高保真模拟在临床教学中的应用:护士教育工作者的观点

Joana Mariz C. Pananganan
{"title":"高保真模拟在临床教学中的应用:护士教育工作者的观点","authors":"Joana Mariz C. Pananganan","doi":"10.31674/mjn.2023.v14i04.008","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background: Despite the benefits of high-fidelity simulation (HFS) in developing clinical skills, Nursing schools in lower-middle-income countries like the Philippines are less successful in the implementation of HFS as a pedagogy. The utilization of HFS was recommended to offset the effects of COVID-19 on clinical placements which received various reactions from nurse educators. Objective: This study aimed to explore the views of nursing educators who did not use HFS as an instructional strategy in nursing education. Methods: A qualitative descriptive research design was utilized and data were gathered through a focus group discussion involving seven nurse educators who fit the criteria. Using thematic analysis, the following themes were uncovered: (1) technological complexities and difficulties, (2) lack of training and application, (3) need for expert support, (4) inadequate resources, (5) fear and apprehensions, and (6) not a requirement but an option. Results: Multiple factors affect the use of HFS among nursing educators in a lower middle-income country that requires users to be knowledgeable, skillful, and technologically adept. The lack thereof coupled with fear has consequently reduced HFS to an option rather than an indispensable tool for nursing education. Conclusion: Hence, to facilitate the utilization of HFS, a structured HFS training program that considers the context, and faculty needs might be instrumental. Additionally, the likelihood of integrating HFS in the curriculum as an equivalent to clinical placements can be explored to future-proof nursing education from the effects of a pandemic.","PeriodicalId":261912,"journal":{"name":"Malaysian Journal of Nursing","volume":"29 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1900-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Use of High-Fidelity Simulation in Clinical Teaching: Nurse Educators’ Perspective\",\"authors\":\"Joana Mariz C. Pananganan\",\"doi\":\"10.31674/mjn.2023.v14i04.008\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Background: Despite the benefits of high-fidelity simulation (HFS) in developing clinical skills, Nursing schools in lower-middle-income countries like the Philippines are less successful in the implementation of HFS as a pedagogy. The utilization of HFS was recommended to offset the effects of COVID-19 on clinical placements which received various reactions from nurse educators. Objective: This study aimed to explore the views of nursing educators who did not use HFS as an instructional strategy in nursing education. Methods: A qualitative descriptive research design was utilized and data were gathered through a focus group discussion involving seven nurse educators who fit the criteria. Using thematic analysis, the following themes were uncovered: (1) technological complexities and difficulties, (2) lack of training and application, (3) need for expert support, (4) inadequate resources, (5) fear and apprehensions, and (6) not a requirement but an option. Results: Multiple factors affect the use of HFS among nursing educators in a lower middle-income country that requires users to be knowledgeable, skillful, and technologically adept. The lack thereof coupled with fear has consequently reduced HFS to an option rather than an indispensable tool for nursing education. Conclusion: Hence, to facilitate the utilization of HFS, a structured HFS training program that considers the context, and faculty needs might be instrumental. Additionally, the likelihood of integrating HFS in the curriculum as an equivalent to clinical placements can be explored to future-proof nursing education from the effects of a pandemic.\",\"PeriodicalId\":261912,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Malaysian Journal of Nursing\",\"volume\":\"29 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"1900-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Malaysian Journal of Nursing\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.31674/mjn.2023.v14i04.008\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Malaysian Journal of Nursing","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.31674/mjn.2023.v14i04.008","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:尽管高保真模拟(HFS)在发展临床技能方面有好处,但菲律宾等中低收入国家的护理学校在将HFS作为一种教学法的实施方面并不成功。建议使用HFS来抵消COVID-19对临床安置的影响,这收到了护士教育者的各种反应。目的:本研究旨在探讨护理教育工作者在护理教育中未采用高质量教学策略的观点。方法:采用定性描述性研究设计,并通过7名符合标准的护理教育工作者的焦点小组讨论收集数据。通过专题分析,揭示了以下主题:(1)技术复杂性和困难;(2)缺乏培训和应用;(3)需要专家支持;(4)资源不足;(5)恐惧和忧虑;(6)不是要求,而是一种选择。结果:多种因素影响着中低收入国家护理教育工作者对HFS的使用,这要求使用者具备知识、技能和技术熟练度。缺乏这种能力,再加上恐惧,因此使HFS成为护理教育的一种选择,而不是不可或缺的工具。结论:因此,为了促进HFS的使用,考虑情境和教师需求的结构化HFS培训计划可能是有用的。此外,可以探讨将HFS作为临床实习纳入课程的可能性,以使未来的护理教育免受大流行的影响。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Use of High-Fidelity Simulation in Clinical Teaching: Nurse Educators’ Perspective
Background: Despite the benefits of high-fidelity simulation (HFS) in developing clinical skills, Nursing schools in lower-middle-income countries like the Philippines are less successful in the implementation of HFS as a pedagogy. The utilization of HFS was recommended to offset the effects of COVID-19 on clinical placements which received various reactions from nurse educators. Objective: This study aimed to explore the views of nursing educators who did not use HFS as an instructional strategy in nursing education. Methods: A qualitative descriptive research design was utilized and data were gathered through a focus group discussion involving seven nurse educators who fit the criteria. Using thematic analysis, the following themes were uncovered: (1) technological complexities and difficulties, (2) lack of training and application, (3) need for expert support, (4) inadequate resources, (5) fear and apprehensions, and (6) not a requirement but an option. Results: Multiple factors affect the use of HFS among nursing educators in a lower middle-income country that requires users to be knowledgeable, skillful, and technologically adept. The lack thereof coupled with fear has consequently reduced HFS to an option rather than an indispensable tool for nursing education. Conclusion: Hence, to facilitate the utilization of HFS, a structured HFS training program that considers the context, and faculty needs might be instrumental. Additionally, the likelihood of integrating HFS in the curriculum as an equivalent to clinical placements can be explored to future-proof nursing education from the effects of a pandemic.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.60
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信