用适应性工作支持灵活流程?收费及个案处理

C. Günther, M. Reichert, Wil M.P. van der Aalst
{"title":"用适应性工作支持灵活流程?收费及个案处理","authors":"C. Günther, M. Reichert, Wil M.P. van der Aalst","doi":"10.1109/WETICE.2008.15","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Workflow management technology has profoundly transformed the way complex tasks are being handled in modern, large-scale organizations. However, it is mostly those systems' inherent lack of flexibility that hinders their broad acceptance, and that is perceived as annoyance by users. In this context, adaptive process management and case handling provide two very different paradigms, which both attempt to make process management more flexible and user-friendly. In this paper, we compare strengths and weaknesses of these two paradigms, and point out situations in which each is particularly appropriate. We further outline ways, in which either technology can be enhanced by crucial concepts from the other. This integration of flexibility approaches has the potential to remedy fundamental problems still present in each technology on its own.","PeriodicalId":259447,"journal":{"name":"2008 IEEE 17th Workshop on Enabling Technologies: Infrastructure for Collaborative Enterprises","volume":"53 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2008-06-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"61","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Supporting Flexible Processes with Adaptive Work?ow and Case Handling\",\"authors\":\"C. Günther, M. Reichert, Wil M.P. van der Aalst\",\"doi\":\"10.1109/WETICE.2008.15\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Workflow management technology has profoundly transformed the way complex tasks are being handled in modern, large-scale organizations. However, it is mostly those systems' inherent lack of flexibility that hinders their broad acceptance, and that is perceived as annoyance by users. In this context, adaptive process management and case handling provide two very different paradigms, which both attempt to make process management more flexible and user-friendly. In this paper, we compare strengths and weaknesses of these two paradigms, and point out situations in which each is particularly appropriate. We further outline ways, in which either technology can be enhanced by crucial concepts from the other. This integration of flexibility approaches has the potential to remedy fundamental problems still present in each technology on its own.\",\"PeriodicalId\":259447,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"2008 IEEE 17th Workshop on Enabling Technologies: Infrastructure for Collaborative Enterprises\",\"volume\":\"53 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2008-06-23\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"61\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"2008 IEEE 17th Workshop on Enabling Technologies: Infrastructure for Collaborative Enterprises\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1109/WETICE.2008.15\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2008 IEEE 17th Workshop on Enabling Technologies: Infrastructure for Collaborative Enterprises","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/WETICE.2008.15","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 61

摘要

工作流管理技术已经深刻地改变了现代大型组织处理复杂任务的方式。然而,主要是这些系统固有的缺乏灵活性阻碍了它们的广泛接受,这被用户认为是烦恼。在此上下文中,自适应流程管理和案例处理提供了两种非常不同的范例,它们都试图使流程管理更加灵活和用户友好。在本文中,我们比较了这两种范式的优缺点,并指出了每种范式特别适用的情况。我们进一步概述了两种技术可以通过来自另一种技术的关键概念来增强的方法。这种灵活性方法的集成有可能纠正每种技术本身仍然存在的基本问题。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Supporting Flexible Processes with Adaptive Work?ow and Case Handling
Workflow management technology has profoundly transformed the way complex tasks are being handled in modern, large-scale organizations. However, it is mostly those systems' inherent lack of flexibility that hinders their broad acceptance, and that is perceived as annoyance by users. In this context, adaptive process management and case handling provide two very different paradigms, which both attempt to make process management more flexible and user-friendly. In this paper, we compare strengths and weaknesses of these two paradigms, and point out situations in which each is particularly appropriate. We further outline ways, in which either technology can be enhanced by crucial concepts from the other. This integration of flexibility approaches has the potential to remedy fundamental problems still present in each technology on its own.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信