需要加强:如何提高加拿大儿童疫苗接种覆盖率

C. Busby, A. Jacobs, R. Muthukumaran
{"title":"需要加强:如何提高加拿大儿童疫苗接种覆盖率","authors":"C. Busby, A. Jacobs, R. Muthukumaran","doi":"10.2139/SSRN.2962390","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Recent outbreaks of infectious disease are a troubling reminder of insufficient vaccination coverage in many communities across Canada. These outbreaks should renew efforts in policies and programs that can expand vaccination coverage, especially among young children. There is also a good economic case. Evidence shows that public funds spent on childhood measles, mumps and rubella immunization results in major cost savings from reduced visits to healthcare providers, fewer hospitalizations and premature deaths, as well as reduced time off by parents to care for sick children. Parents who do not have their children vaccinated cannot be classified neatly as “anti-vaccine.” Some feel they lack information or have safety concerns, others might find themselves too busy and many are unaware of the risks of infectious disease. The reasons behind incomplete immunization are complex, context- and often community-specific. In this Commentary, we explore the many reasons immunization coverage is falling below national targets and we analyze the differences in how provinces organize their immunization programs, encouraging provinces to share lessons learned and embrace common challenges. A vocal few Canadians – perhaps 2 percent of the population – hold anti-vaccine views, but they are not the main reason for insufficient vaccination coverage, and arguably too much attention and energy are spent trying to engage them. A more sensible strategy would instead target the large group of “vaccine hesitant” parents, whose children get some but not all vaccines, or fall behind schedule. The diverse reasons that these children are unimmunized or underimmunized rule out a simple solution; instead, we advocate varied, multifaceted interventions. Most provinces need to supplement the unique aspects of their childhood vaccination frameworks with features that help to bolster uptake, including rigorous, early interventions that target vaccine-hesitant parents; greater involvement of public health nurses; use of electronic registries to enable reminders and targeted interventions; and a system of school-based, and increasingly daycare-based, checkpoints and prompts that encourage those who fall behind schedule to catch up.","PeriodicalId":353219,"journal":{"name":"C.D. Howe Institute Commentary","volume":"2 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2017-04-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"15","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"In Need of a Booster: How to Improve Childhood Vaccination Coverage in Canada\",\"authors\":\"C. Busby, A. Jacobs, R. Muthukumaran\",\"doi\":\"10.2139/SSRN.2962390\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Recent outbreaks of infectious disease are a troubling reminder of insufficient vaccination coverage in many communities across Canada. These outbreaks should renew efforts in policies and programs that can expand vaccination coverage, especially among young children. There is also a good economic case. Evidence shows that public funds spent on childhood measles, mumps and rubella immunization results in major cost savings from reduced visits to healthcare providers, fewer hospitalizations and premature deaths, as well as reduced time off by parents to care for sick children. Parents who do not have their children vaccinated cannot be classified neatly as “anti-vaccine.” Some feel they lack information or have safety concerns, others might find themselves too busy and many are unaware of the risks of infectious disease. The reasons behind incomplete immunization are complex, context- and often community-specific. In this Commentary, we explore the many reasons immunization coverage is falling below national targets and we analyze the differences in how provinces organize their immunization programs, encouraging provinces to share lessons learned and embrace common challenges. A vocal few Canadians – perhaps 2 percent of the population – hold anti-vaccine views, but they are not the main reason for insufficient vaccination coverage, and arguably too much attention and energy are spent trying to engage them. A more sensible strategy would instead target the large group of “vaccine hesitant” parents, whose children get some but not all vaccines, or fall behind schedule. The diverse reasons that these children are unimmunized or underimmunized rule out a simple solution; instead, we advocate varied, multifaceted interventions. Most provinces need to supplement the unique aspects of their childhood vaccination frameworks with features that help to bolster uptake, including rigorous, early interventions that target vaccine-hesitant parents; greater involvement of public health nurses; use of electronic registries to enable reminders and targeted interventions; and a system of school-based, and increasingly daycare-based, checkpoints and prompts that encourage those who fall behind schedule to catch up.\",\"PeriodicalId\":353219,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"C.D. Howe Institute Commentary\",\"volume\":\"2 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2017-04-27\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"15\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"C.D. Howe Institute Commentary\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.2139/SSRN.2962390\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"C.D. Howe Institute Commentary","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2139/SSRN.2962390","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 15

摘要

最近爆发的传染病令人不安地提醒人们,加拿大许多社区的疫苗接种覆盖率不足。这些疫情应重新努力制定政策和规划,以扩大疫苗接种覆盖面,特别是在幼儿中。还有一个很好的经济案例。有证据表明,用于儿童麻疹、腮腺炎和风疹免疫接种的公共资金减少了对卫生保健提供者的访问,减少了住院和过早死亡,减少了父母照顾患病儿童的时间,从而节省了大量费用。不让孩子接种疫苗的父母不能被整齐地归类为“反疫苗”。一些人觉得他们缺乏信息或有安全方面的担忧,另一些人可能发现自己太忙了,许多人没有意识到传染病的风险。免疫不完全背后的原因很复杂,因环境而异,而且往往是社区特有的。在本评论中,我们探讨了免疫覆盖率低于国家目标的诸多原因,并分析了各省在组织免疫规划方面的差异,鼓励各省分享经验教训,迎接共同挑战。少数加拿大人——大约占人口的2%——持反对疫苗的观点,但他们并不是疫苗接种覆盖率不足的主要原因,而且可以说,太多的注意力和精力都花在了试图吸引他们上。一个更明智的策略应该是把目标对准一大群“疫苗犹豫”的父母,他们的孩子接种了一些但不是全部的疫苗,或者落后于计划。这些儿童未接种或免疫不足的各种原因排除了一个简单的解决办法;相反,我们提倡多种多样、多方面的干预措施。大多数省份需要在其儿童疫苗接种框架的独特方面补充有助于促进吸收的特点,包括针对疫苗犹豫的父母的严格的早期干预措施;加强公共保健护士的参与;使用电子登记处,以实现提醒和有针对性的干预;还有一个以学校为基础,越来越多地以日托为基础的检查点和提示系统,鼓励那些落后于时间表的人迎头赶上。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
In Need of a Booster: How to Improve Childhood Vaccination Coverage in Canada
Recent outbreaks of infectious disease are a troubling reminder of insufficient vaccination coverage in many communities across Canada. These outbreaks should renew efforts in policies and programs that can expand vaccination coverage, especially among young children. There is also a good economic case. Evidence shows that public funds spent on childhood measles, mumps and rubella immunization results in major cost savings from reduced visits to healthcare providers, fewer hospitalizations and premature deaths, as well as reduced time off by parents to care for sick children. Parents who do not have their children vaccinated cannot be classified neatly as “anti-vaccine.” Some feel they lack information or have safety concerns, others might find themselves too busy and many are unaware of the risks of infectious disease. The reasons behind incomplete immunization are complex, context- and often community-specific. In this Commentary, we explore the many reasons immunization coverage is falling below national targets and we analyze the differences in how provinces organize their immunization programs, encouraging provinces to share lessons learned and embrace common challenges. A vocal few Canadians – perhaps 2 percent of the population – hold anti-vaccine views, but they are not the main reason for insufficient vaccination coverage, and arguably too much attention and energy are spent trying to engage them. A more sensible strategy would instead target the large group of “vaccine hesitant” parents, whose children get some but not all vaccines, or fall behind schedule. The diverse reasons that these children are unimmunized or underimmunized rule out a simple solution; instead, we advocate varied, multifaceted interventions. Most provinces need to supplement the unique aspects of their childhood vaccination frameworks with features that help to bolster uptake, including rigorous, early interventions that target vaccine-hesitant parents; greater involvement of public health nurses; use of electronic registries to enable reminders and targeted interventions; and a system of school-based, and increasingly daycare-based, checkpoints and prompts that encourage those who fall behind schedule to catch up.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信