P. Miller, M. Commons, Eva Yujia Li, Hudson F Golino, Lucas Alexander Haley Commons-Miller, Charu T. Tuladhar
{"title":"定价策略阶段预测收益:非正式经济学研究。","authors":"P. Miller, M. Commons, Eva Yujia Li, Hudson F Golino, Lucas Alexander Haley Commons-Miller, Charu T. Tuladhar","doi":"10.1037/H0101031","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"An individual’s income results from the way or ways in which they work and how they are paid. In recent years, income disparities have been rising in a number of countries (e.g., Piketty & Saez, 2003). A common notion is that income disparity can be reduced by creating equal opportunity for education for all individuals. To put this idea to the test, we examined the relative contributions of education, of country of origin, and of stage of development to people’s income. Specifically, the stage of pricing strategies used and the level of education were used to predict income. Participants were individuals who worked in the informal economies within 2 countries: Brazil and the United States. Two groups of people were studied: people who sell things on the sidewalks or at flea markets (peddlers) and people who transport goods (carters). All participants were asked how they set their prices, and how much money they earned either per day, per week or per month. A regression analysis showed that behavioral stage of an individual’s pricing strategy and their country of origin were the best predictors of income obtained, R(44) 0.705, (R .497; F(1, 44) 20.78, p .0005). Stage and country both contributed significantly to the income obtained; for stage, 0.408, and for country, .501. A second regression analysis that included education found that education did not significantly predict earnings, over and above stage and country of origin. These results indicate that education by itself may not be enough to increase earnings and decrease income disparities. Unless there are interventions to raise individuals’ developmental stage social stratification will likely continue to exist and even to increase.","PeriodicalId":314223,"journal":{"name":"The Behavioral Development Bulletin","volume":"20 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2015-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"8","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Stage of pricing strategy predicts earnings: A study of informal economics.\",\"authors\":\"P. Miller, M. Commons, Eva Yujia Li, Hudson F Golino, Lucas Alexander Haley Commons-Miller, Charu T. Tuladhar\",\"doi\":\"10.1037/H0101031\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"An individual’s income results from the way or ways in which they work and how they are paid. In recent years, income disparities have been rising in a number of countries (e.g., Piketty & Saez, 2003). A common notion is that income disparity can be reduced by creating equal opportunity for education for all individuals. To put this idea to the test, we examined the relative contributions of education, of country of origin, and of stage of development to people’s income. Specifically, the stage of pricing strategies used and the level of education were used to predict income. Participants were individuals who worked in the informal economies within 2 countries: Brazil and the United States. Two groups of people were studied: people who sell things on the sidewalks or at flea markets (peddlers) and people who transport goods (carters). All participants were asked how they set their prices, and how much money they earned either per day, per week or per month. A regression analysis showed that behavioral stage of an individual’s pricing strategy and their country of origin were the best predictors of income obtained, R(44) 0.705, (R .497; F(1, 44) 20.78, p .0005). Stage and country both contributed significantly to the income obtained; for stage, 0.408, and for country, .501. A second regression analysis that included education found that education did not significantly predict earnings, over and above stage and country of origin. These results indicate that education by itself may not be enough to increase earnings and decrease income disparities. Unless there are interventions to raise individuals’ developmental stage social stratification will likely continue to exist and even to increase.\",\"PeriodicalId\":314223,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"The Behavioral Development Bulletin\",\"volume\":\"20 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2015-04-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"8\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"The Behavioral Development Bulletin\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1037/H0101031\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The Behavioral Development Bulletin","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1037/H0101031","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 8
摘要
一个人的收入是由他的工作方式和报酬方式决定的。近年来,收入差距在一些国家不断扩大(例如,Piketty & Saez, 2003)。一个普遍的观念是,收入差距可以通过为所有人创造平等的教育机会来缩小。为了验证这一观点,我们考察了教育、原籍国和发展阶段对人们收入的相对贡献。具体来说,使用的定价策略阶段和教育水平被用来预测收入。参与者是在巴西和美国这两个国家的非正规经济中工作的个人。研究对象分为两组:在人行道或跳蚤市场卖东西的人(小贩)和运输货物的人(搬运工)。所有参与者都被问及他们是如何定价的,以及他们每天、每周或每月赚多少钱。回归分析表明,个体定价策略的行为阶段和原籍国是所得收入的最佳预测因子,R(44) 0.705, (R .497;F(1,44) 20.78, p .0005)。舞台和国家对获得的收入都有很大贡献;对于阶段,0.408,对于国家,0.501。第二个包括教育的回归分析发现,教育并没有显著地预测收入,超越了阶段和原籍国。这些结果表明,教育本身可能不足以增加收入和减少收入差距。除非有干预措施来提高个人的发展阶段,否则社会分层很可能会继续存在甚至增加。
Stage of pricing strategy predicts earnings: A study of informal economics.
An individual’s income results from the way or ways in which they work and how they are paid. In recent years, income disparities have been rising in a number of countries (e.g., Piketty & Saez, 2003). A common notion is that income disparity can be reduced by creating equal opportunity for education for all individuals. To put this idea to the test, we examined the relative contributions of education, of country of origin, and of stage of development to people’s income. Specifically, the stage of pricing strategies used and the level of education were used to predict income. Participants were individuals who worked in the informal economies within 2 countries: Brazil and the United States. Two groups of people were studied: people who sell things on the sidewalks or at flea markets (peddlers) and people who transport goods (carters). All participants were asked how they set their prices, and how much money they earned either per day, per week or per month. A regression analysis showed that behavioral stage of an individual’s pricing strategy and their country of origin were the best predictors of income obtained, R(44) 0.705, (R .497; F(1, 44) 20.78, p .0005). Stage and country both contributed significantly to the income obtained; for stage, 0.408, and for country, .501. A second regression analysis that included education found that education did not significantly predict earnings, over and above stage and country of origin. These results indicate that education by itself may not be enough to increase earnings and decrease income disparities. Unless there are interventions to raise individuals’ developmental stage social stratification will likely continue to exist and even to increase.