Ilkhom Soliev, K. Wegerich, I. Akramova, Nozilakhon Mukhamedova
{"title":"平衡跨界水治理中利益分享的讨论:以中亚为例强调长期成本","authors":"Ilkhom Soliev, K. Wegerich, I. Akramova, Nozilakhon Mukhamedova","doi":"10.7564/15-IJWG94","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Internationally the benefit sharing approach is promoted to encourage cooperation in transboundary \nwater governance. Costs of cooperation are so far under researched. Attention of few \ninternational studies is limited to benefit and cost sharing practices for dam projects. Here, the case \nstudy looks at long-term costs of cooperation in an empirical example from Central Asia. In the \nSyr Darya Basin, a compensation package for constructing the Toktogul Reservoir on the Naryn \nin upstream Kyrgyzstan required Uzbekistan to shift water withdrawals from small transboundary \ntributaries to the main river. The shift of water allocation created long-term costs for Uzbekistan. \nThe paper highlights the challenges related to the originally perceived as beneficial compensation \nmechanisms (water swaps) within one basin and long-term cost implications. The need for \nrevision of benefit sharing agreements to allow adaptation to new challenges is discussed. We \nstress the costs when existing benefit sharing arrangements are ignored whether in full or in part. \nKeywords: Transboundary water; Benefit sharing; Long-term costs; Pumping stations; Central Asia","PeriodicalId":137430,"journal":{"name":"Asian Law eJournal","volume":"66 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2018-05-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"4","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Balancing the Discussion of Benefit Sharing in Transboundary Water Governance: Stressing the Long-Term Costs in an Empirical Example from Central Asia\",\"authors\":\"Ilkhom Soliev, K. Wegerich, I. Akramova, Nozilakhon Mukhamedova\",\"doi\":\"10.7564/15-IJWG94\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Internationally the benefit sharing approach is promoted to encourage cooperation in transboundary \\nwater governance. Costs of cooperation are so far under researched. Attention of few \\ninternational studies is limited to benefit and cost sharing practices for dam projects. Here, the case \\nstudy looks at long-term costs of cooperation in an empirical example from Central Asia. In the \\nSyr Darya Basin, a compensation package for constructing the Toktogul Reservoir on the Naryn \\nin upstream Kyrgyzstan required Uzbekistan to shift water withdrawals from small transboundary \\ntributaries to the main river. The shift of water allocation created long-term costs for Uzbekistan. \\nThe paper highlights the challenges related to the originally perceived as beneficial compensation \\nmechanisms (water swaps) within one basin and long-term cost implications. The need for \\nrevision of benefit sharing agreements to allow adaptation to new challenges is discussed. We \\nstress the costs when existing benefit sharing arrangements are ignored whether in full or in part. \\nKeywords: Transboundary water; Benefit sharing; Long-term costs; Pumping stations; Central Asia\",\"PeriodicalId\":137430,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Asian Law eJournal\",\"volume\":\"66 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2018-05-17\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"4\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Asian Law eJournal\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.7564/15-IJWG94\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Asian Law eJournal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.7564/15-IJWG94","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
Balancing the Discussion of Benefit Sharing in Transboundary Water Governance: Stressing the Long-Term Costs in an Empirical Example from Central Asia
Internationally the benefit sharing approach is promoted to encourage cooperation in transboundary
water governance. Costs of cooperation are so far under researched. Attention of few
international studies is limited to benefit and cost sharing practices for dam projects. Here, the case
study looks at long-term costs of cooperation in an empirical example from Central Asia. In the
Syr Darya Basin, a compensation package for constructing the Toktogul Reservoir on the Naryn
in upstream Kyrgyzstan required Uzbekistan to shift water withdrawals from small transboundary
tributaries to the main river. The shift of water allocation created long-term costs for Uzbekistan.
The paper highlights the challenges related to the originally perceived as beneficial compensation
mechanisms (water swaps) within one basin and long-term cost implications. The need for
revision of benefit sharing agreements to allow adaptation to new challenges is discussed. We
stress the costs when existing benefit sharing arrangements are ignored whether in full or in part.
Keywords: Transboundary water; Benefit sharing; Long-term costs; Pumping stations; Central Asia