will be discussed in this paper: Ulaanbaatar, Mongolia; Varanasi, India; Surakarta, Indonesia; and Nairobi, Kenya. Research participants and objectives are organised by three stakeholder groups: \n \nPeople - first-hand experiences of persons with disabilities living in the city and their aspirations for a more inclusive city \nPolicy - the awareness and understanding of inclusive design among policy-makers \nPractice - the awareness and understanding of inclusive design among practitioners including barriers to implementation, opportunities and the relationship with assistive technology \n \nMethods include document reviews, interviews, photo diaries and co-design workshops with participatory and inclusive engagement of persons with disabilities throughout.  Findings on public spaces are discussed in three ways: \n \nThe types of public spaces valued by participants in each of the four cities. \nThe barriers and challenges experienced by persons with disabilities in the public realm. \nAspirations for more inclusive public spaces and opportunities for inclusive design \n \nThe paper concludes by discussing how the targeted stakeholder groups of people, policy and practice also help represent three essential dimensions of inclusive city design and forming a framework for successful implementation and delivery and supporting targets set out through the UNCRPD and Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs). \n  \nRead the full article in accessible html-format here.","PeriodicalId":407771,"journal":{"name":"The Journal of Public Space","volume":"1 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-06-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Co-creating Inclusive Public Spaces: Learnings from Four Global Case Studies on inclusive Cities\",\"authors\":\"Mikaela Patrick, Iain McKinnon\",\"doi\":\"10.32891/jps.v7i2.1500\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"This paper presents some of the findings from a global research study on inclusive infrastructure and city design and will focus on inclusive public spaces. Persons with disabilities can experience multi-dimensional exclusion from urban life, including but not limited to physical, attitudinal and social barriers. Public spaces, including recreational and social spaces, are often not prioritised.  Inclusive public spaces are fundamental to participation and inclusive in society. Including persons with disabilities in the design and planning of the built environment supports equal rights and helps identify people’s aspirations for inclusive environments. Four city case studies will be discussed in this paper: Ulaanbaatar, Mongolia; Varanasi, India; Surakarta, Indonesia; and Nairobi, Kenya. Research participants and objectives are organised by three stakeholder groups: \\n \\nPeople - first-hand experiences of persons with disabilities living in the city and their aspirations for a more inclusive city \\nPolicy - the awareness and understanding of inclusive design among policy-makers \\nPractice - the awareness and understanding of inclusive design among practitioners including barriers to implementation, opportunities and the relationship with assistive technology \\n \\nMethods include document reviews, interviews, photo diaries and co-design workshops with participatory and inclusive engagement of persons with disabilities throughout.  Findings on public spaces are discussed in three ways: \\n \\nThe types of public spaces valued by participants in each of the four cities. \\nThe barriers and challenges experienced by persons with disabilities in the public realm. \\nAspirations for more inclusive public spaces and opportunities for inclusive design \\n \\nThe paper concludes by discussing how the targeted stakeholder groups of people, policy and practice also help represent three essential dimensions of inclusive city design and forming a framework for successful implementation and delivery and supporting targets set out through the UNCRPD and Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs). \\n  \\nRead the full article in accessible html-format here.\",\"PeriodicalId\":407771,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"The Journal of Public Space\",\"volume\":\"1 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-06-26\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"2\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"The Journal of Public Space\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.32891/jps.v7i2.1500\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The Journal of Public Space","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.32891/jps.v7i2.1500","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

摘要

本文介绍了一项关于包容性基础设施和城市设计的全球研究的一些发现,并将重点关注包容性公共空间。残疾人可能在多方面被排斥在城市生活之外,包括但不限于身体上、态度上和社会上的障碍。公共空间,包括娱乐和社交空间,往往没有得到优先考虑。包容的公共空间是参与和包容社会的基础。将残疾人纳入建筑环境的设计和规划中,有助于支持平等权利,并有助于确定人们对包容性环境的愿望。本文将讨论四个城市的案例研究:蒙古的乌兰巴托;瓦拉纳西,印度;苏拉卡尔塔、印尼;以及肯尼亚的内罗毕。研究参与者和目标由三个利益相关者团体组织:政策制定者对包容性设计的认识和理解实践——从业者对包容性设计的认识和理解,包括实施的障碍、机会和与辅助技术的关系方法包括文件审查、访谈、照片日记和共同设计讲习班,残疾人全程参与和包容参与。关于公共空间的调查结果从三个方面进行了讨论:四个城市的参与者所重视的公共空间类型。残疾人在公共领域遇到的障碍和挑战。本文最后讨论了目标利益相关者群体(人群、政策和实践)如何帮助代表包容性城市设计的三个基本维度,并形成一个框架,以成功实施和交付,并支持通过《联合国残疾人权利公约》和可持续发展目标(SDGs)制定的目标。在这里以可访问的html格式阅读全文。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Co-creating Inclusive Public Spaces: Learnings from Four Global Case Studies on inclusive Cities
This paper presents some of the findings from a global research study on inclusive infrastructure and city design and will focus on inclusive public spaces. Persons with disabilities can experience multi-dimensional exclusion from urban life, including but not limited to physical, attitudinal and social barriers. Public spaces, including recreational and social spaces, are often not prioritised.  Inclusive public spaces are fundamental to participation and inclusive in society. Including persons with disabilities in the design and planning of the built environment supports equal rights and helps identify people’s aspirations for inclusive environments. Four city case studies will be discussed in this paper: Ulaanbaatar, Mongolia; Varanasi, India; Surakarta, Indonesia; and Nairobi, Kenya. Research participants and objectives are organised by three stakeholder groups: People - first-hand experiences of persons with disabilities living in the city and their aspirations for a more inclusive city Policy - the awareness and understanding of inclusive design among policy-makers Practice - the awareness and understanding of inclusive design among practitioners including barriers to implementation, opportunities and the relationship with assistive technology Methods include document reviews, interviews, photo diaries and co-design workshops with participatory and inclusive engagement of persons with disabilities throughout.  Findings on public spaces are discussed in three ways: The types of public spaces valued by participants in each of the four cities. The barriers and challenges experienced by persons with disabilities in the public realm. Aspirations for more inclusive public spaces and opportunities for inclusive design The paper concludes by discussing how the targeted stakeholder groups of people, policy and practice also help represent three essential dimensions of inclusive city design and forming a framework for successful implementation and delivery and supporting targets set out through the UNCRPD and Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs).   Read the full article in accessible html-format here.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信