{"title":"休谟论情感领导","authors":"E. Schliesser","doi":"10.4324/9781315180830-15","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This chapter introduces David Hume’s views on ‘affective leadership,’ which refers to the political management of dispositions and emotions conducive to minimal union in the social-political sense. Hume’s ideas on this are presented and analyzed by way of close scrutiny of his (and Spinoza’s) extended treatment of the fall of the Dutch statesman, Johan de Witt. This is done to articulate some distinctive features of a ‘Humean’ political theory in which the management of dispositions and emotions of a “spirit of union” play a central role.","PeriodicalId":429401,"journal":{"name":"Hume’s Moral Philosophy and Contemporary Psychology","volume":"1 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2018-06-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Hume on Affective Leadership\",\"authors\":\"E. Schliesser\",\"doi\":\"10.4324/9781315180830-15\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"This chapter introduces David Hume’s views on ‘affective leadership,’ which refers to the political management of dispositions and emotions conducive to minimal union in the social-political sense. Hume’s ideas on this are presented and analyzed by way of close scrutiny of his (and Spinoza’s) extended treatment of the fall of the Dutch statesman, Johan de Witt. This is done to articulate some distinctive features of a ‘Humean’ political theory in which the management of dispositions and emotions of a “spirit of union” play a central role.\",\"PeriodicalId\":429401,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Hume’s Moral Philosophy and Contemporary Psychology\",\"volume\":\"1 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2018-06-27\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"2\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Hume’s Moral Philosophy and Contemporary Psychology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315180830-15\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Hume’s Moral Philosophy and Contemporary Psychology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315180830-15","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2
摘要
本章介绍了大卫·休谟关于“情感领导”的观点,它指的是对有利于社会政治意义上的最小联盟的性格和情绪的政治管理。休谟在这方面的观点是通过仔细审视他(和斯宾诺莎)对荷兰政治家约翰·德·威特(Johan de Witt)堕落的延伸论述来呈现和分析的。这样做是为了阐明“休谟”政治理论的一些独特特征,其中对“联合精神”的性情和情感的管理起着核心作用。
This chapter introduces David Hume’s views on ‘affective leadership,’ which refers to the political management of dispositions and emotions conducive to minimal union in the social-political sense. Hume’s ideas on this are presented and analyzed by way of close scrutiny of his (and Spinoza’s) extended treatment of the fall of the Dutch statesman, Johan de Witt. This is done to articulate some distinctive features of a ‘Humean’ political theory in which the management of dispositions and emotions of a “spirit of union” play a central role.