Joshua E Simson, E. Vázquez, J. Dunn, James H Nelson
{"title":"二级创伤中心髋部骨折收费最高","authors":"Joshua E Simson, E. Vázquez, J. Dunn, James H Nelson","doi":"10.55576/job.v2i1.5","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Objectives: To evaluate the charges for pertrochanteric hip fracture care in Texas.\nDesign: Database review.\nSetting: Texas Hospital Inpatient Public Use Data File (PUDF)\nIntervention: Charges reported by hospitals to the Texas Department of State Health Services for pertrochanteric hip fractures.\nMain outcome measurement: Charges associated with pertrochanteric hip fracture stratified by implant type and according to facility trauma level designation, urban versus rural, teaching versus non-teaching, and border versus inland status.\nResults and conclusions: There were a total of 44,853 pertrochanteric hip fracture surgeries performed over the three-year period in the state of Texas. The vast majority were treated at urban (93.4%), inland (non-border) (92.3%), non-teaching (74.2%) facilities with intramedullary fixation (56.9%). A significant increase in charges was associated with treatment at an urban ($32,412), border ($44,919), or teaching ($10,501) facility. Mean inpatient charges at Level II facilities was $113,700. Further study is warranted to determine what drives the differences in charges associated with hip fracture treatment.\nLevel of Evidence: IV; Economic Database Analysis\nKeywords: hip fracture, access to care, charge analysis, value-based care, Texas.\n (J Ortho Business 2022; 1:4-6)","PeriodicalId":152360,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Orthopaedic Business","volume":"18 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Level II trauma centers have highest charges for hip fractures\",\"authors\":\"Joshua E Simson, E. Vázquez, J. Dunn, James H Nelson\",\"doi\":\"10.55576/job.v2i1.5\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Objectives: To evaluate the charges for pertrochanteric hip fracture care in Texas.\\nDesign: Database review.\\nSetting: Texas Hospital Inpatient Public Use Data File (PUDF)\\nIntervention: Charges reported by hospitals to the Texas Department of State Health Services for pertrochanteric hip fractures.\\nMain outcome measurement: Charges associated with pertrochanteric hip fracture stratified by implant type and according to facility trauma level designation, urban versus rural, teaching versus non-teaching, and border versus inland status.\\nResults and conclusions: There were a total of 44,853 pertrochanteric hip fracture surgeries performed over the three-year period in the state of Texas. The vast majority were treated at urban (93.4%), inland (non-border) (92.3%), non-teaching (74.2%) facilities with intramedullary fixation (56.9%). A significant increase in charges was associated with treatment at an urban ($32,412), border ($44,919), or teaching ($10,501) facility. Mean inpatient charges at Level II facilities was $113,700. Further study is warranted to determine what drives the differences in charges associated with hip fracture treatment.\\nLevel of Evidence: IV; Economic Database Analysis\\nKeywords: hip fracture, access to care, charge analysis, value-based care, Texas.\\n (J Ortho Business 2022; 1:4-6)\",\"PeriodicalId\":152360,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Orthopaedic Business\",\"volume\":\"18 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Orthopaedic Business\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.55576/job.v2i1.5\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Orthopaedic Business","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.55576/job.v2i1.5","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
Level II trauma centers have highest charges for hip fractures
Objectives: To evaluate the charges for pertrochanteric hip fracture care in Texas.
Design: Database review.
Setting: Texas Hospital Inpatient Public Use Data File (PUDF)
Intervention: Charges reported by hospitals to the Texas Department of State Health Services for pertrochanteric hip fractures.
Main outcome measurement: Charges associated with pertrochanteric hip fracture stratified by implant type and according to facility trauma level designation, urban versus rural, teaching versus non-teaching, and border versus inland status.
Results and conclusions: There were a total of 44,853 pertrochanteric hip fracture surgeries performed over the three-year period in the state of Texas. The vast majority were treated at urban (93.4%), inland (non-border) (92.3%), non-teaching (74.2%) facilities with intramedullary fixation (56.9%). A significant increase in charges was associated with treatment at an urban ($32,412), border ($44,919), or teaching ($10,501) facility. Mean inpatient charges at Level II facilities was $113,700. Further study is warranted to determine what drives the differences in charges associated with hip fracture treatment.
Level of Evidence: IV; Economic Database Analysis
Keywords: hip fracture, access to care, charge analysis, value-based care, Texas.
(J Ortho Business 2022; 1:4-6)