利用进程生命周期分布实现动态负载平衡

Mor Harchol-Balter, A. Downey
{"title":"利用进程生命周期分布实现动态负载平衡","authors":"Mor Harchol-Balter, A. Downey","doi":"10.1145/224056.225838","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"We measure the distribution of lifetimes for UNIX processes and propose a functional form that fits this distribution well. We use this functional form to derive a policy for preemptive migration, and then use a trace-driven simulator to compare our proposed policy with other preemptive migration policies, and with a non-preemptive load-balancing strategy. We find that, contrary to previous reports, the performance benefits of preemptive migration are significantly greater than those of non-preemptive migration, even when the memory-transfer cost is high. Using a model of migration costs representative of current systems, we find that preemptive migration reduces the mean delay (queueing and migration) by 35% -- 50%, compared to non-preemptive migration.","PeriodicalId":168455,"journal":{"name":"Proceedings of the fifteenth ACM symposium on Operating systems principles","volume":"17 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1995-12-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"397","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Exploiting process lifetime distributions for dynamic load balancing\",\"authors\":\"Mor Harchol-Balter, A. Downey\",\"doi\":\"10.1145/224056.225838\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"We measure the distribution of lifetimes for UNIX processes and propose a functional form that fits this distribution well. We use this functional form to derive a policy for preemptive migration, and then use a trace-driven simulator to compare our proposed policy with other preemptive migration policies, and with a non-preemptive load-balancing strategy. We find that, contrary to previous reports, the performance benefits of preemptive migration are significantly greater than those of non-preemptive migration, even when the memory-transfer cost is high. Using a model of migration costs representative of current systems, we find that preemptive migration reduces the mean delay (queueing and migration) by 35% -- 50%, compared to non-preemptive migration.\",\"PeriodicalId\":168455,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Proceedings of the fifteenth ACM symposium on Operating systems principles\",\"volume\":\"17 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"1995-12-03\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"397\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Proceedings of the fifteenth ACM symposium on Operating systems principles\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1145/224056.225838\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Proceedings of the fifteenth ACM symposium on Operating systems principles","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1145/224056.225838","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 397

摘要

我们度量UNIX进程的生命周期分布,并提出一种非常适合这种分布的函数形式。我们使用这种函数形式推导出一个用于抢占式迁移的策略,然后使用跟踪驱动的模拟器将我们提出的策略与其他抢占式迁移策略以及非抢占式负载平衡策略进行比较。我们发现,与之前的报告相反,即使在内存传输成本很高的情况下,抢占式迁移的性能收益也明显大于非抢占式迁移。使用代表当前系统的迁移成本模型,我们发现与非抢占式迁移相比,抢占式迁移将平均延迟(排队和迁移)减少了35% - 50%。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Exploiting process lifetime distributions for dynamic load balancing
We measure the distribution of lifetimes for UNIX processes and propose a functional form that fits this distribution well. We use this functional form to derive a policy for preemptive migration, and then use a trace-driven simulator to compare our proposed policy with other preemptive migration policies, and with a non-preemptive load-balancing strategy. We find that, contrary to previous reports, the performance benefits of preemptive migration are significantly greater than those of non-preemptive migration, even when the memory-transfer cost is high. Using a model of migration costs representative of current systems, we find that preemptive migration reduces the mean delay (queueing and migration) by 35% -- 50%, compared to non-preemptive migration.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信