密集随机3CNF公式的简短命题反驳

Sebastian Müller, Iddo Tzameret
{"title":"密集随机3CNF公式的简短命题反驳","authors":"Sebastian Müller, Iddo Tzameret","doi":"10.1109/LICS.2012.60","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Random 3CNF formulas constitute an important distribution for measuring the average-case behavior of propositional proof systems. Lower bounds for random 3CNF refutations in many propositional proof systems are known. Most notable are the exponential-size resolution refutation lower bounds for random 3CNF formulas with Ω(n1.5-ε) clauses (Chvatal and Szemeredi [13], Ben-Sasson and Wigderson [9]). On the other hand, the only known non-trivial upper bound on the size of random 3CNF refutations in a non-abstract propositional proof system is for resolution with Ω(n2/ log n) clauses, shown by Beame et al. [5]. In this paper we show that already standard propositional proof systems, within the hierarchy of Frege proofs, admit short refutations for random 3CNF formulas, for sufficiently large clause-to-variable ratio. Specifically, we demonstrate polynomialsize propositional refutations whose lines are TC0 formulas (i.e., TC0-Frege proofs) for random 3CNF formulas with n variables and Ω(n1.4) clauses. The idea is based on demonstrating efficient propositional correctness proofs of the random 3CNF unsatisfiability witnesses given by Feige, Kim and Ofek [19]. Since the soundness of these witnesses is verified using spectral techniques, we develop an appropriate way to reason about eigenvectors in propositional systems. To carry out the full argument we work inside weak formal systems of arithmetic and use a general translation scheme to propositional proofs.","PeriodicalId":407972,"journal":{"name":"2012 27th Annual IEEE Symposium on Logic in Computer Science","volume":"1 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2011-01-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"36","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Short Propositional Refutations for Dense Random 3CNF Formulas\",\"authors\":\"Sebastian Müller, Iddo Tzameret\",\"doi\":\"10.1109/LICS.2012.60\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Random 3CNF formulas constitute an important distribution for measuring the average-case behavior of propositional proof systems. Lower bounds for random 3CNF refutations in many propositional proof systems are known. Most notable are the exponential-size resolution refutation lower bounds for random 3CNF formulas with Ω(n1.5-ε) clauses (Chvatal and Szemeredi [13], Ben-Sasson and Wigderson [9]). On the other hand, the only known non-trivial upper bound on the size of random 3CNF refutations in a non-abstract propositional proof system is for resolution with Ω(n2/ log n) clauses, shown by Beame et al. [5]. In this paper we show that already standard propositional proof systems, within the hierarchy of Frege proofs, admit short refutations for random 3CNF formulas, for sufficiently large clause-to-variable ratio. Specifically, we demonstrate polynomialsize propositional refutations whose lines are TC0 formulas (i.e., TC0-Frege proofs) for random 3CNF formulas with n variables and Ω(n1.4) clauses. The idea is based on demonstrating efficient propositional correctness proofs of the random 3CNF unsatisfiability witnesses given by Feige, Kim and Ofek [19]. Since the soundness of these witnesses is verified using spectral techniques, we develop an appropriate way to reason about eigenvectors in propositional systems. To carry out the full argument we work inside weak formal systems of arithmetic and use a general translation scheme to propositional proofs.\",\"PeriodicalId\":407972,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"2012 27th Annual IEEE Symposium on Logic in Computer Science\",\"volume\":\"1 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2011-01-20\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"36\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"2012 27th Annual IEEE Symposium on Logic in Computer Science\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1109/LICS.2012.60\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2012 27th Annual IEEE Symposium on Logic in Computer Science","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/LICS.2012.60","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 36

摘要

随机3CNF公式是衡量命题证明系统的平均情况行为的一个重要分布。在许多命题证明系统中,随机3CNF反驳的下界是已知的。最值得注意的是具有Ω(n1.5-ε)子句的随机3CNF公式的指数大小分辨率反驳下界(Chvatal and Szemeredi [13], Ben-Sasson and Wigderson[9])。另一方面,在非抽象命题证明系统中,随机3CNF反驳大小的唯一已知非平凡上界是通过Ω(n2/ log n)子句来解决的,如Beame等人[5]所示。在本文中,我们证明了在Frege证明的层次中,已经有标准的命题证明系统,对于随机的3CNF公式,对于足够大的子句与变量比,允许简短的反驳。具体来说,我们证明了多项式大小的命题反驳,其线是TC0公式(即TC0- frege证明),用于具有n个变量和Ω(n1.4)子句的随机3CNF公式。该思想是基于Feige, Kim和Ofek[19]给出的随机3CNF不满足见证的有效命题正确性证明。由于使用谱技术验证了这些证人的可靠性,因此我们开发了一种适当的方法来推理命题系统中的特征向量。为了实现完整的论证,我们在弱形式的算术系统中工作,并使用一般的命题证明转换方案。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Short Propositional Refutations for Dense Random 3CNF Formulas
Random 3CNF formulas constitute an important distribution for measuring the average-case behavior of propositional proof systems. Lower bounds for random 3CNF refutations in many propositional proof systems are known. Most notable are the exponential-size resolution refutation lower bounds for random 3CNF formulas with Ω(n1.5-ε) clauses (Chvatal and Szemeredi [13], Ben-Sasson and Wigderson [9]). On the other hand, the only known non-trivial upper bound on the size of random 3CNF refutations in a non-abstract propositional proof system is for resolution with Ω(n2/ log n) clauses, shown by Beame et al. [5]. In this paper we show that already standard propositional proof systems, within the hierarchy of Frege proofs, admit short refutations for random 3CNF formulas, for sufficiently large clause-to-variable ratio. Specifically, we demonstrate polynomialsize propositional refutations whose lines are TC0 formulas (i.e., TC0-Frege proofs) for random 3CNF formulas with n variables and Ω(n1.4) clauses. The idea is based on demonstrating efficient propositional correctness proofs of the random 3CNF unsatisfiability witnesses given by Feige, Kim and Ofek [19]. Since the soundness of these witnesses is verified using spectral techniques, we develop an appropriate way to reason about eigenvectors in propositional systems. To carry out the full argument we work inside weak formal systems of arithmetic and use a general translation scheme to propositional proofs.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信