印度初等教育制度问题与免费义务教育法——批判性评价

Muneeb Hussain Gattoo, Mujeeb Hussain Gattoo
{"title":"印度初等教育制度问题与免费义务教育法——批判性评价","authors":"Muneeb Hussain Gattoo, Mujeeb Hussain Gattoo","doi":"10.5958/J.2231-4555.3.2.018","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Probably nobody can deny the fact that country's educational system has been to a large extent a failure. One of the biggest problem is of uneven, unfair and inadequate provision of education. In order to solve these problems Right to Free and Compulsory Education Act came into effect on April 1, 2010 and hence started the contestation whether the act was really going to help the students to get their basic right of education and help in ridding the education system from longstanding barriers in the way to right to education or not? Present paper is an attempt to critically evaluate the act and tries to provide pros and cons of different provisions of the act. In doing this a brief historical context and basic framework of human rights approach to education is provided. It is argued that like many other acts the intentions of the act are noble, yet it is full of farcical, unworkable and contradictory provisions and there is a need for certain radical changes to ensure that children get their right to education in real sense. Furthermore the best option before the government to assure the right to education is to go for Common School System functioning through Neighbourhood Schools.","PeriodicalId":205837,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Exclusion Studies","volume":"3 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1900-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Problems of India's Elementary Education System and Right to Free and Compulsory Education Act–A Critical Appraisal\",\"authors\":\"Muneeb Hussain Gattoo, Mujeeb Hussain Gattoo\",\"doi\":\"10.5958/J.2231-4555.3.2.018\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Probably nobody can deny the fact that country's educational system has been to a large extent a failure. One of the biggest problem is of uneven, unfair and inadequate provision of education. In order to solve these problems Right to Free and Compulsory Education Act came into effect on April 1, 2010 and hence started the contestation whether the act was really going to help the students to get their basic right of education and help in ridding the education system from longstanding barriers in the way to right to education or not? Present paper is an attempt to critically evaluate the act and tries to provide pros and cons of different provisions of the act. In doing this a brief historical context and basic framework of human rights approach to education is provided. It is argued that like many other acts the intentions of the act are noble, yet it is full of farcical, unworkable and contradictory provisions and there is a need for certain radical changes to ensure that children get their right to education in real sense. Furthermore the best option before the government to assure the right to education is to go for Common School System functioning through Neighbourhood Schools.\",\"PeriodicalId\":205837,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Exclusion Studies\",\"volume\":\"3 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"1900-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Exclusion Studies\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.5958/J.2231-4555.3.2.018\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Exclusion Studies","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5958/J.2231-4555.3.2.018","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

也许没有人能否认这个事实:这个国家的教育制度在很大程度上是失败的。最大的问题之一是教育不平衡、不公平和不充分。为了解决这些问题,免费义务教育法于2010年4月1日生效,由此引发了争论,该法案是否真的能帮助学生获得基本的受教育权,是否能帮助教育系统摆脱长期以来阻碍受教育权的障碍?本文试图批判性地评价该法案,并试图提供该法案不同条款的利弊。在此过程中,提供了人权教育方法的简要历史背景和基本框架。有人认为,像许多其他法案一样,该法案的意图是高尚的,但它充满了滑稽的、不可行的和矛盾的条款,需要进行某些彻底的改变,以确保儿童获得真正意义上的受教育权。此外,在政府面前,确保受教育权的最佳选择是通过邻里学校实现公共学校系统的运作。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Problems of India's Elementary Education System and Right to Free and Compulsory Education Act–A Critical Appraisal
Probably nobody can deny the fact that country's educational system has been to a large extent a failure. One of the biggest problem is of uneven, unfair and inadequate provision of education. In order to solve these problems Right to Free and Compulsory Education Act came into effect on April 1, 2010 and hence started the contestation whether the act was really going to help the students to get their basic right of education and help in ridding the education system from longstanding barriers in the way to right to education or not? Present paper is an attempt to critically evaluate the act and tries to provide pros and cons of different provisions of the act. In doing this a brief historical context and basic framework of human rights approach to education is provided. It is argued that like many other acts the intentions of the act are noble, yet it is full of farcical, unworkable and contradictory provisions and there is a need for certain radical changes to ensure that children get their right to education in real sense. Furthermore the best option before the government to assure the right to education is to go for Common School System functioning through Neighbourhood Schools.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信