Angela J. Black, Steven Devaney, P. Hendershott, B. MacGregor
{"title":"美国大都市写字楼市场动态的时空变化","authors":"Angela J. Black, Steven Devaney, P. Hendershott, B. MacGregor","doi":"10.15396/eres2019_173","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"A considerable body of research exists on how office rents, vacancy rates and new supply adjust in response to shocks to occupier demand. Research has settled upon an Error Correction Model (ECM) approach for modelling the dynamics. More recent studies have used panel data (such as Hendershott, Jennen and MacGregor, 2013; Adams and Fuss, 2012), but there has been little investigation of either the temporal or the cross sectional variation in the adjustment parameters and why these might vary. Furthermore, the econometric complications from using lagged dependent variables in such models have still to be addressed. We use panel data and dynamic panel estimation techniques for 58 US MSA office markets in this paper and we analyse differences in the parameters found for different locations and time periods, including demand and supply coefficients, implied natural vacancy rates and speeds of adjustment to shocks in fundamental variables. Cross-sectional variations are analysed using variables that depict the characteristics of different locations in terms of their economic activity, urban form and real estate markets.","PeriodicalId":152375,"journal":{"name":"26th Annual European Real Estate Society Conference","volume":"1 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1900-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Temporal and Spatial Variations in the Dynamics of US Metropolitan Office Markets\",\"authors\":\"Angela J. Black, Steven Devaney, P. Hendershott, B. MacGregor\",\"doi\":\"10.15396/eres2019_173\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"A considerable body of research exists on how office rents, vacancy rates and new supply adjust in response to shocks to occupier demand. Research has settled upon an Error Correction Model (ECM) approach for modelling the dynamics. More recent studies have used panel data (such as Hendershott, Jennen and MacGregor, 2013; Adams and Fuss, 2012), but there has been little investigation of either the temporal or the cross sectional variation in the adjustment parameters and why these might vary. Furthermore, the econometric complications from using lagged dependent variables in such models have still to be addressed. We use panel data and dynamic panel estimation techniques for 58 US MSA office markets in this paper and we analyse differences in the parameters found for different locations and time periods, including demand and supply coefficients, implied natural vacancy rates and speeds of adjustment to shocks in fundamental variables. Cross-sectional variations are analysed using variables that depict the characteristics of different locations in terms of their economic activity, urban form and real estate markets.\",\"PeriodicalId\":152375,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"26th Annual European Real Estate Society Conference\",\"volume\":\"1 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"1900-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"26th Annual European Real Estate Society Conference\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.15396/eres2019_173\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"26th Annual European Real Estate Society Conference","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.15396/eres2019_173","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
关于写字楼租金、空置率和新供应如何随着占用者需求的冲击而调整,已有相当多的研究。研究已经确定了一种误差修正模型(ECM)方法来建模动力学。最近的研究使用了面板数据(如Hendershott, jenen和MacGregor, 2013;Adams and Fuss, 2012),但对调整参数的时间或横截面变化以及这些变化的原因的研究很少。此外,在这些模型中使用滞后因变量的计量经济学复杂性仍有待解决。在本文中,我们使用了58个美国MSA办公市场的面板数据和动态面板估计技术,并分析了不同地点和时间段的参数差异,包括需求和供应系数、隐含的自然空置率和基本变量对冲击的调整速度。使用描述不同地点在经济活动、城市形态和房地产市场方面特征的变量来分析横截面变化。
Temporal and Spatial Variations in the Dynamics of US Metropolitan Office Markets
A considerable body of research exists on how office rents, vacancy rates and new supply adjust in response to shocks to occupier demand. Research has settled upon an Error Correction Model (ECM) approach for modelling the dynamics. More recent studies have used panel data (such as Hendershott, Jennen and MacGregor, 2013; Adams and Fuss, 2012), but there has been little investigation of either the temporal or the cross sectional variation in the adjustment parameters and why these might vary. Furthermore, the econometric complications from using lagged dependent variables in such models have still to be addressed. We use panel data and dynamic panel estimation techniques for 58 US MSA office markets in this paper and we analyse differences in the parameters found for different locations and time periods, including demand and supply coefficients, implied natural vacancy rates and speeds of adjustment to shocks in fundamental variables. Cross-sectional variations are analysed using variables that depict the characteristics of different locations in terms of their economic activity, urban form and real estate markets.