校正用于场地反应分析的一维数值编码软件

V. Hadsari, A. Susanto, W. Wilopo, G. Lanzo, A. Pagliaroli, D. Chamlagain, R. Adhikari
{"title":"校正用于场地反应分析的一维数值编码软件","authors":"V. Hadsari, A. Susanto, W. Wilopo, G. Lanzo, A. Pagliaroli, D. Chamlagain, R. Adhikari","doi":"10.22146/ajse.v1i2.2442","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Ground response analyses are used to predict surface ground motions for development of design response spectra, to evaluate dynamic stresses and strains for evaluation of earthquake hazards, and to determine the earthquake induced forces that can lead to instability of earth-retaining structures. The effects of local soil on ground motion are commonly evaluated by performing numerical analyses either in frequency or time domains.In order to evaluate the differences between frequency and time domain analysis, several analyses were conducted for homogenous stiff soil deposit with respective codes which are SHAKE and D-MOD2000. Linear and non linear analyses have been conducted. The non linear analyses with D-MOD2000 code have been carried out by using different frequencies in the Rayleigh damping formulation, i.e. fundamental and predominant frequency. For linear, PGA 0.1g is used in the analysis while for non linear PGA is scaled into three different value of 0.1, 0.3, and 0.5g.The results for both linear and non linear approach are similar. For the non linear analyses, it is shown that the curves derived using predominant frequency perform better than those using fundamental frequency. Main differences are for non linear approach where the differences between two codes are higher for higher input motion. As the calibration using predominant frequency between the two codes perform good, the respective codes are applied to evaluate soil response in Sant’ Agostino and San Carlo, in terms of PGA, due to May 20th 2012 Emilia Earthquake. There are 139 accelerometric station recorded strong motion. In this analysis, we consider one record which is in Mirandola station, the closest recording station where the Magnitude in epicentral area was 5.9 and 5.8 in Mirandola station. The recorded surface motion in Mirandola is transferred to the bedrock in 112 m depth and used as input motion for the two evaluated sites, San Carlo village and nearby municipality Sant’Agostino on 17 km distance from Mirandola station. The preliminary data presented here shows the PGA recorded in the bedrock of Mirandola station is 0.75g, while in Sant’Agostino and San Carlo is 0.92g and 0.81g.","PeriodicalId":280593,"journal":{"name":"ASEAN Journal of Systems Engineering","volume":"107 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2013-12-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"CALIBRATION OF 1-D NUMERICAL CODES SOFTWARE FOR SITE RESPONSE ANALYSES\",\"authors\":\"V. Hadsari, A. Susanto, W. Wilopo, G. Lanzo, A. Pagliaroli, D. Chamlagain, R. Adhikari\",\"doi\":\"10.22146/ajse.v1i2.2442\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Ground response analyses are used to predict surface ground motions for development of design response spectra, to evaluate dynamic stresses and strains for evaluation of earthquake hazards, and to determine the earthquake induced forces that can lead to instability of earth-retaining structures. The effects of local soil on ground motion are commonly evaluated by performing numerical analyses either in frequency or time domains.In order to evaluate the differences between frequency and time domain analysis, several analyses were conducted for homogenous stiff soil deposit with respective codes which are SHAKE and D-MOD2000. Linear and non linear analyses have been conducted. The non linear analyses with D-MOD2000 code have been carried out by using different frequencies in the Rayleigh damping formulation, i.e. fundamental and predominant frequency. For linear, PGA 0.1g is used in the analysis while for non linear PGA is scaled into three different value of 0.1, 0.3, and 0.5g.The results for both linear and non linear approach are similar. For the non linear analyses, it is shown that the curves derived using predominant frequency perform better than those using fundamental frequency. Main differences are for non linear approach where the differences between two codes are higher for higher input motion. As the calibration using predominant frequency between the two codes perform good, the respective codes are applied to evaluate soil response in Sant’ Agostino and San Carlo, in terms of PGA, due to May 20th 2012 Emilia Earthquake. There are 139 accelerometric station recorded strong motion. In this analysis, we consider one record which is in Mirandola station, the closest recording station where the Magnitude in epicentral area was 5.9 and 5.8 in Mirandola station. The recorded surface motion in Mirandola is transferred to the bedrock in 112 m depth and used as input motion for the two evaluated sites, San Carlo village and nearby municipality Sant’Agostino on 17 km distance from Mirandola station. The preliminary data presented here shows the PGA recorded in the bedrock of Mirandola station is 0.75g, while in Sant’Agostino and San Carlo is 0.92g and 0.81g.\",\"PeriodicalId\":280593,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"ASEAN Journal of Systems Engineering\",\"volume\":\"107 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2013-12-31\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"ASEAN Journal of Systems Engineering\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.22146/ajse.v1i2.2442\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"ASEAN Journal of Systems Engineering","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.22146/ajse.v1i2.2442","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

地面反应分析用于预测地面运动,以制定设计反应谱,评估动态应力和应变,以评估地震危害,并确定可能导致挡土结构不稳定的地震诱发力。局部土壤对地面运动的影响通常通过在频率域或时间域进行数值分析来评估。为了评价频域分析与时域分析的差异,分别采用SHAKE和D-MOD2000对均质刚性土沉积物进行了频域分析和时域分析。进行了线性和非线性分析。利用D-MOD2000代码,采用瑞利阻尼公式中的不同频率,即基频和主频,进行了非线性分析。对于线性,使用0.1g的PGA进行分析,而对于非线性,PGA被缩放成0.1,0.3和0.5g三个不同的值。线性方法和非线性方法的结果是相似的。对于非线性分析,用主频率推导的曲线优于用基频推导的曲线。主要的区别是在非线性方法中,对于更高的输入运动,两个代码之间的差异更大。由于两种规范之间的主频率校正效果较好,因此应用各自的规范对2012年5月20日Emilia地震中Sant ' Agostino和San Carlo的PGA土响应进行了评价。有139个加速度测量站记录了强烈的运动。在此分析中,我们考虑了米兰多拉站的一个记录,米兰多拉站最近的记录站在震中地区的震级为5.9级和5.8级。Mirandola记录的地表运动被转移到112米深度的基岩,并作为两个评估地点的输入运动,分别是距离Mirandola站17公里的San Carlo村和附近的Sant 'Agostino市。本文给出的初步数据显示,Mirandola站基岩记录的PGA为0.75g,而Sant 'Agostino和San Carlo的PGA分别为0.92g和0.81g。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
CALIBRATION OF 1-D NUMERICAL CODES SOFTWARE FOR SITE RESPONSE ANALYSES
Ground response analyses are used to predict surface ground motions for development of design response spectra, to evaluate dynamic stresses and strains for evaluation of earthquake hazards, and to determine the earthquake induced forces that can lead to instability of earth-retaining structures. The effects of local soil on ground motion are commonly evaluated by performing numerical analyses either in frequency or time domains.In order to evaluate the differences between frequency and time domain analysis, several analyses were conducted for homogenous stiff soil deposit with respective codes which are SHAKE and D-MOD2000. Linear and non linear analyses have been conducted. The non linear analyses with D-MOD2000 code have been carried out by using different frequencies in the Rayleigh damping formulation, i.e. fundamental and predominant frequency. For linear, PGA 0.1g is used in the analysis while for non linear PGA is scaled into three different value of 0.1, 0.3, and 0.5g.The results for both linear and non linear approach are similar. For the non linear analyses, it is shown that the curves derived using predominant frequency perform better than those using fundamental frequency. Main differences are for non linear approach where the differences between two codes are higher for higher input motion. As the calibration using predominant frequency between the two codes perform good, the respective codes are applied to evaluate soil response in Sant’ Agostino and San Carlo, in terms of PGA, due to May 20th 2012 Emilia Earthquake. There are 139 accelerometric station recorded strong motion. In this analysis, we consider one record which is in Mirandola station, the closest recording station where the Magnitude in epicentral area was 5.9 and 5.8 in Mirandola station. The recorded surface motion in Mirandola is transferred to the bedrock in 112 m depth and used as input motion for the two evaluated sites, San Carlo village and nearby municipality Sant’Agostino on 17 km distance from Mirandola station. The preliminary data presented here shows the PGA recorded in the bedrock of Mirandola station is 0.75g, while in Sant’Agostino and San Carlo is 0.92g and 0.81g.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信