沉积层的概率稳定性分析

A. Duran
{"title":"沉积层的概率稳定性分析","authors":"A. Duran","doi":"10.36487/ACG_REP/1905_26_DURAN","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This paper presents several approaches utilised by the author in assessing slope designs, inclusive of Probabilities of Failure, in sedimentary strata. A common issue seen by the author in probabilistic analyses is the use of population statistics, which honour variability in point sampling, but do not reflect variability at the larger scale. This then results in overestimates of the Probability of Failure. Issues in assessing the variability in inputs for analyses are discussed. Two case studies are presented with focus and discussion on use of the appropriate variability in the respective analyses. The cases have considered the scale at which the data is collected, and, critically, the analysis methodology which influences the approach in selection of variability. The case studies have utilised a Monte Carlo approach and use of limit equilibrium stability analysis software. Recent trends in analysis methodology (surface response methodology) and emergence of improvements in software (which allow generation of random fields) suggest the field of probabilistic analysis has matured. However, without careful consideration to the key design parameters, probabilistic analysis may simply serve to provide what appears as more sophisticated results, but which offer no additional value in managing risk for a project.","PeriodicalId":337751,"journal":{"name":"Proceedings of the First International Conference on Mining Geomechanical Risk","volume":"1 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-04-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Probabilistic stability analyses for sedimentary deposits\",\"authors\":\"A. Duran\",\"doi\":\"10.36487/ACG_REP/1905_26_DURAN\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"This paper presents several approaches utilised by the author in assessing slope designs, inclusive of Probabilities of Failure, in sedimentary strata. A common issue seen by the author in probabilistic analyses is the use of population statistics, which honour variability in point sampling, but do not reflect variability at the larger scale. This then results in overestimates of the Probability of Failure. Issues in assessing the variability in inputs for analyses are discussed. Two case studies are presented with focus and discussion on use of the appropriate variability in the respective analyses. The cases have considered the scale at which the data is collected, and, critically, the analysis methodology which influences the approach in selection of variability. The case studies have utilised a Monte Carlo approach and use of limit equilibrium stability analysis software. Recent trends in analysis methodology (surface response methodology) and emergence of improvements in software (which allow generation of random fields) suggest the field of probabilistic analysis has matured. However, without careful consideration to the key design parameters, probabilistic analysis may simply serve to provide what appears as more sophisticated results, but which offer no additional value in managing risk for a project.\",\"PeriodicalId\":337751,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Proceedings of the First International Conference on Mining Geomechanical Risk\",\"volume\":\"1 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2019-04-09\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Proceedings of the First International Conference on Mining Geomechanical Risk\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.36487/ACG_REP/1905_26_DURAN\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Proceedings of the First International Conference on Mining Geomechanical Risk","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.36487/ACG_REP/1905_26_DURAN","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

本文介绍了作者在评估斜坡设计时使用的几种方法,包括沉积地层中的破坏概率。作者在概率分析中看到的一个常见问题是人口统计的使用,它尊重点抽样的可变性,但不反映更大规模的可变性。这就导致了对失败概率的高估。讨论了评估分析输入的可变性的问题。提出了两个案例研究,重点讨论了在各自的分析中使用适当的可变性。这些案例考虑了收集数据的尺度,以及影响选择变异性方法的关键分析方法。案例研究采用了蒙特卡罗方法和极限平衡稳定性分析软件。分析方法学(表面响应方法学)的最新趋势和软件改进(允许生成随机场)的出现表明概率分析领域已经成熟。然而,如果没有仔细考虑关键的设计参数,概率分析可能只是提供了看起来更复杂的结果,但在管理项目风险方面没有提供额外的价值。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Probabilistic stability analyses for sedimentary deposits
This paper presents several approaches utilised by the author in assessing slope designs, inclusive of Probabilities of Failure, in sedimentary strata. A common issue seen by the author in probabilistic analyses is the use of population statistics, which honour variability in point sampling, but do not reflect variability at the larger scale. This then results in overestimates of the Probability of Failure. Issues in assessing the variability in inputs for analyses are discussed. Two case studies are presented with focus and discussion on use of the appropriate variability in the respective analyses. The cases have considered the scale at which the data is collected, and, critically, the analysis methodology which influences the approach in selection of variability. The case studies have utilised a Monte Carlo approach and use of limit equilibrium stability analysis software. Recent trends in analysis methodology (surface response methodology) and emergence of improvements in software (which allow generation of random fields) suggest the field of probabilistic analysis has matured. However, without careful consideration to the key design parameters, probabilistic analysis may simply serve to provide what appears as more sophisticated results, but which offer no additional value in managing risk for a project.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信