反对统治:对印尼的解放民主话语

Asmaul Husna
{"title":"反对统治:对印尼的解放民主话语","authors":"Asmaul Husna","doi":"10.35308/SOURCE.V5I1.1112","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Almost twenty one years Indonesia escape from the clutches from the regime of Orde Baru, in fact this nation does not necessarily become a democratic nation. The concept of citizenship embodied in the fourth principle of Pancasila which should interpreted as a citizen of the owner of supreme sovereignty in a country, it misinterpreted into objects which is influenced by the wisdom of the authorities, and the implementation of democracy is run solely limited to compliance with the rules and not within the framework to empower citizens. In the middle uncertainty of finding the ideal form of democracy, appear discourse on deliberative democracy which emphasizes the active participation of citizens through the media and the vocal organizations to play a very significant influence in the process of establishing the legal and political policies. If we explored it more deeply, this idea looks similar to the idea of Democracy of Pancasila which was popularized by the founding fathers of Indonesia. Offering a more humanistic approach, egalitarian, and accommodating this idea seems quite interesting if it actually implemented in Indonesia.Keyword: Citizens, Deliberative, Democracy, Participation.","PeriodicalId":148767,"journal":{"name":"SOURCE : Jurnal Ilmu Komunikasi","volume":"11 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-10-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"MELAWAN DOMINASI PENGUASA: WACANA DEMOKRASI DELIBERATIF UNTUK INDONESIA\",\"authors\":\"Asmaul Husna\",\"doi\":\"10.35308/SOURCE.V5I1.1112\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Almost twenty one years Indonesia escape from the clutches from the regime of Orde Baru, in fact this nation does not necessarily become a democratic nation. The concept of citizenship embodied in the fourth principle of Pancasila which should interpreted as a citizen of the owner of supreme sovereignty in a country, it misinterpreted into objects which is influenced by the wisdom of the authorities, and the implementation of democracy is run solely limited to compliance with the rules and not within the framework to empower citizens. In the middle uncertainty of finding the ideal form of democracy, appear discourse on deliberative democracy which emphasizes the active participation of citizens through the media and the vocal organizations to play a very significant influence in the process of establishing the legal and political policies. If we explored it more deeply, this idea looks similar to the idea of Democracy of Pancasila which was popularized by the founding fathers of Indonesia. Offering a more humanistic approach, egalitarian, and accommodating this idea seems quite interesting if it actually implemented in Indonesia.Keyword: Citizens, Deliberative, Democracy, Participation.\",\"PeriodicalId\":148767,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"SOURCE : Jurnal Ilmu Komunikasi\",\"volume\":\"11 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2019-10-22\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"2\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"SOURCE : Jurnal Ilmu Komunikasi\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.35308/SOURCE.V5I1.1112\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"SOURCE : Jurnal Ilmu Komunikasi","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.35308/SOURCE.V5I1.1112","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

摘要

近21年来,印度尼西亚摆脱了Orde Baru政权的控制,事实上,这个国家不一定成为一个民主国家。潘卡西拉第四个原则所体现的公民概念应被解释为一个国家最高主权所有者的公民,它被误解为受当局智慧影响的对象,民主的实施完全限于遵守规则,而不是在赋予公民权力的框架内进行。在寻找理想民主形式的不确定性中,出现了协商民主的话语,强调公民通过媒体和发声组织的积极参与,在制定法律和政治政策的过程中发挥非常重要的影响。如果我们更深入地探讨它,这个想法看起来类似于潘卡西拉的民主思想,这是由印度尼西亚的开国元勋推广的。提供一种更人性化、更平等的方法,如果在印度尼西亚实施,这一想法似乎很有趣。关键词:公民、协商、民主、参与
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
MELAWAN DOMINASI PENGUASA: WACANA DEMOKRASI DELIBERATIF UNTUK INDONESIA
Almost twenty one years Indonesia escape from the clutches from the regime of Orde Baru, in fact this nation does not necessarily become a democratic nation. The concept of citizenship embodied in the fourth principle of Pancasila which should interpreted as a citizen of the owner of supreme sovereignty in a country, it misinterpreted into objects which is influenced by the wisdom of the authorities, and the implementation of democracy is run solely limited to compliance with the rules and not within the framework to empower citizens. In the middle uncertainty of finding the ideal form of democracy, appear discourse on deliberative democracy which emphasizes the active participation of citizens through the media and the vocal organizations to play a very significant influence in the process of establishing the legal and political policies. If we explored it more deeply, this idea looks similar to the idea of Democracy of Pancasila which was popularized by the founding fathers of Indonesia. Offering a more humanistic approach, egalitarian, and accommodating this idea seems quite interesting if it actually implemented in Indonesia.Keyword: Citizens, Deliberative, Democracy, Participation.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信